Jump to content

Never seen one like this, without a pallet fork that is


Recommended Posts

Evening,

This came in a job lot, and I thought I'd have a crack at a ladies watch. Mostly as it's a little bigger than a lot of others. Looked in good shape with a rolled gold back to it. As a guess 1940s ish?

20221215_175257.thumb.jpg.a88eaead7841c6d59e95baff94003c51.jpg

 

 

20221215_175343.thumb.jpg.b599d45b771677e639468038efdc8488.jpg

 

20221215_180748.thumb.jpg.69f2d095ad973f04c4707dd898e1dbd4.jpg

What really caught me by surprise was the fact it doesn't have a pallet fork. I thought fairly unusual after I realised that I'd not lost anything, it was never there to begin with. Anybody else seen one like this? Does it have a particular technical name for type of movement?

20221215_182239.thumb.jpg.2bdf93e931fe9b3f37a575a2b04210cb.jpg

 

20221215_183348.thumb.jpg.0fbfa9e854b348c55735e6693211d1bf.jpg

Which left me wondering as to who the maker is and it's real age. There are two marks, something that looks like a "TR" contained in a shield and "AS175".

Looking on the ole interweb I think it's possibly an A.Schild. Have I identified it correctly?

20221215_180814.thumb.jpg.8b397f34b117a6f53d6dd91a8975abfd.jpg

20221215_180822.thumb.jpg.71cf6944a232573c25ea90a34918a10a.jpg

Thanks in advance for any insights.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Bearman said:

What really caught me by surprise was the fact it doesn't have a pallet fork. I thought fairly unusual after I realised that I'd not lost anything, it was never there to begin with. Anybody else seen one like this? Does it have a particular technical name for type of movement?

I think Its called a " cylinder escapement"     have one that hasn't been serviced in past forty years but starts and runs as soon as you wind.

Rgds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As @Nucejoesays, that's a cylinder escapement. The only one I've ever worked on was also in a ladies' movement, which was super tiny. Really interesting mechanism!

As for the maker's mark, looks like "Ebauches Trust" to me:

image.png.b002da1449cb8eedd6d8e35ab4f358e8.png

I found these pictures with a web search for "mechanical watch manufacturer stamp."

image.thumb.png.0e8f097d30a0027c6da7104ec8eb355a.pngimage.thumb.png.08bc44158fdaa2112005f3b1bff46d94.pngimage.thumb.png.812aa89c5195fc4ea77ab0639ef72f29.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, cylinder escapement. Hard to time on a lot of modern timing equipment but member praezis has a killer software that will pick up all sorts of escapements (and is Witschi level+ otherwise).

 

Very important to have all power off before removing balance. Otherwise business as usual, lubricate escapement with 9415.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, I've since found a few youtube videos on the cylinder escapement, really interesting. You learn something new all the time. 

@ManSkirtBrewthanks for confirming my suspicions regarding "Ebauches Trust" I reckon the watch is probably 1930's now. Done some digging on the history of them and it seems they were a forerunner to what is now ETA with a link to a number of makers back then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
×
×
  • Create New...