Jump to content

Cylinder Escapement for a Pocketwatch.


Garry

Recommended Posts

I came across this forum via a google query.  I was looking for some guidance as to how rare a ruby cylinder escapement is on a Pocketwatch.  I don't know much about the watch other than it is French, with a gold case and is very delicate in appearance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Garry said:

cylinder escapement

no pictures we love pictures especially a picture of something like this. Probably a better question to ask is not how rare is it on a pocket watch but just how rare is a Ruby cylinder?

I do have to ask the question though how do you know it's a Ruby cylinder versus a standard cylinder?

Then Ruby cylinder is tended be rare because they're hard to make making the Ruby cylinder part is difficult. Then they have a habit of breaking meaning that finding a running one is going to be even more rare. So basically a Ruby cylinder is going to be rare whatever it is in.

It be nice to have a picture

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!  Pictures please!  In so far as a cylinder made of ruby, only one name leaps to mind: A. L. Breguet.  There possibly could have been others, but making the cylinder in a cylinder-escapement out of ruby was his idea.  I have worked on a few cylinder escapement watches, and would love to see pictures of this one.  John and I could possibly help identify it.

But as John says - they are rare as rare gets.  I would not envy the man assigned to search for parts for it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

There possibly could have been others, but making the cylinder in a cylinder-escapement out of ruby was his idea

casually from memory I remember there are two different designs for ruby cylinders so there were probably other makers. But no matter what making the cylinder is an interesting thing to do and they tended to be fragile. I knew somebody that once needed a replacement cylinder the problem was on their particular style of the entire end was missing that wasn't just making a new Ruby cylinder it was figuring out what the entire rest of it was. So other than getting to look at it that's as far as the project went. then in Daniel's book he actually tells how to make the cylinder. For those people have a little extra time on their hands and need an extra project.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2022 at 7:39 PM, Garry said:

I came across this forum via a google query.  I was looking for some guidance as to how rare a ruby cylinder escapement is on a Pocketwatch.  I don't know much about the watch other than it is French, with a gold case and is very delicate in appearance

This makes 4 Garry. Pictures please.  Its something i wasn't aware of . Fascinated that it was even possible and hope that the cylinder is still intact. Just as a thought i would have it measured up if its still ok. Then in case of ever any damage it may be possible to have a metal one made up to maintain a running watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...