Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have seen a few of this and they freak me out . They certainly look strang on the wrist . But they are an icon . I think they are very hard to repair . What do you think of it ? this is a listing on the Ebay http://www.ebay.com/itm/DERBY-SWISSONIC-D-I-C-OROLOGIO-DA-POLSO-VINTAGE-ELECTRONIC-WRISTWATCH-/400946557939?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_101&hash=item5d5a46f3f3

 

post-644-0-01527700-1435870162_thumb.jpg

Edited by rogart63
Posted

Very cool indeed!

My only concern is that's it's electronic; and being such, there's the problem with the circuit and coils issues ... how on earth would you ever get replacements :huh:

 

This is the sad truth of quartz, they are an item with a finite life span; and not heirloom items :(

Possibility the only exception to this would be the Accutron movement, as they appear to be point-to-point component, instead of surface mount circuit boards.  But since I have never owned a Accutron, nor seen one dismantled, I could be wrong.

Posted

This is not a quartz movement, it is a balance wheel electronic using an ESA cal 9176 which I believe is derived from the 9154 as used in many "Swissonic" or "Dynatron" labelled watches.

 

I can't speak for the 9176 as I've never had a play with one (they are really quite uncommon) but the 9154 is a really good piece of kit. It does use coils in its make up but they are reasonably robust. The movement its self can be stripped and serviced pretty much as any mechanical, except don't put the balance wheel assembly into the cleaner, it has magnets attached to it which will pick up all the magnetic swarf that has come out of previous movements (bitter experience) so just clean it separately in fresh cleaning solution.

 

post-73-0-95890600-1435932546_thumb.jpg

 

The circuitry in the 9154 is comprised of discrete components (basically a transistor, a capacitor, a diode (I think!!), and a resistor), no IC's in there at all so could be repairable. I rate these beasties quite highly as they seem to be reasonably tough, they run at a pleasingly smooth 28,800bph, and they're not too heavy on battery power. They are also quite happy with silver oxide batteries instead of the mercury cells they were originally designed to use. It's possible that there could be balance staff issues due to the increased mass of the balance due to the magnets but I have played with a few of these (and similar from Seiko) and not found any problems, maybe the shock protection is beefed up accordingly.

 

I've got an Avia Swissonic and a Seiko EL-370 lined up for servicing so watch this space and I'll post up a walk through when I'm done.

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

Very cool indeed!

My only concern is that's it's electronic; and being such, there's the problem with the circuit and coils issues ... how on earth would you ever get replacements :huh:

 

This is the sad truth of quartz, they are an item with a finite life span; and not heirloom items :(

Possibility the only exception to this would be the Accutron movement, as they appear to be point-to-point component, instead of surface mount circuit boards.  But since I have never owned a Accutron, nor seen one dismantled, I could be wrong.

Biggest issue with accutrons is coils, difficult to source them.

However I have 12 currently and all run very well indeed, very robust in my experience.

Movements will run for many decades if serviced correctly.

  • Like 1
Posted

Sweetness!! :lol:

 

This is something that actually repairable ... pretty much forever.

Coils, if kept away from moisture, and excessive current, should last a very long time indeed.  I watch an antique radio and TV restorer on youtube, and some of those coils are nearly 100 years old and still going strong.

 

rogart63, you've really peak my interest in these watches mate ... there very well could be a purchase and service walkthrough in the future :p

  • Like 1
Posted

It's hideous. I don't like any watch or clock that works with a battery. I'm strictly into mechanical. I even hated having to replace batteries.

Posted

It's hideous. I don't like any watch or clock that works with a battery. I'm strictly into mechanical. I even hated having to replace batteries.

I can respect that.

Thank you for the eye test, I passed with great ease. :lol:

Posted

I can respect that.

Thank you for the eye test, I passed with great ease. :lol:

I don't know what happened or why my post ended up so small. I like your wit with the eye test :D  I  had a hell of a job reading it as my eyes aren't so good.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny I should come across this particular thread because I have a hairspring that I’ve just knocked the collet off!! It was too loose on the balance wheel and I was trying to tighten it (of course I failed!).  So I’m looking for a new balance myself. The hairspring is in quite good shape but obviously doesn’t have a collet now, so I don’t know if you’ll be able to use it. I wouldn’t dream of trying to refit the collet myself because I know exactly what would happen!! If I wanted to refit the collet to the hairspring (assuming I can find the original as it’s on the floor somewhere!!) where would I find a taper pin small enough? As some of you may know, this whole thing is tiny!!
    • Thank you. No value to me, and I guess not much value to anyone else either - just practice fodder as far as I see them. Ingersoll might make a nice watch to wear if I manage to service it. Benrus, I suspect, is too far gone in terms of case and dial - no cheap ways of getting them to decent looking condition? I wonder how these old movements compare to modern Chinese ones? Probably not favourably, even if there's nothing broken in them? Progress moves on? I've got an old Slava that I'm quite attached to, so I won't be learning on that one.
    • Welcome to the forum. You're best starting with something that you know runs well and keeps good time. That way when you've stripped and service it, any problems are due to something you've done.
    • Welcome to the WRT-Forum! Sorry to say it, but you’re very likely to break or lose something when servicing a wristwatch for the first time — I’ve been there! So, if these watches have any value to you, don’t attempt to service them as a beginner.
    • In writing "shimming the staff" I was alluding to the idea trailed in the above referenced thread of inserting a hair along the staff which, as the discussion there covered,  could result in some eccentricity. By making a (more or less) complete cylinder I was hoping to avoid that problem. Don't tell anyone, but needing a very ductile metal to do this by manipulation at such a small scale, I used a piece of an empty Tomato pureé tube! It occurred to me that the material's ductility(?) would also put less stress on the RT in forming a sufficiently tight seal. Anyway, that's how I avoided the temptation to use glue. No doubt your punctuational response to this confession will be "!!!" !
×
×
  • Create New...