Jump to content

Rolex 3135 Regulation


Recommended Posts

Last year I serviced my Rolex. I thought it has been running great until I finally bought an electronic watch timer. I have spent the last few months regulating watches that I thought were running great. The timer said otherwise.

 

My rolex is running about 1.0ms out of beat. I understand how to adjust the rate with the microstella but I cant find any good information about how to adjust the beat.

 

Thanks for the help.

 

post-786-0-62542900-1434557480_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone more knowledgeable than me might see different but I would say its not an out of beat issue but something is amiss one side of the pallet/escapement. I think I see a vid of Mark's with this type of fault & it was a loose pallet jewel.

There are guys more experienced than me might have different views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is not the vid I was thinking of. However if you look at the reading Mark was getting with that vid it has an out of beat watch BUT the reading on the timegarpher is different to the one Scottster is getting. In my opinion there is a fault with the escapement/pallet jewel on his Rolex. If it was me I would strip & clean & re-lube the escape parts of the movement.

I did have similar fault a while ago with a ETA movement.  I had forgot to lube the pallet jewels & then lower balance jewel when re-cleaned & lubed correctly the fault went.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is not the vid I was thinking of. However if you look at the reading Mark was getting with that vid it has an out of beat watch BUT the reading on the timegarpher is different to the one Scottster is getting. In my opinion there is a fault with the escapement/pallet jewel on his Rolex. If it was me I would strip & clean & re-lube the escape parts of the movement.

I did have similar fault a while ago with a ETA movement.  I had forgot to lube the pallet jewels & then lower balance jewel when re-cleaned & lubed correctly the fault went.

Good advice. I think there is a problem also. I will disassemble it as soon as I get a chance and go from there. Thanks for your input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch is out of beat but as CB says there is also another issue.

 

It could be the hairspring coils are dirty or sticking due to magnetism as the lower line is inconstant. This means something is happening during one vibration causing this. Check hairspring, ruby pin (is it clean), pallet horns (I have seen these where unevenly), pallet stones, pivot holes for balance, pallets and escape wheel. Make sure pallet stones and roller ruby pin is not loose.

 

Most likely culprit is dirt, magnetism or incorrect lubrication.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

That is not the vid I was thinking of. However if you look at the reading Mark was getting with that vid it has an out of beat watch BUT the reading on the timegarpher is different to the one Scottster is getting. In my opinion there is a fault with the escapement/pallet jewel on his Rolex. If it was me I would strip & clean & re-lube the escape parts of the movement.

I did have similar fault a while ago with a ETA movement.  I had forgot to lube the pallet jewels & then lower balance jewel when re-cleaned & lubed correctly the fault went.

 

One of the nice characteristics of a timing machine is to see things that cannot be seen any other way. Then for diagnosing problems anything common to both pallet stones shows up with both lines. Anything that's unique to only one pallet stone shows up is only one line being affected. I've attached some images out of a timing machine manual. The most common place I've seen this is the exact same location that clockboy Is pointing out Improper lubrication on the pallet fork. In other words you just lubricated the escapement you put on the timing machine one lines a little rough you need to put a little more lubrication on problem goes away. The problem is you shouldn't see this on a watch that was serviced such a short while ago? Then if it wasn't a lubrication issue there's something wrong with one of the pallet stones. Old lubrication the was never cleaned off chipped stone something wrong with one of them.

post-673-0-54247000-1449463757_thumb.jpg

post-673-0-14083000-1449463758_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...