Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Title says it all--I have a vintage Bulova 11AC (manual wind, 17j) movement that I cleaned and re-assembled today and it times very well in DU, DD, CL, CR, CU positions (amplitude is between 250/210 in all positions with a beat error >.5 in the above positions). Lastly, it's timing pretty consistently in all the above positions (running about 60 seconds fast but I usually let it run for one full wind before making any corrections)

However it CD position, it maintains amplitude but jumps to a +5.0 beat error.

I've let it settle in for a couple of hours since re-assembly and re-oiling. I did inspect every part under my microscope before re-installing, and hand cleaned the movement (my ultrasonic is out being repaired). So on the surface I'm pretty confident that the parts are clean and no obvious imperfections.  

I've included most of the timegrapher shots, most importantly the first one, i..e,  the one that is way off crown down.

Levine98

P1020031.JPG

P1020033.JPG

P1020034.JPG

P1020035.JPG

Edited by Levine98
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Levine98 said:

Title says it all--I have a vintage Bulova 11AC (manual wind, 17j) movement that I cleaned and re-assembled today and it times very well in DU, DD, CL, CR, CU positions (amplitude is between 250/210 in all positions with a beat error >.5 in the above positions). Lastly, it's timing pretty consistently in all the above positions (running about 60 seconds fast but I usually let it run for one full wind before making any corrections)

However it CD position, it maintains amplitude but jumps to a +5.0 beat error.

I've let it settle in for a couple of hours since re-assembly and re-oiling. I did inspect every part under my microscope before re-installing, and hand cleaned the movement (my ultrasonic is out being repaired). So on the surface I'm pretty confident that the parts are clean and no obvious imperfections.  

I've included most of the timegrapher shots, most importantly the first one, i..e,  the one that is way off crown down.

Levine98

P1020031.JPG

P1020033.JPG

P1020034.JPG

P1020035.JPG

In the first photo the readings are all over the place, escapement issue ? Most noteably the amplitude is way up as well as the beat error increase. Another inspection of the escapement and running of the balance assembly. How is the hs looking when running ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there’s a beat error in one position that’s vastly different from the other positions, I would look at the hairspring shape, and whether it’s rubbing against something, or out of round. That has a tendency to cause a beat error when the hairspring is in a specific position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is showing 60° more amplitude CD than dial down. I suspect that the timegrapher reading could be in error (weak signal?). This could be causing incorrect amplitude and beat error being shown. (Similar to the problem I think I'm having in my recent post!)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

In the first photo the readings are all over the place, escapement issue ? Most noteably the amplitude is way up as well as the beat error increase. Another inspection of the escapement and running of the balance assembly. How is the hs looking when running ?

I studied the hairspring under a microscope while running (usually the first thing I do). Appears to run flat and without any visible distortion while swinging. Re it does seem to run high in CD position but this imposture captured it at the highest — normally closer to 250-260 when it settles down.

8 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Excessive side shake on balance staff.  

I’ll check later today—thanks for the suggestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

I think you will be able to visually see that in CD it's likely running a much lower amplitude- like half the 290. The machines sometime double the amplitude when things are noisy (like a guard pin rubbing, hint hint).

I just went through the checklist—will challenge my skills for sure—I’ve fouled more balance wheel and hairsprings trying to sort out issues (usually a non-flat hairspring) than actually fixed any—but I guess you have to jump in the pool if you’re going to learn to swim….. thanks 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I let it run through the night then gave it a full re-wind. Seems to have resolved itself. I'm going to assume oil hadn't set in or worked itself off some part of the escapement.

As before, running well in the other positions. 

Thanks to all (as a hobbyist, it's nice to have one work after servicing). 

 

P1020038.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Levine98 said:

I just went through the checklist—will challenge my skills for sure—I’ve fouled more balance wheel and hairsprings trying to sort out issues (usually a non-flat hairspring) than actually fixed any—but I guess you have to jump in the pool if you’re going to learn to swim….. thanks 

Absolutely levine, you cant learn if you dont do mate 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • The fact that the seconds runner starts running smoothly when you engage the chrono seconds makes me think the clutch is out of adjustment. That's a guess because I can't seem to find out too much about the chronograph module Breitling used on this model. On other Navitimers they used the Valjoux 7750 which had the running seconds on the left where the hand was mounted on an extended pivot on the fourth wheel. It looks to me that whatever pinion is driving that wheel is skipping teeth. Given that Breitling (et al) is not forthcoming with manuals or parts, I would send it back and ask for expedited service. They should be sufficiently embarrassed to do that for you at least.
    • Looks like someone forced in a screw that was bigger than the hole.  You would probably need to drill it out with a tungsten carbide rod sharpened at the tip to look like a spade drill. I'll see if I can find a video on how to make one. Start with a 0.5mm rod, then work your way up in 0.1mm increments until the walls of the hole weaken the screw enough to break it up.  This is a very time consuming, slow process. You'll need to centre the hole properly and not deviate. WD40 helps. The other option is to abandon the hole and use a dial dot. As much as I hate dial dots, this might be the safest option for a beginner.  Ok, found it.  
    • For those who are, curious I broke out the macro lens and took a few shots.  I'm attaching four of them: Image 1 is from the watchmaker's side and generally shows the problem area. Image 2 is a detail view of the offending dial foot hole (called out with the green circle), the tip of the offending screw (orange arrow) and the blue line indicates the approximate position of what's left of the head of the screw (determined by using an oiler as a feeler gauge to transfer that measurement to the visible portion of the plate.) Image 3 is looking down the screw hole you can see the head of the broken screw at the bottom. Image 4 is the same, but with less contrast to give a better appreciation of the condition of that end of the screw. I can almost convince myself that I can see the remains of the screw slot in the head, but I have to use alot of imagination in that exercise. Heard and understood.  There does appear to be a steel locating pin that can be seen in the lower, right center of Image 1 (right "above" the oval shaped slot that is to the left of where the pinion/clutch parts of the keyless works nestle into the plate.)  As I don't see a way to remove that I'd have to keep it out of the solution and have even contemplated dropping a little paraffin on it to give it a "rain coat" of sorts.  As I missed that before I did the closeup photos, I feel that I'm going to be looking at this plate in much greater detail to see if there anything else I might have missed. The screw assortments seem like a good acquisition.  The eBay seller who has the donor movements I was looking at never replied so I may just take a chance and get one of those as well a screw assortment.  They do seem like they'd be handy.  I have to confess that the idea of fabricating the needed screws appears to some deep part of my soul, I also have to confess that I do not yet have either the equipment, or the skill to use it.  Perhaps one day, but that day has not arrived (and I have alot of pricey bits and bobs that I will likely need to get along the way.) I thought about this, but the dial foot screw doesn't seem to be wide enough to get the thing out if I could advance it into the hole.  I suppose that I could try and take it out in pieces (advance it as far as it will go, get in there with some sort of saw, take a piece off, walk it forward again, take another piece, etc) but that seems like alot of risk to the main plate. I need to examine the other screw to ensure it doesn't have a shoulder or something that would prevent me from doing something like that.  However, all that said, I've been unable to get the thing to move at all. In general, this whole piece feels like someone had it before me, did a bad job of working on it and ultimately just bunged it all back together in a haphazard way and passed it on to be someone else's problem.
×
×
  • Create New...