Jump to content

Bodge job ...or not?


Solster

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

The movement in the photo below was only doing one strike at every hour in the same way as for the half hour. I realised that it was because the toothed arm was not dropping to the hour position at the point it should do as the activating arm was not quite clearing it. I'm thinking this is likely to be due to wear at multiple points and I imagine it would cost a lot of time and money to replace or repair them. So I think there are two simple solutions - either give the activating arm a little extra lift by placing the copper clip as show, or to bend the lug under it up slightly.

My general philosophy regarding 'found' clocks (at least for now) is to get them working again rather than return them to pristine condition. I'm also thinking that the copper is likely to rub through over a relatively short period of time, so a better quality clip would be ideal if possible. In conclusion, I think a tweak of the lug might be better! I respect and enjoy the beauty of old clocks, and don't want to bodge them, so as part of my learning process I'd be really interested to hear whether you think this kind of fix would be considered as such!

Please excuse the incorrect terminology used for the movement parts!

Thanks.

229877559_ENFIELDFIX2.jpg.45257d6a03d08c5249297782848fe3fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like a Smiths strike. Before you go bending anything and I advice you not to. You need to address the two obvious problems that I have circled in red, The one on the strike side and the escape wheel. Striking levers don't tend to wear, sometimes the teeth on the rack can cause problems but on your clock they look fine. I would remove that copper band as that is adding weight which is not needed. Remove all the leavers (the 3 dark blue) let the spring down on the strike side and check for wear in the pivot holes. Tell me what you find and get back. 

229877559_ENFIELDFIX2.jpg.45257d6a03d08c5249297782848fe3fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks OH, I think I get the message! Haha. Good point on the extra weight of the copper band, I hadn't considered that. It's very light, but even so. I'll have a go at what you suggest, although I dread to think what it will lead to! The movement has Enfield stamped on it, but I know they were linked with Smiths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes as OH says do not bend anything, that’s the worst thing you can do, it’s a mechanical machine that worked, now you need to find out why it doesn’t. As OH says look for wear around the post holes, you might even find the levers habe no correct lubrication on the posts.

i thorough inspection will expose the fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'll have a look for it, but don't hold your breathe. Failing that I'll make another video when another bezel needs to be removed.
    • The UK lots can be a 404 hit or miss, 6 - 10 watches can come in anywhere from 20 - 50 quid. I once had a 404 division of 8 watches for a fraction over 30 quid, one of them was a Smiths Astral model National 17 an absolute certainty for winner contender. The crystal was scrached up to the point of being very difficult to see the brand, something triggered a gut feeling in me and it paid off.
    • I just picked up this Mondaine quartz watch on tradera.com for £11. It's a non-runner so I will replace the Ronda movement (£10.95 at Cousins), polish the case, replace the case-back gasket, and replace the mineral crystal. Now, the problem is finding a suitable crystal. The original crystal is slightly domed (2.4mm thick dome), measures 36.4mm in diameter, and is 1.3mm thick at the edge. The closest I can get on CousinsUK is 36.5mm in diameter, 3.1mm thick dome, and 1.5mm thick at the edge. I think the replacement crystal would look OK, but the problem is finding a suitable glass gasket. The case diameter for the glass gasket is 36.9mm and the closest glass gasket I can find on CousinsUK is either 36.8x36.0mm or 37.0x36.2mm. I guess one of those glass gaskets could work but as you can see there's no way the 36.5mm domed crystal would fit the inner diameters of those glass gaskets. I guess I will have to give up on a domed crystal, no? So, the backup plan is to use a (1.5mm) thick flat mineral crystal as the diameters come in increments of 0.1mm. But, what glass gasket would be the better option? The one with an outer diameter of 36.8 (0.1mm too small) or the one with an outer diameter of 37.0mm (0.1mm too large). Again the case diameter for the glass gasket is 36.9mm. I believe I read or heard that the crystal diameter should be 0.1mm wider than the inner diameter of the glass gasket. Is that correct? I'm sorry for all the numbers. I've tried to make it as clear as I could. So, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. BTW, measuring and sourcing crystals and gaskets is extremely time-consuming! 😓
    • Lots to choose from... Just sayin'.
×
×
  • Create New...