Jump to content

Bodge job ...or not?


Solster

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

The movement in the photo below was only doing one strike at every hour in the same way as for the half hour. I realised that it was because the toothed arm was not dropping to the hour position at the point it should do as the activating arm was not quite clearing it. I'm thinking this is likely to be due to wear at multiple points and I imagine it would cost a lot of time and money to replace or repair them. So I think there are two simple solutions - either give the activating arm a little extra lift by placing the copper clip as show, or to bend the lug under it up slightly.

My general philosophy regarding 'found' clocks (at least for now) is to get them working again rather than return them to pristine condition. I'm also thinking that the copper is likely to rub through over a relatively short period of time, so a better quality clip would be ideal if possible. In conclusion, I think a tweak of the lug might be better! I respect and enjoy the beauty of old clocks, and don't want to bodge them, so as part of my learning process I'd be really interested to hear whether you think this kind of fix would be considered as such!

Please excuse the incorrect terminology used for the movement parts!

Thanks.

229877559_ENFIELDFIX2.jpg.45257d6a03d08c5249297782848fe3fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like a Smiths strike. Before you go bending anything and I advice you not to. You need to address the two obvious problems that I have circled in red, The one on the strike side and the escape wheel. Striking levers don't tend to wear, sometimes the teeth on the rack can cause problems but on your clock they look fine. I would remove that copper band as that is adding weight which is not needed. Remove all the leavers (the 3 dark blue) let the spring down on the strike side and check for wear in the pivot holes. Tell me what you find and get back. 

229877559_ENFIELDFIX2.jpg.45257d6a03d08c5249297782848fe3fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks OH, I think I get the message! Haha. Good point on the extra weight of the copper band, I hadn't considered that. It's very light, but even so. I'll have a go at what you suggest, although I dread to think what it will lead to! The movement has Enfield stamped on it, but I know they were linked with Smiths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes as OH says do not bend anything, that’s the worst thing you can do, it’s a mechanical machine that worked, now you need to find out why it doesn’t. As OH says look for wear around the post holes, you might even find the levers habe no correct lubrication on the posts.

i thorough inspection will expose the fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...