Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The watch came to me in bad shape...broken third wheel, pallet fork, escape wheel, staff, and twisted balance wheel.  The hands were also missing.  Somebody stuck a Craftsman screwdriver into it, no doubt...thinking they could repair it...lol.

Anyway, I found a replacement movement with hands and all, so I replaced the entire movement and kept the original dial.

Full service of the movement followed and I had some issues with the hairspring.  I got it running pretty true and was getting what I think is good amplitude--full 360 degree rotation.

But it was running slow.  Minimum throttle on the regulator and just way slow.  So I removed a pair of timing screws--the point of this post.  Notice in the picture that the screw I removed is a very bright brass whereas the other timing screws are a dull brass.  I assume brass in both cases.  Are these two screws different than the other timing screws?

They attached at the balance beam and I was going to leave them off and compensate for timing by adding timing screws in other locations.

Is this the best course of action?

2022-05-13 08_37_24-20220513_083357.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Posted

That looks like a meantime screw, should be a light friction fit on the threads, and is used to adjust the rate in addition to the regulator. Usually isn't screwed all the way in, should stay with the balance. Check other screws for timing washers and remove those, see how it does. If you need to remove weight still you can trim other screws as needed.

 

360 degrees isn't possible, were you looking at the timing machine's amplitude or the watch itself? The lift angle on some of these is quite low, even below 40; if you're set to 52 you'll get an artificially high reading.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, nickelsilver said:

360 degrees isn't possible, were you looking at the timing machine's amplitude or the watch itself? The lift angle on some of these is quite low, even below 40; if you're set to 52 you'll get an artificially high reading.

I took a slow motion video and will upload it shortly and provide a link.

 

3 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Usually isn't screwed all the way in

They were screwed all the way in and unusually tight.  Tried to just use a pin vise designed for this purpose, but they were too tight, so I used a screwdriver.  I will put them back in as you suggest.

Here is the video.

Posted

That's a full 360 rotation, but only 180 degrees amplitude, which is not that good at all.

Balance wheel amplitude is the angle of rotation from the neutral point (where the wheel would be sitting if the balance was at rest with no power on) and either one of its extremes of rotation (the point where it reverses direction), so half the total rotation from one extreme to the other.

If the amplitude was 360 then the balance would rotate a full 720 degrees from its extreme clockwise position to its extreme anticlockwise position, which as @nickelsilverpoints out, is impossible as the pallet fork would be in the way and hard up against the banking. You would get re-banking, with the impulse jewel crashing into the outside of the fork horns causing the balance wheel to rebound. Sounds like a galloping horse.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Marc said:

That's a full 360 rotation, but only 180 degrees amplitude, which is not that good at all.

Yeah, I recall seeing this definition, but had forgotten it.  Back to the drawing board.

BTW, I determined that it was running fast but measuring on my oscilloscope using my DIY sensor/amplifier.  I measure a full period so that any beat error is compensated.

I put the two timing screws back in and now the amplitude is reduced and the watch is timing slower.

Posted
4 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

what I think is good amplitude--full 360 degree rotation.

as others have stated 360° is a very undesirable amplitude. I think usually about 320 is the maximum because anything over he you will have bad things happen.

4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

360 degrees isn't possible, were you looking at the timing machine's amplitude or the watch itself? The lift angle on some of these is quite low, even below 40; if you're set to 52 you'll get an artificially high reading

yyes the problem of vintage watches they don't give us a lift angle.. Then yes from the ones that I've measured they can vary by quite a bit and it's really independent of their size.. The ones I've figured out range from anywhere from 38 to 62°..

tthen in addition to lift angle problem if you amplitude is super low often times the timing machine  will look at the middle part of the waveform and give you an abnormally high number. Which means visually your amplitude has to agree with the machine or the machine is having a problem..

 

4 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Notice in the picture that the screw I removed is a very bright brass whereas the other timing screws are a dull brass. 

then as others have pointed out that appears to be a mean time screw it's not supposed to ever come out. They're not supposed to be screwed in tight either but sometimes you find him that way. Another way to tell is usually the threaded part is longer. Then of course the thread dimensions are entirely different the usually much finer and are designed to stay in place hopefully. The word hopeful is because of they get played with too much they get loose.

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/15644188

obviously not your serial number but close enough. Being as it's a seven jewel watch of that size I'm suspicious as to whether it has a mean time screw or not? because usually mean time screws are associated with better grade balance wheels which would never be found on a seven jewel watch especially of this size. It's possible that somebody is mixing and matching  components before you  and shoving and whatever they had.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

They're not supposed to be screwed in tight either but sometimes you find him that way. Another way to tell is usually the threaded part is longer. Then of course the thread dimensions are entirely different the usually much finer and are designed to stay in place hopefully. The word hopeful is because of they get played with too much they get loose.

As noted earlier, they are very tight.  I have reinstalled them in the same location from where they came.  However, shortly after that I had to leave my little watch shop for a short trip.  Will get back to it on Sunday afternoon at the earliest. 

Now that I know what they are called, I found this forum thread is quite informative.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Posted

 Does this vid show the actual speed?   I wonder if its like a vid we had  before that wasn't a vid but some sort of GIF whatever and the speed looked abnormally slow. 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 Does this vid show the actual speed?   I wonder if its like a vid we had  before that wasn't a vid but some sort of GIF whatever and the speed looked abnormally slow. 

 

No, it is a slow motion video taken with my android phone. Super slomo.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
    • @ChrisInOz your not Chris as in Clickspring are you?🤪 looks similar to some solutions I have seen him do.   Tom
×
×
  • Create New...