Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I picked this Elgin up off eBay, the ruby's caught my eye.  It was sold as a non runner and it arrived as advertised, but it seems that the mainspring is broken.  If I manually put some tension on the barrel, it starts ticking.  As far as I can tell (thanks to the serial number) this is a grade 487 and should need a 4/0 mainspring...so that's on the way.  The case is really interesting as its made of such thin metal that appears to be plated.  The case back has an insert as well which I have not seen before.  Lots of watchmaker marks on there too!!

20220326_211921880_iOS.jpg

20220326_204728521_iOS.jpg

20220326_204715462_iOS.jpg

20220326_204740415_iOS.jpg

20220326_204752508_iOS.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

Question:

This says adjusted, but doesn't disclose how many adjustments !     

 How can we go about finding how many positions this actually is adjusted in,  sure it can be observed on TG  if a runner, so would on documents if available, but Is there any other approach to finding the answer? 

TIA 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hello Manx. Interesting watch. What size it looks smallish. The insert, if meaning curved rim around  the inside of the case back. To take up the space around the movement to stop it dancing about and damaging it. Also sometimes a sperate spacer with tabs inside the case, a later idea.

Posted
On 3/26/2022 at 9:35 PM, Manxcat said:

I picked this Elgin up off eBay, the ruby's caught my eye.  It was sold as a non runner and it arrived as advertised, but it seems that the mainspring is broken.  If I manually put some tension on the barrel, it starts ticking.  As far as I can tell (thanks to the serial number) this is a grade 487 and should need a 4/0 mainspring...so that's on the way.  The case is really interesting as its made of such thin metal that appears to be plated.  The case back has an insert as well which I have not seen before.  Lots of watchmaker marks on there too!!

20220326_211921880_iOS.jpg

20220326_204728521_iOS.jpg

20220326_204715462_iOS.jpg

20220326_204740415_iOS.jpg

20220326_204752508_iOS.jpg

Ranfft not listing 487. Some Internet is stating 1932 for your serial no.

Posted

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrIQhJ9gFpi988AaBR3Bwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwMEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1650127102/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.elginnumbers.com%2f/RK=2/RS=XqrjUmdGG_.jHi87PekGqejJpjE-

this is the elgin site and gives the data for the serial number on the plate.

Date 1932,    Size 4/0s,  Jewels 15/17,  Grade 487, Model 1, Production total 145,000, Hunter case, pendant wind set, case nickle Damaskeening,  going barrel,  adjusted  yes, 3/4 plate

Posted

You can look at your watch in the pocket watch database found at the first link below. Conveniently though they don't have a parts list like pocket watches do? But that's fine you go the second link and get your Elgin parts Numbers.

Then if you look at the parts list and you'll notice that you get a number and you get a thickness. One number can actually be several different mainsprings you need the thickness to get the right mainspring if you have a choice at all. At one time you had choices today it may be stuck with whatever you get. I snipped out an image to show you what I mean by that that's what was available at one time.

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/33575252

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

elgin 4789 ms.JPG

Posted

@JohnR725 In your above snip from the Elgin mainspring chart, I know what "steel" is as a material but what is the abbreviation "D.P." for? 

@Manxcat As John points out, you may not have a choice but it seems that yesterday I read somewhere that if you do have a choice you may want to replace an old spring with one slightly less powerful since it's likely that all of the rest of the watch is worn as well.

A fellow on a Facebook pocket watch forum suggested that I pick up a copy of the Elgin Materials Catalog. I found a copy and it's on the way. I suspect that it may be the source for some percentage of the material contained in the pocketwatchdatabase.

Posted
8 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

As John points out, you may not have a choice but it seems that yesterday I read somewhere that if you do have a choice you may want to replace an old spring with one slightly less powerful since it's likely that all of the rest of the watch is worn as well.

There is a prevailing theory that modern mainsprings are stronger for the exact same thickness of a steel mainspring. So the general rule is you would always go with the later spring today. The problem is there a less mainsprings available today.

For instance usually when I'm looking for mainsprings all look at the list of unattached to. It is by no means hundred percent perfect but because me a clue as to whether something's going to exist or not.

12 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

"D.P." for?

Each of the watch companies helmets and an Elgin for instance had their own alloys for hairsprings and mainsprings. So for instance at the link below you'll find dp stands for "Dura-Power", Elgin's 'unbreakable' mainsprings.

http://elginwatches.org/databases/mainspring_info.html

15 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

Elgin Materials Catalog.

Which year you getting?

Mainspring - DennisonChart.pdf Mainsprings security American pocket watch.PDF

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks John! I figured the Elgin catalogues were year-based. I'm guessing mine is a 1957. Do the newer books go way back for older parts?

Posted

this isn't a factory model from Elgin. its a replacement case offered by jewelers for when the original case had too much wear.

 

The catalogs that I know of

1888

1898

1914

1925/6 (this is the one that caused all the confusion about miss identifying grades and runs, they reclassified grades to simplify part replacements, this new look up tables were carried forward to the 1950 catalog)

1950

supplements that were mailed out from time to time to update the 1950 catalog)

1958 (This is the final catalog release)

supplements that were mailed out from time to time to update the 1958catalog, the last supplement I know of is 1964)

There is also the Elgin Casing book, released around 1958 and updated around 1963/64 (this is the book you use to replace hands, crystals, gaskets, crowns).

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

@diveboy Didn't see this before I sent my note. I'll be curious to see what's in the Elgin red book that I have on it's way.

Any ideas on finding cases for Elgins that have been stripped?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

sorry for the delay,  no not much of a chance with your model as both the case and dial have been swapped out, so it would be pot luck as to watch model the movement originally came from.

 

Posted
On 4/21/2022 at 4:20 PM, diveboy said:

The catalogs that I know of

@diveboy, how can you tell which one you have? The one I got has no date inside. The last page of the serial number and grades is page 36 and the last sequence of s/n's is: F937,001 to F999,999 for grade 662.

Handwritten on the price list is: 10-10-49 suggesting that the price list is older than that.

It also has a 20 page insert: Elgin Parts Interchangeability Chart

Posted
3 hours ago, grsnovi said:

how can you tell which one you have?

perhaps a picture of the catalog what does it look like and does it have any pictures of the Elgin parts or is it just purely a book of text?

Posted

Hi John,

Red textured cover with gold lettering. Ring binding. Pages are just tables of part numbers sorted by grade.

 

elgin book.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

That took some time...Mainspring, the mainspring was definitely broken in two...and the 4/0 was a perfect fit...but during reassembly I noticed the plates didn't really want to go back together so I looked closer...and found a broken jewel.  I got to looking a bit more and found another...so I got another movement.  I realize its not worth the work...but I liked it so I wanted to bring it back.  I rebuilt the new movement which had a bad jewel that the old movement had in good shape...a little swaping and I was in business.  Got the entire thing back together and put it on the timegrapher and it was looking GREAT...until I put it upside down at which point it stopped.  Through a little investigation, I noticed that the balance cock jewel was cracked in 4 directions and was also oblong.  At this point, I became a bit frustrated and set it aside for a few months. 

I had another jewel on the old movement...I was not comfortable changing it, so I hit pause...till today.  Today I finally took it out again, pulled the hairspring off of both assembles, pulled the jewels out, examined them and the old movement had a good jewel so I cleaned it, lubed it, and reassembled everything and threw it on the timegrapher!  It was pretty good right out the gate, I did have to speed it up just a smidge and I did check all directions.  Its not perfect...but it never was and never will be.  I am very happy with the results and threw it back in the case which looks pretty much exactly how it did above.

Meanwhile...I have discovered that vintage amp repair can use some watchmaking tools...who knew!!

20220905_192822592_iOS.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Happy to hear you had a positive outcome with that Elgin.

I'm waiting for a bench key and a 2nd grade 409 movement. The one I have has a nice dial and hands but blowing on the balance doesn't get anything going.

I'll probably open it up this weekend.

The grade 409 is a 7j movement, nothing special. The one I have already is from 1914.

(so, what watch tools are you using on vintage amps? my previous amp building efforts made me realize that handling a soldering pencil wasn't my strong suit. The Victoria in the closet hasn't been powered up in years.)

- Gary

Posted (edited)

Specifically, I was attempting to refurb some VU meters.  They are spring loaded with what looks like a hairspring and they have a jeweled bearing on the top and bottom of the pivot the meter moves on.  To be clear, my attempt was not successful...but I also didn't make it worse!! 

I also have a hobby addiction that is related to a tool addiction...so a few months of playing with receivers resulted in a new oscilloscope, a transistor tester, and a 100watt static load!!  The solder rework station and the Fluke meter...those I have had for years.  The most difficult thing so far was rewiring the tonearm in my Dual automatic record player...those things can make a crazy hum with old wires.  As difficult as that was to refurb, watches are still more challenging.

I have picked up another Elgin that looks like this one and a Robot that seems cut from the same thread! 

20220907_035822319_iOS.thumb.jpg.bfb651ea84fef5526a099ed449ec731c.jpg

The round watch movement is not as jeweled and does not work...probably the mainspring...seems like they are all broken.  The spare movement I bought for this project also had a broken mainspring.  I also messed with a Chinese 2650, a friends son had purchased a inexpensive pocket watch that stopped ticking.  It meant alot to him so I took a look. 

20220802_020100527_iOS.thumb.jpg.4f4146d8bb145e0a262effb026a928d5.jpg

The impulse jewel fell out!!  It was just gone, just a hole left...so I grabbed a balance off an $11 movement and got it ticking again.  He also had an Citizen Eco-Drive that the hands fell off of, easy fix there, and the band was falling apart.

20220726_035625694_iOS.thumb.jpg.b895bb9fd2596216bf02f84cf74d45f6.jpg

I do try to stay busy.

Edited by Manxcat
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Manxcat said:

I also have a hobby addiction that is related to a tool addiction...

Don't we all?

I still have a Peterson Strobe Tuner someplace...  🙂

1 hour ago, Manxcat said:

...my attempt was not successful...but I also didn't make it worse!! 

That's the best!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...