Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

So this is my first ever watch project as a very new newbie to watches. It's a 13s, 15 Jewel, 2 adjustment 'PILOT' movement out of a 1927 Aaron Lufkin Dennison silver open faced case.

So far I've stripped it, cleaned it, checked it, reassembled, lubricated it, replaced some missing screws and adjusted the hairspring as it had a 10.8ms beat error. My problem at the moment is it has such a low amplitude and needs a new mainspring. Is it a case of ripping the old one out and forcing it up against a ruler and taking all the measurements, or are they movement specific? 

While we are at it, does anyone know anything about this movement? I have done many google searches for 'pilot' but can only find one other example that was sold at auction a few years ago with no other information about it.

Many thanks, Charlie

Photo 16-02-2022, 23 13 54.jpg

Posted
13 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

It's a 13s

Do you mean 13"" (lignes). That is what Swiss mov.t use, not the American 's' system.

 

13 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

'PILOT' movement

I don't recognize that maker, but it seems very similar to Cyma below. Please post a dial side picture, as is  needed when identifying uncommon mov.s. 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&2&2uswk&Cyma_565

 

13 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

ripping the old one out and forcing it up against a ruler

Ripping and forcing don't apply to watchmaking. The mainspring is carefully removed from the barrel one coil at the time, avoiding any damage to it and yourself. Then, if it has to be measured in length that is done running a wire along it and measuring the latter. However when choosing by size the most important sizes before length (which can way a little) are barrel and arbor dia, height and thickness.

Also, be aware that is the watch has very low amplitude (you should post a picture or two in different positions), the most likely cause is not the mainspring but anything else.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, jdm said:

Do you mean 13"" (lignes). That is what Swiss mov.t use, not the American 's' system.

 

I don't recognize that maker, it seems very similar to Cyma below. Please post a dial side picture, as is  needed when identifying uncommon mov.s. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&2&2uswk&Cyma_565

 

Ripping and forcing don't apply to watchmaking. The mainspring is carefully removed from the barrel one coil at the time, avoiding any damage to it and yourself. Then, if it has to be measured in length that is done running a wire along it and measuring the latter. However when choosing by size  a catalog the most important sizes before length (which can way a little) are barrel and arbor dia, height and thickness.

Also, be aware that is the watch has very low amplitude (you should post a picture or two in different positions), the most likely cause is not the mainspring but anything else.

 

 

Hi JDM,

Thanks for your reply.

Yes, it says Swiss Made.

Thanks for the link, it has some similarities. Photo of the dial side below.

My apologies on using the term 'ripping and forcing' they were merely used as a description of action rather than their literal sense. 

It wants to come back to life and as soon as the balance is inserted it ticks away with no encouragement needed. If you give it a little twist it happily ticks away at 270 but then the amplitude slowly reduces and settles around 120 after 30 seconds or so.

BR. Charlie

 

Photo 17-02-2022, 09 47 39.jpg

Photo 17-02-2022, 09 48 11.jpg

Photo 17-02-2022, 09 48 31.jpg

Photo 17-02-2022, 09 48 45.jpg

Posted
35 minutes ago, jdm said:

Also, be aware that is the watch has very low amplitude (you should post a picture or two in different positions), the most likely cause is not the mainspring but anything else.

 

 

This is 99.9% the case for amplitude problems- in my experience it's rarely the mainspring. From the pic, the balance could be very much out of beat- the balance arms are supposed to be perpendicular to the line along the fork and escape wheel when at rest; it could be in beat, and someone installed the roller table without aligning it. That's one possible source of amplitude loss. Some others:

-hairspring rubbing

-excessive or insufficient endshakes

-wear (in general), in particular at the bearing points of the center wheel and barrel

-escapement out of adjustment

-damaged or worn pivots

-wear in the fork slot, fork pivot holes not perfectly clean (must peg them), debris on the roller jewel, roller jewel not vertical, chipped pallet stone(s)

and probably a dozen other possible things

 

With the balance and fork out (let down the power first!) put a few clicks of wind on it and see how the train moves. It should spin freely, and when it stops, ideally the escape wheel will reverse direction at least a little bit, or even a couple of turns. Now put the fork in, few clicks of wind, and see if it snaps from banking to banking cleanly with a slight nudge. That's a basic check, if it looks good, you can concentrate in the balance area.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

This is 99.9% the case for amplitude problems- in my experience it's rarely the mainspring. From the pic, the balance could be very much out of beat- the balance arms are supposed to be perpendicular to the line along the fork and escape wheel when at rest; it could be in beat, and someone installed the roller table without aligning it. That's one possible source of amplitude loss. Some others:

-hairspring rubbing

-excessive or insufficient endshakes

-wear (in general), in particular at the bearing points of the center wheel and barrel

-escapement out of adjustment

-damaged or worn pivots

-wear in the fork slot, fork pivot holes not perfectly clean (must peg them), debris on the roller jewel, roller jewel not vertical, chipped pallet stone(s)

and probably a dozen other possible things

 

With the balance and fork out (let down the power first!) put a few clicks of wind on it and see how the train moves. It should spin freely, and when it stops, ideally the escape wheel will reverse direction at least a little bit, or even a couple of turns. Now put the fork in, few clicks of wind, and see if it snaps from banking to banking cleanly with a slight nudge. That's a basic check, if it looks good, you can concentrate in the balance area.

Many thanks nickelsilver, appreciate your input. Will try all that tonight.

BR. Charlie

Posted
8 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

My apologies on using the term 'ripping and forcing' they were merely used as a description of action rather than their literal sense. 

None is due and please excuse my pedantry, we can all talk tongue in cheek and I just have done and seen too much damage so stilI trying to make saves. Good luck with sorting thus out. 

Posted
15 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

I make the diameter 40.66 mm

I have looked all the matching mov.ts on Rannft and none is like this, perhaps you should send your pics to him together with the usual data he publishes. 

Posted

@JohnR725A Weishi 1900 with the Lift angle set at 44 (a guess). Just placed it on to get pics for you, except this time it didn't get above 186 to begin with.

Wind it up, and it starts with no encouragement needed. First pic is within the first 30 or so seconds and then this happens?!

 

Photo 18-02-2022, 12 25 49.jpg

Photo 18-02-2022, 12 27 04.jpg

Posted
9 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

Weishi 1900

 

On 2/16/2022 at 3:31 PM, Skyfiller said:

10.8ms beat error

The reason I asked what you're using is that according to the manual for the machine which am currently looking at just to refresh my memory it's the same as the Swiss machines the maximum beat error that you can measure is 9.9 ms and they would've been nice to get a picture of 10.8 as you supposedly can't do that?

Visually what is the balance wheel look like versus what the timing machine is saying? In other words when it goes to the lower amplitude can you see a decrease in amplitude below hundred and 30° is really bad and should be very visibly it's very bad

Have a couple more pictures? Wind the watch up place it in a crown up position time like you said 30 seconds after you wound it up then wait 15 minutes and give us a second picture of what you're getting.

Normally even with a set mainspring you can run a watch it's not got run over night but you should build a run the watch a shouldn't see a decrease in amplitude like that that fast your losing a heck of a lot of power someplace and as I said the old mainspring should work.

On 2/17/2022 at 2:06 AM, nickelsilver said:

-wear (in general), in particular at the bearing points of the center wheel and barrel

It looks like from the pictures that everything else has jewels for bearings although the quality of this watch suggests the quality the jewels will not be spectacular. But the center wheel doesn't look like it has a jewel and definitely look at that carefully. Especially the dial side is often that's thinner than the other side. If the mainspring barrel doesn't mesh properly with the center wheel pinion Because things are out around that's definitely going be an issue.

 

Posted

Thanks @JohnR725that's all really helpful information and I'll have a try over the weekend at what you suggest and take pics.

43 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

The reason I asked what you're using is that according to the manual for the machine which am currently looking at just to refresh my memory it's the same as the Swiss machines the maximum beat error that you can measure is 9.9 ms and they would've been nice to get a picture of 10.8 as you supposedly can't do that?

I'm pretty sure that's what it said when it first started working but you've got me doubting myself now......🤨 Looking back at the photos the only one I can find is one that says 9.8ms???? I can remember thinking to myself, 'damn... double figures'!!!.... I think I'm loosing the plot here, long week. You've got a million + times more experience in this as this is the first ever watch I've taken apart so I'm going to go with your correct and I was in never never land that day. Everyday is a school day 🙂

C.

 

Photo 08-02-2022, 21 09 29.jpg

Posted

All of the timing machines have their peculiar characteristics And either will show up peculiar things or refused to give you answers. Witschi machines typically for things out of range or words confused it will actually say or give it a cryptic message know it's not going to give you anything. That means you have to start changing settings in the machine to force it to tell you something. In other words taken out of the auto range mode and expands so it can give you something

or the 1000 version Chinese machine if it goes over and the graphical display because it's so small and waxy rollover and still be visible on the display so you can see things it looks like the watches in beat for instance in real life it's grossly out of beat. But usually the numeric display will tell you that Solis tell you it's 9 ms and somebody look at the graphical display of cents fine when it's not

one of the reasons I point out that problem is for the timing machine to really show you correct data the graphical display has to look decent otherwise numeric display may not be telling you the truth. So with the last picture you show the one line that looks really really bad and it does look like it's way far apart on the lines it probably is really nine point whatever milliseconds but when you have one really bad line like that it's going to make it hard for the machine to give you proper amplitude for instance so I would actually question whether the amplitude is right or not.

How do curiosity do you know what she did to make the one line that looks so horrible look better? Usually that's the indication of one side of the escapement's would be one pallet stone. Or something related to that I've even seen with a roller jewel which is common to both sometimes it can wobble and it only shows up on one line.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Hi all,

Sorry for late reply, life took over and have been busy with Mark's course. Half way through the second course and thoroughly enjoying it.

On 2/19/2022 at 12:09 AM, JohnR725 said:

How do curiosity do you know what she did to make the one line that looks so horrible look better? Usually that's the indication of one side of the escapement's would be one pallet stone. Or something related to that I've even seen with a roller jewel which is common to both sometimes it can wobble and it only shows up on one line.

Unfortunately @JohnR725 not a clue!

 Received some L&R clean and rinse on Friday and thought I'd give it a go. Up until now I've been using Naptha (lighter fluid) and IPA. WOW.... what a difference, worth every penny. Anyway, totally stripped the movement again and washed in L&R Extra Fine and then 2 rinses in L&R Ultrasonic Watch Rinse, pegged, lubricated etc and ended up with this 🙂

 

517604436_Photo25-02-2022222225.thumb.jpg.d26f378bab750bccd2de18a6ec3f0ce1.jpg

Has been running for 3 days now in various positions with any gain unnoticeable and this is her reading on the Weishi. It is not perfect but she is running constantly now and at this stage I can't ask for any more than that. I guess that something was not perfectly aligned in the movement before or there was a hidden piece of dirt lurking about!

608696852_Photo25-02-2022204533.thumb.jpg.3ebc75d28508d4d3ca1431c4d3d54f1e.jpg

 

A massive thank you to everyone that helped above. I've really enjoyed my first watch and looking forward to many new projects when I've finished Mark's courses. 

So what have I learnt that might help newcomers?

Check, check and triple check your work is something is not right.

Do NOT bother with cheap Chinese tweezers. I started with a set of 6 sold as watchmakers tweezers and have spent a few hours on my knees with a diving magnet during this project. In the end bought a second hand pair off of e-bay from a watchmakers estate for £3 and what a difference, not pretty but they are a joy to use 🙂 

1843950852_Photo01-03-2022102014.thumb.jpg.ef25a28b6f22d91cb433d110a72bba73.jpg

You can never have enough trays with dust covers.

Proper cleaning solutions and rinses are worth the money. If nothing else the movement comes out nice and shiny how you want it to look after you have cleaned it.

Probably one of the most important things I've learnt is have a nice working environment. When I started on this project I was working on my home office desk with a keyboard in front of me and clutter everywhere. After watching Mark's first videos I decided to clear a wall in the office and put in a dedicated bench with good lighting. It's now a pleasure to work on a watch, rather than having to move mounds of paperwork out of the way.

BR, Charlie

 

Edited by Skyfiller
missed a '
  • Like 3
Posted

Nice work.  I am coming to the realization that there is no substitute for proper cleaning fluids. 

Keep those cheap tweezers so you can learn to tune and sharpen them.  They can be made to be useful with a good tune up.  They will never be as good as Dumont but they will work much better. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
×
×
  • Create New...