Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone! I've been trying to fix my father's watch for two years, it is a Seiko caliber 7T32-7E10 and they told me I have to change the movement. The thing is that the supplier Seiko for the Netherlands and Belgium does not have the parts. Any advice? It is very important to me. Thanks.

Posted
2 hours ago, Victoriaamsterdam said:

The thing is that the supplier Seiko for the Netherlands and Belgium does not have the parts. 

Have a read of our pinned topic below which contains all the common answers you may get here.

 

Posted

There are no more 7T32 movements.  You will need to repair it.  It is commonly said these movements are not repairable and must always be replaced, but this is not true.  They are hard to repair and not valuable, so it is not cost effective.  Seiko will not do it for you.

I don't think you can buy new parts anywhere.  Certainly not the most valuable part: the circuit board.

So you will need to find a working 7T32 from ebay to get parts from.

But first, identify your problem.  What exactly is wrong?  Do any buttons work?  Any of the dials?  How about the functions to center the chrono hands?  Did you reset the movement after changing the battery?

Do you see evidence of a leaking battery after opening the watch up?  This is probably the most common failure.  It will destroy the circuit board and they are almost impossible to repair after this.  Thus the circuit board is the most valuable part.

Be warned, if you do more than take the battery cover off (the plate with the two biggest screws, says Seiko 7T32B) that this is not an easy movement to put back together!  And the coils will be damaged if you hit them with a screw driver.

PXL_20210206_040515143.thumb.jpg.11a55feb401949ba6f5fab241e49a393.jpg

IMG_20191207_172726.thumb.jpg.0728fba546c38aae6f455f9e9ee719e1.jpg

Posted

Hi the pulsar 182Y is the same movement and sometimes turn up on ebay and cheaper than a working t32. there are others which use the same movement If I can findout where I put the information  I will post it.

Posted

Hi Just a thought    "The Watch Site" is exclusivly seiko, citizen and every thing from the Hattori.seiko/epson factory,  I should sign in there and place a post request there they have some very knowledgable Seiko Geeks there.   It will widen tour search.

Posted
5 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi the pulsar 182Y is the same movement and sometimes turn up on ebay and cheaper than a working t32. there are others which use the same movement If I can findout where I put the information  I will post it.

While it is true the Y182 is the same movement, I haven't found them to be cheaper.  I've been buying these for some time now, and the Y182s are rarely cheap.  They aren't the handful of desirable models that fetch the most money, but you rarely see them for < $25.

It's possible the OP doesn't need a new movement.  That's just the default response with these movements.  New battery, doesn't work == needs new movement.  They don't even try to figure out what's wrong.

I have many parts to repair these movements.  The circuit board is really the only one that's hard to come by.  The only thing I really see fail on it's own is that and the date pusher wheel.   The bad pivots I attribute to ham fisted repair attempts.  One must carefully line up 16 tiny pivots simultaneously to get the cover back on.  But that's not that hard part.  Getting all seven hands back on, and aligned with the indices, without scratching the dial is the hard part.  Unlike a mechanical movement, a quartz movement's train has backlash, so just because the hand is aligned when you put it on doesn't mean it will be aligned once the watch starts to tick and takes up the backlash.

Posted
9 hours ago, xyzzy said:

There are no more 7T32 movements.  You will need to repair it.  It is commonly said these movements are not repairable and must always be replaced, but this is not true. 

Are we talking about the A or B version? Then what's interesting is for a throwaway watch that can't be serviced why is there a technical sheet for it? I thought usually when things aren't supposed to be serviced they don't have service sheets I've seen this with citizen for instance. When you finally do find the service sheet it says send it to us don't even think of touching it. Here they show how to disassemble it and they  even give you part numbers which yes I know doesn't mean they actually exist but they claim they exist or might have existed at one time perhaps?

7T32A.pdf

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi   I have two T32b's both have cct board problems and managed to get hold of a pusar Y182b with the intention of swapping it out cost £30 but decided to leave it alone and scrap the T32b's. I investigated other makes for the T32b and found they were fitted to several makes, Pulsar and Zema and the seiko YM62. I have found personally that the T32B movement was  dearer than the alternatives but not always.  The YM52 is interchangeable with the T32b  but it is probably in short supply now as well.

Posted
56 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Then what's interesting is for a throwaway watch that can't be service

Well, these weren't really throwaway watches, used to cost about EUR 200 when new.

 

56 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

 why is there a technical sheet for it?

I think because that a sort of "industrial must" for a Japanese company. In all sectors Japanese always had excellent technical documentation, no matter how expensive the product.

 

56 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

 they  even give you part numbers which yes I know doesn't mean they actually exist but they claim they exist or might have existed at one time perhaps?

 

Maybe the official service center swapped the mov.t right away when returned within warranty, but I think that  board, coil and some breakable wheels were available for a while.

Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Are we talking about the A or B version?

I would assume the B.  I think the A was used very little in 1988 and 1989.  From the reference number of the T732-7E10, either SDWB61 or SDWB91, it was likely not an early model by any means, as it would be approximately the 1161th or 1191th reference allocated in the SDW range, and so would surely be using the 7T32B movement.

I have only three 7T32A, all purchased "broken", from which I have assembled two fully functional watches.  I think the two working are SDW008 and SDW010, the 8th and 10th references (approximately).  By the time we get to 1990 and a SDW054 it is already 7T32B.

The A & B are very similar, despite not looking much alike, as mostly it is the design of the covers that has changed.  Some parts are interchangeable between them, but not the circuit board.

If we look at current ebay SOLD auctions, cheapest price + shipping for 7T32B is $15.49, $19.40, $19.81, $20.50, etc.  But for Y182 it is $33.55, $75.70, and then we are mostly in the $75-$100 range.  There is maybe a tenth the Y182 as 7T32.  For YM52, there is but a single watch in the sold history, over $90.

One of those four cheap 7T32Bs was purchased by me.  What luck, it had a good circuit board!  They put the case back on upside down and it interfered with the stems.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...