Jump to content

Finding the correct mainspring


SndChsr

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I'm working on an old cylinder movement watch. I have no idea who made it, where it came from or how old it is. There are no markings on the dial or any of the movement plates/parts. It appears to be mid 19th century. The mainspring however has lost pretty much all its elasticity. Out of the barrel it looks pretty much the same as it would inside the barrel, but after 200yrs or so, that's to be expected.

I'm having issue locating a replacement. I have measured it and these are the dimensions (metric):

Height - 2.24mm

Strength - .20mm

Barrel Diameter - 16mm

Hole End 

Could somebody point me towards finding such mainspring, or is there an alternative that would work?

Thank you for any help with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You forgot to mention the length of the spring? Then the 2.24 mm is not going to find that it looks like it's going to be 2.20 mm looking in the mainspring catalog. Then finding a replacement mainsprings for watches made before anything resembling Standards can be a challenge. Somewhere are likely off till longer spring and put a hole in it yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John. So correct me if I'm wrong please. I thought that the length of the spring can be substituted by the measurement of the spring barrel diameter(?) where then a selection of the spring fills only 1/3rd of the barrel. 

In order to measure the length of the mainspring, I would have to straighten the spring out, and if that's the case, the spring would be ruined completely, and if no replacement is found, I would not be able to even use the original spring, as much a bad shape it is in.

Is there a safe way to measure the length of the mainspring?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SndChsr said:

I thought that the length of the spring can be substituted by the measurement of the spring barrel diameter(?) where then a selection of the spring fills only 1/3rd of the barrel. 

Yes there are formulas but I is find it easier if I have the existing spring to measure it. If you're worrying about destroying it which in your case you definitely should be then well I guess will have a problem. Usually in stretch it a little bit as I would rather go with the length of the original spring. But before you get worried about things that the carbon steel spring and the modern Springs are different and depending upon who you talk to most of us think the modern Springs are stronger so you want to go for a lighter spring perhaps.

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

catalogue for GR mainspring

This is one of the things you want to have because when I looked up your width I went here and that's what I discovered you can't have the fractional millimeter and there's a page plus of mainsprings within the strength range you need but I couldn't tell about the length.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Yes there are formulas but I is find it easier if I have the existing spring to measure it. If you're worrying about destroying it which in your case you definitely should be then well I guess will have a problem. Usually in stretch it a little bit as I would rather go with the length of the original spring. But before you get worried about things that the carbon steel spring and the modern Springs are different and depending upon who you talk to most of us think the modern Springs are stronger so you want to go for a lighter spring perhaps.

This is one of the things you want to have because when I looked up your width I went here and that's what I discovered you can't have the fractional millimeter and there's a page plus of mainsprings within the strength range you need but I couldn't tell about the length.

 

Thanks again John. Much appreciate your detailed answer. I'll give it some thought regarding the length of the spring. I may have no option but to destroy it in order to get the correct length. 

Many thanks for everyone's generous replies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, SndChsr said:

 I may have no option but to destroy it in order to get the correct length. 

That's never necessary. There are formulas to calculate length when it's in the barrel e.g. https://theindex.nawcc.org/CalcMainspringLength.php

And when it's outside just use a cotton thread along it.

Anyway, a difference like 5% in normally negligible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, jdm said:

That's never necessary.

A unfortunate problem In watch repair is accidents happen. But there is no need to deliberately Destroy something to figure out the length of the mainspring. I suspected somebody would come along and point you in the direction of the formula  which will get you close and you don't have to be that close.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

A unfortunate problem In watch repair is accidents happen. But there is no need to deliberately Destroy something to figure out the length of the mainspring. I suspected somebody would come along and point you in the direction of the formula  which will get you close and you don't have to be that close.

 

Looks like JDM just did! 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, jdm said:

That's never necessary. There are formulas to calculate length when it's in the barrel e.g. https://theindex.nawcc.org/CalcMainspringLength.php

And when it's outside just use a cotton thread along it.

Anyway, a difference like 5% in normally negligible.

Sorry for sounding like a dunce but on that calculator, are the measurements in millimeters? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SndChsr said:

Sorry for sounding like a dunce but on that calculator, are the measurements in millimeters? 

Millimeters, or English system, o French lignes, or that special unit that Americans used for their mainspring, we are technical people and must be able to figure out and convert as necessary. Otherwise it can happen like the current UK gov.t did to justify restoring the old system: "people doesn't know how much a pound of apple cost".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2021 at 6:01 AM, jdm said:

Millimeters, or English system, o French lignes, or that special unit that Americans used for their mainspring, we are technical people and must be able to figure out and convert as necessary. Otherwise it can happen like the current UK gov.t did to justify restoring the old system: "people doesn't know how much a pound of apple cost".

Haha...that's what I thought. Looks like the correct length would be 460mm, or 46cm. Sounds about right. Thanks for helping with this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello good watch folk ,I  just fancied a light hearted discussion after my head was starting to spin over Epilame 😅. Specifically I'm meaning the sale of vintage watches, say nothing past the 1980s market. The stuff we see on ebay and other similar sites and found at carboots, curio shops etc. And are  we thinking its reaching a peak volume ?  Younger generations clearing out passed parents and grandparents possessions.  The younger folk are not as sentimental as the old fogies ( I'm now nearly at an age that i used to think was old fogie age ). When might it have started ?  i often wish i discovered the hobby much much sooner when selling your grandfathers pocket watch at a boot sale for a few quid was just a way to offload some tat. And when might it slow down. Thoughts anyone ?
    • Yes i did eventually realise that the oil will act as a barrier, I'm sure the discussion will continue. Ive had two oleophobic coffees ( added coconut ) and in the meantime i have this just delivered to take my mind off epilame for the time being. My favourite type of dial, its a beautiful looking watch traditional English made and it runs,  the ticktock is phenomenal,  i can hear it across my living room .  You wont believe how much it was. Thats interesting about synthetic oils , i thought the same, going from a 2 year service to 5 years is a big drop in income for service folk.  I expect some did well when they embraced the use of synthetic,  probably drawing in more customers than those that didn't use the new fangled substances , i bet fairly short lived though. The more frequent service makes more sense to me, not for just the service but for the regular check up inspections that might pick up impending faults. As far as epilame goes, wouldn't it be great to be able to fumigate the complete movement in a sealed jar of heated stearic acid, 🤔 now theres a thought 😅.
    • Imm going to close the discussion by attaching the photo of my super-titanium after several vicissitudes finally working. Purchased as not working I replaced the battery and for a stroke of luck I found its semi-new solar panel which, having verified its operation, seems to recharge the accumulator perfectly. I had taken this watch almost by bet, with 40 euros I brought it back to life. The initial half idea was to resell it to finance another purchase, but.. it's definitely a nice item. It would need to check the impermeability but it's a pleasure to see it on the wrist 😃
    • In fact the secret is to go gently and find the way without forcing, and the movement enters without problems
    • Yea a have given it a full service this movement is chinese 2813 whats the lift angle for this movement does anyone knows  and how  do a remove the default  of 52 degrees on my timegrapher?   Hi you said my lift angle is default how do a remove this from my timegrapher?
×
×
  • Create New...