Jump to content

ETA2801-2 low amplitude, running slow


scarab

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I have a problem with my ETA2801-2. Initially the watch was running great, but it was skipping while winding. I guess I made a mistake and pulled the train bridge in order to check the mainspring, afterwards I figured that wasn’t necessary. Anyway, after putting everything back together it was running with low amplitude and became impossible to regulate to anything over -120spd. I decided to pull the bridge again, and clean all associated parts in ultrasonic, and re-lubricate. Unfortunately nothing has changed, it still runs with low amplitude - about 230 and there is no way to make it run any faster than -120spd. What could be the reason behind it? Here is how it looks like on a time grapher. 

0916702C-FFC8-49DC-A8C2-A1ADE075CFD0.jpeg

D8B53706-F8E2-4E68-9494-CB5EB7D54D5D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Apparently you are sure you had better amplitude before. As Clockboy says, hairspring out of  regulator slot slows  the rate but you should get larger amplitude instead. 

Something might be rubbing,  barrel lid is to sit flush level at wall of the barrel, all arbours should have a little free play, very specially balance staff. in case end stomes are slightly pushing on pivots, you get low amplitude and slow rate.

If adjustment of the pallets aren't anything to be proud of, then oscilation can be poor. Did you put the fork or balance in ultrasonic too? 

Regs 

Joe

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before I put my hands on it it was running great, with +-3 spd and correct amplitude so I definitely messed up or broke something. The only problem it initially had was skipping while winding. It still has problem with winding but I bet that’s caused by winding yoke. In order to isolate the issue I removed the clutch/crown wheel and wound it with a screwdriver. I’m not sure if the clickspring provides the correct tension but that shouldn’t be causing amplitude/accuracy issues, correct? 

Yes, I put the balance and the fork in ultrasonic as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did Zippo lighter fluid for the wheels, bridge, balance and fork and then followed with IPA for everything except balance and fork as I was concerned about shellac 🙂 It’s not about the wash as it was behaving exactly the same after I reassembled it for the first time, before I did the wash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, scarab said:

I did Zippo lighter fluid for the wheels, bridge, balance and fork and then followed with IPA for everything except balance and fork as I was concerned about shellac 🙂 It’s not about the wash as it was behaving exactly the same after I reassembled it for the first time, before I did the wash.

I see. So what is the end shake on balance staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, scarab said:

Dang, I didn’t know that, I hope I haven’t ruined it. Then what is the best affordable cleaning solution for balance and pallet fork? 

 

Lighter fluid is OK if you are cleaning by hand, but not in ultrasonic. I discovered that the expensive way.

As for cleaning solutions there is a very very long thread right on this here forum, more helpful than I can possibly be in one post.

Regs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, rodabod said:

Are you by any chance trying to regulate using the fine regulator adjustment rather than move if the arm which carries the index pins directly?

I tried both. I can go slower by regulating with the arm but not much faster than -120spd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Some balance pivots tend to vanish in ul1trasonic, some don't.

 

Well, I hope I was lucky this time. I already let this watch run for a couple of days hoping the amplitude will get better. I haven’t noticed any improvement but at least it didn’t got any worse so maybe shellac is still in place. I will take your advice and do some more research. I was aware IPA is a no go for balance, just didn’t know about lighter fluid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scarab said:

Well, I hope I was lucky this time. I already let this watch run for a couple of days hoping the amplitude will get better. I haven’t noticed any improvement but at least it didn’t got any worse so maybe shellac is still in place. I will take your advice and do some more research. I was aware IPA is a no go for balance, just didn’t know about lighter fluid. 

Have you checked all the jewel holes for dirt, and pivots to see if they are fine? Since you only had the issue after disassembling, and reassembling before cleaning (and even after cleaning and re-lubrication) it doesn’t seem to be due to oiling. Maybe something got caught in the jewel hole, or one of the pivots got damaged?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rodabod said:

Can you check the end-shake of the balance? Let down the mainspring and then grab the rim carefully and lift/drop. 

I’ve seen jewel holes move when cleaning in the past. 

If you are test the end-shake of the balance in this way, wouldn't you only be able to see the (potential) movement of the jewel hole on the balance cock side? Seems quite difficult to manipulate the balance wheel if the dial side of the movement is facing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
    • Probably easier to get a complete new movement - but CousinsUK list it as discontinued. Maybe someone on here knows a substitute movement ?
×
×
  • Create New...