Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is a question about the lubrication of 2 particular sites- whether to or not. It is NOT a question about which lubricant to use.

The sites are:

 

1. the  spikey teeth of the clutch (not the flat teeth that engage with the winding pinion)

2. the teeth of the winding pinion

 

In the image I've drawn green arrows to show where I mean.

ETA and Seiko tech manuals indicate that you should lubricate these 2 sites.

I have serviced hundreds of movements and never lubricated either of them.

Mark does not lubricate either (according to his videos of ETA 2824 service and AS 1900 service)

 

Any thoughts?

 

 

lubrication1.jpg

Posted

I didn't lubricate them, too. But considering the less perfect meshing of those teeth and axes at right angles, it might be a good idea.

Frank

Posted

We were taught in school to lubricate the clutch teeth, the angled "Breguet teeth", but not the others. I imagine that oiling the teeth on the winding pinion wouldn't be an issue, but oiling the teeth of the sliding pinion that engage the setting wheels would spread oil all the way to the canon pinion. But if the tech guide says do it, do it.

Posted
7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

spread oil all the way to the canon pinion. But if the tech guide says do it, do it.

thinking about spreading the oil maybe were supposed to use something to prevent that? I went quickly looked at Rolex, eta and omega snipped out the relevant images. You can see some do some don't . Typically on any of the newer ETA stuff you'll see that weird little symbol indicating surface treating.  omega now recommends that almost everything in the watches surface treat. I think is only a couple of things don't surface treat.

ml--3.JPG

ml--2.JPG

ml--1.JPG

Posted

Being new to watches but an old engineer by trade I follow the old rule of all metal to metal moving surfaces need lubrication, if it spins use oil, if it rubs or slides use grease, so I grease all the above parts, I use the dark blue Mobeus one (can't remember the number and not at my bench).

 

Paul

Posted
37 minutes ago, Paul80 said:

Being new to watches but an old engineer by trade I follow the old rule of all metal to metal moving surfaces need lubrication,

what about gears? We have a gear train in the watch that's metal on metal should the gears be lubricated?

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...