Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Howdy gang,

Need help with a little problem I'm having.  Working on a 1930 Elgin 12s pocket watch that had a broken balance staff pivot.  I need to remove the cap jewel so I can test the fit of the new staff in the jewel hole.  I've removed the screws but have been unable to get the cap off.  Looks like it may have been a tight fit from the get go and someone pressed it in before inserting screws.  I included the dime in the picture to show scale of what I'm working with.  There's no gap that I can find to pry on and rodico doesn't work.  I tried some sticky tape but no luck.  Any suggestions on how I can grab it?  Not sure how much effort it's going to take to dislodge it. Don't want to damage it.

capJewel.jpg

Posted

These are a light press fit, along with a setting below holding the hole jewel. It should be pressed out from the underside. They used to sell star shaped tools with different diameter brass pieces  that were used for pushing out these jewels. If you have a jeweling tool that's perfect.  But pegwood works fine except for very stubborn ones

Posted

Be very careful. I've broken one before. Your staking tool must rest on the brass chaton, not on the jewel. If you have a Seitz jewelling tool, that's even better.

Over tightening of the 2 retaining screws could have deformed the chaton but I believe that the brass chaton deformed over time due to molecular creepage and became stuck. Some of these pocketwatches are over a hundred years old! 

Posted

Would the upper jewel set in the balance cock be pressed in the same way?  I removed the screws from it also just for cleaning and oiling and it doesn't want to come apart either.

Posted

It varies. Sometimes the screws are on the underside of the balance cock and you'd have to unpin the hairspring and remove the balance wheel to get to it. It's a real PITA. Never understood why they were designed that way.

Posted
43 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

It varies. Sometimes the screws are on the underside of the balance cock and you'd have to unpin the hairspring and remove the balance wheel to get to it. It's a real PITA. Never understood why they were designed that way.

Except for really cheap and/or cylinder movements you can release the stud, no need for unpinning the hairspring. Most non-shockprotected watches have the hole jewel in the cock, cap jewel set in a disc that holds the regulator, screws from underneath. Really old and pocket watches, screws from the top sometimes; American and Swiss emulators, with screwed down settings for both cap and hole.

Posted

Just to update the group, I was able to remove the jewel set by pushing from the hole side.  Both popped out without incident.  I found an Elgin Watchmaker class PDF on line that showed how it's put together.  I want to thank nickelsilver for pointing me in the right direction.

elgin.JPG

  • Like 3
  • 7 months later...
Posted

I had to remove a cap jewel today and only found this thread after the fact.  In my case, the cap jewel was not so stuck, but it was stubborn.  I wondered about pushing from below as described in this thread, but ultimately was successful popping out the cap jewel.  In the future, I will put my Seitz to work and press the whole thing out.

  • Like 1
  • 7 months later...
Posted

I had my first of these today. I assumed I'd be able to just lift it out with Rodico and & was very disappointed to find that didn't work. I really hoped I wouldn't have to remove the balance from the balance cock, as I had already messed up another one last weekend in that operation (though the 18s Elgin hairspring stud is far bigger and easier to work with).

Anyway I couldn't get it out, found this thread and removed the balance. The jewels pushed right out with pegwood. I cleaned them, and reinserted the cap jewel upside down. This had two noticeable effects: 1) one of the screws sheared off half its head and the other wouldn't catch threads because they could not drive in flush, and 2) the balance would only run dial-down, visibly falling a solid half-mm when flipped into dial up. This would have been a 5 minute job if I had put it together right the first time. Instead it was 25min and I learned some things.

Posted

I was just going to start a new thread to ask a similar question, but since you've already got one, I hope it's okay to piggyback.

I have an Incablock style shock setting from a Bulova movement, and the cap stone is stuck firmly to the hole jewel. It's gunky enough that it stops the balance from turning!

If I don't have anything thin enough to poke through the hole jewel, any other options for prizing them apart? I've tried soaking in solvent and a run through the ultrasonic, then Rodico, then sticky tape.

Sure looks neat, though.

eye.thumb.png.65dd94c28a36dfdd5b93b8d5b0531f6b.png

Posted
16 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

 I don't have anything thin enough to poke through the hole jewel, any other options for prizing them apart? I've tried soaking in solvent and a run through the ultrasonic

How about the pivot of a scrap balance?    

Posted
13 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

How about the pivot of a scrap balance?

I just tried--turns out the only scrap balance I have lying around is from a large pocketwatch, and the pivot doesn't fit in the jewel hole 😕

Turns out the answer was "lots and lots of poking and prodding on a Rodico blob."

Looks more like shellac than oil. I did see a Youtube video the other day where someone used CA glue to hold a cap jewel in place, so very little would surprise me.

But that sure explains why the balance didn't move!

2080421275_RawPhoto.thumb.jpg.1f805a35c9c81d44156787c021f94c76.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Excellent info, thank you! So when you say "conforms to the standard" does that mean, for example, that parts are interchangeable between brands and ages, or that you could use accessories built for that 110-year old one on a newer one that was built in the 1990s? Also, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and your patience.
    • It was first a brand, but became a standardized style. So you will find some older lathes actually marked "Webster Whitcomb" and many other makers who built WW lathes conforming to the same dimensions for spindle height, bed shape, attachment setup, collet size and design. https://www.lathes.co.uk/derbyshire/ So when someone mentions a WW lathe today, they are talking about any lathe that conforms to the standard, which could be a 110 year old American made lathe or a European made lathe from the 1960s or something else.
    • Hi guys, just a little thank you for the CLOCKBARN site in America.  I purchased a TIMETRAX APMLIFIER to help with setting clocks in beat from CLOCKBARN it arrived on time and when tested worked ok.  A week later I had occasion to need it again, this time nothing the unit was dead. Checked out batteries , probes etc , nothing.    I messaged CLOCKBARN  to this effect.  I got a prompt reply that he would send a replacement which duly arrived today and having tested it it’s ok.  So I can recommend the site should you need to use it. The person,persons who run it are genuine guys.  So thank you CLOCKBARN  for your excellent service.
    • Hi there! You have learned how professional watchmakers feel about Timex. It is very difficult to find one willing to work on them, for a few reasons: 1) a lot of them wrongly believe Timex cannot be serviced, are riveted together. This is a myth. 2) when serviced, they still cannot meet the performance standards of jeweled mechanical watches (-20sec/day is good enough for a Timex) 3) customers are unwilling to pay the watchmaker's hourly bench rates because the watches are worth very little The service manual for the M33 is available at https://heritage1854.com/m33 but you also need the M32 and M31 manuals because they build on each other (31 is the base, 32 has date, 33 has day and date) https://heritage1854.com/m31 https://heritage1854.com/m32 A stuck date changeover can be due to a missing, bent or broken detent spring (part 2576 in the manual) or the date wheel (2556) got stuck or separated from its post, or maybe disengaged from the hour wheel. With a little confidence, these are not difficult to repair and parts are pretty much interchangeable with any other Timex from the same era having the same features. So it is very easy to find inexpensive spares in the form of junk watches (don't bother trying to search for individual spare parts). My recommendation would be to find a junk Timex with an M25 (older manual wind with date) and practice a little with it. Follow the service manual from the same website. The automatics are a bit more difficult to work on but once you get a feel for how they fit together, you can make an attempt at your automatic and you would be able to use many spare parts from the M25 if necessary. To work with most Timex movements, you do not need a lot of tools. Just one screwdriver, 1.4mm is a good size, tweezers, and hand levers to remove the hands plus hand pusher tools to replace them. Of course if you want to do a full cleaning and restoration more is needed. But to get it apart and diagnose, only minimal tools.
    • I do indeed have some programming and electronics know-how. 3 decades writing code for a living, and playing with microcontrollers as a hobby. 🙂 It helps with my actual living of being a voice actor because I can maintain my own equipment- no one around to replace the caps or the tube in an obscure botique mic that isn't made or supported any longer. Also saves money maintaining and cleaning my own interfaces and mixers when they develop problems in the faders and such. That said... I do have a question that, I'm sure, will betray my ignorance about certain areas that I have yet to fill in. I understand a "WW" lathe is a "Webster Whitcomb", but from what I understand that is a style of lathe and not a brand, correct? If someone would be willing to clarify and maybe expand on the terminology, it would be helpful so I can better understand the advice being given and know what I need to look into to further my knowledge. For example, a Sherline mill would appear to be either a separate piece of gear or an attachment/expansion to their smaller lathe. When you say you have a WW lathe and a sherline mill, can you say exactly what devices you have? Thank you! (I just realized I have a few Raspberry Pis and some Arduinos of various form factors around here I could probably put to good use in a scenario like you describe above).  
×
×
  • Create New...