Jump to content

Fhf 186 repair


Recommended Posts

I bought another non runner, it had I was told a broken staff, so I thought I'd have a go, as I do. 

There are quite a few variations, so I've since found out, but then for a watch that was made from the 40s or there abouts there bound to be. 

My original broken watch has/had an overcoil hairspring, that was pretty bad, the staff was broken and the lower jewel and to make matters worse so was the escape wheel jewel hole and the bolt spring is broken. 

As luck would have it I've a donor, well bits of a donor, it consists of a tube with a disassembled balance wheel with a broken staff, and the movement in pieces. 

I haven't done a staff for years, so I actually enjoyed it, the balance wheel didn't exactly fit as I had to open the balance wheel to fit the new staff, but what a wonderful tight fit. 

Anyway as in the last picture you'll notice it's going like a train, not bad for a 80 year old piece. 

IMG_20210528_200715.jpg

IMG_20210528_200942.jpg

IMG_20210528_200819.jpg

IMG_20210528_200854.jpg

IMG_20210528_201020.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2021 at 11:57 PM, antonyh said:

  the balance wheel didn't exactly fit as I had to open the balance wheel to fit the new staff, 

Hi @antonyh,

How did you elaborate to open the balance wheel to get a tight fit, did you drill on a lathe?    would broaching free hand work? 

TIA

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I simply opened up the wheel with a brooch a little at a time, got it so that I had to push it onto the staff, then tapped it into place. 

I really haven't done a lot of this sort of work for a while, sitting there with my Rhonda staff book out on the kitchen table, trying to get all the measurements correct. 

When I was looking through all the staffs that I have, I look on some of the smaller staffs from some of the smaller watches and think that a few years ago it was the norm to replace a staff, where as now days you would throw the movement away and just buy a new one. 

Ronda-Staff-Catalogue-Front-211x300.jpg

Edited by antonyh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. 
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
×
×
  • Create New...