Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Dear All;

I encountered a problem which I haven't been able to solve yet. The movement is a Poljot 3133, 21,600BPH, lift angle 50 degrees. The movement has been serviced and runs reasonable healthy (very slight wave from the train) in both horizontal positions, DU & DD.

However, in all the vertical positions the beat-error stays good, the amplitude drops and daily rate literally "takes-off".

What have I done so far;

- Checked and adjusted the hairspring; took the hair-spring off the balance wheel, made sure that the arc of the hairspring matched the arc of the regulate pin & boot and that the collet is central above the jewel. It runs & oscillate precisely between the narrowly adjusted pin&boot. All coils are nicely concentric and the hairspring runs nicely centric.

- Changed out both anti-shocks, Chaton & cap-stone, no improvement.

- Changed out balance assembly for an assembly of a good running 3133 and the movement runs fine . Inserted the "troubled" balance assembly in a healthy running movement and again, it runs fine in horizontal positions, but takes off in all vertical positions.

- Changed out the entire balance cock + anti-shock; no improvement.

- Impulse jewel appears to be mounted solid.

- Balance end-shake seems very fine and pegged both balance-staff pivots multiple times.

- The pallet-fork end-shake seems fine and the "healthy balance" runs good with it.

Since the "healthy balance" runs fine in the movement, and the "troubled balance-assembly" runs also poor in the "healthy movement" I suspect that the problem lays in the balance assembly but I just can figure out the why 🤔

Has anybody any idea's what the problem is and suggestions where I could look next?

 

Dial-UP;

IMG_1283.thumb.JPG.38d6390aa19103ce7cd37832e5fa11f3.JPG

Dial-Down;

IMG_1284.thumb.JPG.b8dcae9ef367e3d6c5bc06e100f16b69.JPG

Crown-down;

IMG_1285.thumb.JPG.d5e0d5a080ba8ea9f67c4234d1a1ad3f.JPG

Crown-Left;

IMG_1286.thumb.JPG.49bf2af9e520dcb020fe8d8b7443de72.JPG

CR & CU are yielding the same pictures.

Hope to hear ........ 😉

 

Edited by Endeavor
Posted (edited)

At the moment I can't see anything wrong with the center wheel, but perhaps the problem lays in the train?

Could you please explain how you suggestion works and why it would not show up in the horizontal, but only in the vertical positions?

In the meantime I inserted another good running balance (not finely adjusted for the movement under investigation) and I does show the same behavior, but slightly less severe. Here again about 100 degrees are lost.

DD;

IMG_1290.thumb.JPG.544f26bccddd6fe3b26c56e6474b70c6.JPG

CD;

IMG_1289.thumb.JPG.6794ffc358eed99b219d01fd220dbc3c.JPG

CR;

IMG_1292.thumb.JPG.d5a7213eaa22ce1113835a24203ffa38.JPG

I will strip the movement and check. If the problem sits in the train, there are options left like changing the center-wheel (great-wheel or the first off the main-spring barrel), changing the whole main-plate, barrel-bridge etc.

What I don't understand is that when the trouble balance is placed in a good running 3133, it also runs poor?

Edited by Endeavor
Posted

The first step I would take would be to scrupulously clean the hair spring and demagnetize.

I would suggest that there is a slight stickiness to the H/S which is enough such that as the H/S sags in the vertical it brings coils close enough together to stick, causing the increase in rate, but in the horizontal positions the stickiness isn't strong enough to overcome the natural shape of the H/S without the help of gravitational sag, so no sticking together and the rate behaves.

It may be that if you were to inspect the H/S in the vetical positions you can see if this is an issue, but as you didn't mention cleaning the H/S or demagnetizing as steps you have already taked then this would certainly be where I would start.

Posted (edited)

Thanks Marc; even though not mentioned, but the hair-spring has been thoroughly cleaned. However not demagnetized. In vertical, while running, all coils appear to run free, but I will give your suggestion a try and report back.

Edited by Endeavor
Posted

Disassembled the balance wheel+hair-spring. It didn't show any magnetism on the Lepsi App, but nonetheless demagnetized the set. While disassembled, I took a picture of the hair-spring.

IMG_1294.thumb.JPG.cb6bc3eade452b6bce364215d7fe1037.JPG

Assembled and installed, but sadly the same problem, be it with an improved amplitude;

DD;IMG_1295.thumb.JPG.2d98ec7eb1bccb6647ab3309c2b61cbd.JPG

 

CD and CL, same with CU & CR;

 

IMG_1296.thumb.JPG.8c92535bcb7412775fcd376d850c0030.JPG

IMG_1297.thumb.JPG.ab8fc42f04f692a97235524793aca48a.JPG

 

Hmmm ...... 🤔

Posted

The amplitudes are OK now. Check that the hairspring is bouncing evenly between the regulator pins. Sometimes is can be touching one pin all the time except at higher amplitude, where it pulls away; this will give a slower rate in high amplitude positions (horizontal), and speed it up at lower amplitudes. If all 4 vertical positions are running at +100 or so that is a likely culprit.

Posted (edited)

Yes, I spend quite some time making sure that the hair-spring curvature was "perfect" and that it bounces in horizontal positions equally between the boot & pin. The gap between boot & pin has also been reduced till a practical minimum. The 3133 has a normal pin & boot, not like the adjustable stud as with an ETA7750.

In vertical position with the balance facing up (CR) the hairspring seems to lean more towards the boot and with an amplitude 258. Balance down (CL) it is bouncing equally between pin & boot (244). CU it's leaning towards the boot(257), CD towards the pin (253)

In all vertical positions the daily rate is as shown in the pictures above.

Edited by Endeavor
Posted (edited)

To give some slightly more back-ground about this movement; I acquired it a number of years back and most likely, with another balance, I experienced a problem. Couldn't solve it and stored it in my Poljot 3133 spare-parts box as an "complete" movement but without the balance wheel.

The current balance + hairspring are new as supplied on eBay but again, as I suppose it was back then, I now experience some odd behavior.

This time I'm more determined to solve the problem as I need the movement for a new Junker 3133 dial + case.

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
Posted
7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

The amplitudes are OK now.

can't quite put a finger on it but I don't like the timing machine results at all I don't think they're right? How easy it is it to adjust the beat on this watch? In other words can you just move the beat adjustment arm? The reason is any time a Chinese machine I see zeros I get suspicious that maybe it's not correct. So if you deliberately take the watch out of beat and put it back in the positions where it has zeros does it show that the beat is whatever you set it to?

The other thing happens is visually look at the balance when it's in the lower amplitudes how bad does it look? There are the examples of the timing machine thinking super low amplitudes are higher than they really are and that changes things. So I just don't like what I see in the timing machine but I can't quite put a finger on it. Which unfortunately if I'm right changes everything you're seeing.

So how would a normal functioning watch of this type look like on the timing machine?

6 hours ago, Endeavor said:

The current balance + hairspring are new as supplied on eBay but again, as I suppose it was back then, I now experience some odd behavior.

as the balance wheels been changed and that shouldn't be the issue what about the balance jewels themselves? Especially the whole jewels if one of those has a bad spot L show up in the crown positions and probably won't show up either dial up or dial down. Otherwise I would've suggested it could be the balance pivots but since it's a different balance wheel as long as the hole size is right for the size of the pivots that shouldn't be an issue.

Posted

Hi John;

thanks for jumping in too 😃

With regards to the timing machine I've been thinking the same; rubbish in = rubbish out. Last night I was thinking to put some hands on it to see if it indeed runs that fast in the vertical positions. With those indicated daily-rates I should be able to see that in a short period of time.

I've been changing out the both Chatons & capstones and the balance-bridge; no difference. Last thing, even if it was just for the sake of it, is changing out the main-plate for a new (which I have in my spare-parts box).

Today, time permitting, I'll check the beat-error regulating point you brought up and also (again) swap the balance assembly to some good running 3133's and insert good running balances in this movement, trying to figure out whether I'm dealing with just the balance assembly or perhaps with more simultaneous problems.

Please give me some time to do all these investigations and I'll report back ......

Posted (edited)

Started this morning with throwing the beat-error way off and slowly returned to the same starting point, concluding that adjusting the beat-error is a consistent/repeatable point of the lever.

Leaving deliberately a beat-error to check the timegrapher performance, here are the DD, DU, CD, CL, CU & CR. The worst performer seems to be CU, but it is "remarkable" that all vertical daily-rates are about in a range between +73s/d and +83s/d.

Next plan of action is to change out only the main-plate, transferring everything ever as currently is.

Here are the timegrapher readings;

DD;

IMG_1298.thumb.JPG.750168ff69a0f7ecd6fe6d7452bba603.JPG

 

DU (as mentioned before, there is a small wave from the power-train)

IMG_1299.thumb.JPG.a3a3f275fb2a0325d2ff2569a9894d15.JPG

CD;

IMG_1301.thumb.JPG.2143a5f3cce85870aad2b6fda4dbee40.JPG

CL;

IMG_1302.thumb.JPG.f5cd002b83c38ddb779f892a29ed964a.JPG

CUIMG_1303.thumb.JPG.f6ba96738f8010dd68ed7e25f6bed658.JPG

CR;

IMG_1304.thumb.JPG.8abb29d7dd447409d6e095d48e77389f.JPG

Edited by Endeavor
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
×
×
  • Create New...