Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am struggling to replace the balance complete (or hairspring) on a very rare and inaccessible movement, a Tudor caliber 2461. The movement, balance, and balance staff are all in excellent condition. The hairspring is not - it's broken. 

My first instinct was to order a replacement balance complete. Unfortunately it's not an easy one to come by. 

My second idea was to buy donor movements with compatible specs (Hamilton 678, 679, 692, etc) - KIF shock system, 18000 beat rate, and one fixed regulation arm. Still waiting on delivery of some I purchased. 

My third idea is to simply try to buy a hairspring to spec. Is there a way to buy complete hairsprings (wound, with collet, and stud)? 

Thanks! 

Posted

 Dr ranfft lists a host of calibers of the same generation/family to 2461, those balance completes that beat the same would fit your watch( your best bet) and springs off of them would have the same springness ( CGS) therefore compatable with the balance you have. 

 Dedicated hairsprings as you speak of with stud and collet attached which all you got to do is to install existed for many calibers and might be found specially on ebay. 

Another point is Tudor expectedly used specifically high grade hairsprings. 

Regs

Joe

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

 Dr ranfft lists a host of calibers of the same generation/family to 2461, those balance completes that beat the same would fit your watch( your best bet) and springs off of them would have the same springness ( CGS) therefore compatable with the balance you have. 

 Dedicated hairsprings as you speak of with stud and collet attached which all you got to do is to install existed for many calibers and might be found specially on ebay. 

Another point is Tudor expectedly used specifically high grade hairsprings. 

Regs

Joe

 

Thanks! 
I flip between the Jules Borel caliber reference and Ranfft to figure out what parts and movements are compatible. 
The harder part is finding similarly high grade donor watches without high price tags. 
A couple follow up questions: 

Is there an easy or consistent way to determine the collet size by movement type/caliber, manufacturer, or some detail like shock system? I need a .6mm collet size. 
I’ve been eyeing up Hamilton’s as potential good donors. Can you think of others you’d recommend targeting? 
Also to your point about beat rates, if I found a different family of calibers that beat at the same rate, could I harvest springs from them? For example, ETA 1080’s? 

Edited by mzinski
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mzinski said:

Also to your point about beat rates, if I found a different family of calibers that beat at the same rate, could I harvest springs from them? For example, ETA 1080’s?

I wouldn’t choose a balance complete from an ETA 1080 since it has a different base caliber.
My curiosity of why I have so many balances completes for ETA 2390 at home got answered with this question too, it seems to fit a TUDOR Cal. 2461 too.
A quick search in the BestFit database confirms my suspicions.
So if you want to try a balance complete out for this one I would try the 2390 one or some in that family. (Note the difference in the roller table)

 

ROL TUDOR 2461.png

Edited by HSL
Posted

Replacing hairsprings is really difficult due to finding the correct spring. I have a draw full of hairsprings purchased over the years but rarely find one that is suitable. 

Posted

There you are, as advised above , same beat doesn't neccessarily mean neither  interchangability, compatibility nor incompatibility, 1080 hairspring might not/ might have same CGS as 2390, if you are lucky its CGS might be close enough to vibrate with 2390 balance. Even between members of same family its the same CGS which means compatible but not neccessarily interchangable right away.

2 hours ago, mzinski said:

 

Is there an easy or consistent way to determine the collet size by movement type/caliber, manufacturer, or some detail like shock system? I need a .6mm collet size. 
 

Go by staff, see what staff its suppose to fit on or has come off of. 

Any hairspring will eventually vibrate with a balance so compatibility is limited by the space available on the balance wheel. There are also factors such as stability of the beat, impulse energy .... but that is a designers concern I think.

I summary any of calibers Dr ranfft says no difference is known between them and 2461, would fit right into your watch.

I doubt if hamilton's hairspring grade meets Tudors standards, but what do I know. ?

 Good luck pal.

 

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, clockboy said:

Replacing hairsprings is really difficult due to finding the correct spring. I have a draw full of hairsprings purchased over the years but rarely find one that is suitable.

10 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

There you are, as advised above , same beat doesn't neccessarily mean neither  interchangability, compatibility nor incompatibility,

the problem is manufacturing tolerances of balance wheels. Traditionally every single hairspring is vibrated to a specific balance wheel. Exceptions to the rule are hairsprings that are manufactured first to very exacting specifications. Typically these are over coil hairsprings, the over coil has to be formed exacting locations. Then the balance wheel is matched by adjusting the timing screws.

Simplistic traditionally is two identical watches swap they hairspring is and it won't keep time because are not manufactured to close enough tolerances for that to occur. At least until relatively modern times perhaps.

References are interesting? Like the first link for different balance wheels when I figured out which one everyone thinks it is time to go with that whether it's right or not. Then look at the balance staffs think the balance wheels are confusing look at all the different staffs good we don't have to worry about that but that does appear to be a lot of variations.

But seeing as how the group seems to think that? Okay group likes 2390 but it looks like the base model at the link below is 2451?

so for the first link click on the right balance complete correspondence and 2390 scroll down to the bottom of the list almost andlooks like the available at the third link a bargain price. I suppose you could find one of the other balance completes and yes they would be cheaper but. Why go with cheaper when there it is.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=TUD_2461

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=[^[DYE\

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/rolex-tudor-2402-balance-complete-2402.721.html

 

 

 

Rolex tutor balance completes lots of them.JPG

Posted
37 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

the problem is manufacturing tolerances of balance wheels. Traditionally every single hairspring is vibrated to a specific balance wheel. Exceptions to the rule are hairsprings that are manufactured first to very exacting specifications. Typically these are over coil hairsprings, the over coil has to be formed exacting locations. Then the balance wheel is matched by adjusting the timing screws.

Simplistic traditionally is two identical watches swap they hairspring is and it won't keep time because are not manufactured to close enough tolerances for that to occur. At least until relatively modern times perhaps.

References are interesting? Like the first link for different balance wheels when I figured out which one everyone thinks it is time to go with that whether it's right or not. Then look at the balance staffs think the balance wheels are confusing look at all the different staffs good we don't have to worry about that but that does appear to be a lot of variations.

But seeing as how the group seems to think that? Okay group likes 2390 but it looks like the base model at the link below is 2451?

so for the first link click on the right balance complete correspondence and 2390 scroll down to the bottom of the list almost andlooks like the available at the third link a bargain price. I suppose you could find one of the other balance completes and yes they would be cheaper but. Why go with cheaper when there it is.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=TUD_2461

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=[^[DYE\

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/rolex-tudor-2402-balance-complete-2402.721.html

 

 

 

Rolex tutor balance completes lots of them.JPG

Thanks John! I was going down the route of the 2402, arriving at donor watches and thinking about eta 1080’s. But the link to a complete balance for $250 is a very good price - it’s been ordered. 

Posted

I can happily report I received the balance complete from Cas-Ker today - all ready installed and running better than ever. Glad I got turned on to their availability rather than seek out a compatible hairspring or balance complete from a donor movement. 

IMG_7813.thumb.jpg.08c6742fb7b224571305732a2a8be43a.jpg

(for anyone paying attention, the dial was refinished by Bill & Sons in the UK)

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...