Jump to content

How can you accurately measure mainspring dimensions when the margin of error in the measurement is too significant?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry for the confusing title, allow me to explain.

If you're measuring something that is 50 cm across, it doesn't matter if your measurement is +/- 0.5 mm.

But I'm trying to measure the thickness/height of a mainspring to order a replacement.  I use my digital calipers, which measures out to the hundredth of a millimeter.  If I put the mainspring between the jaws and use a moderate amount of force to clamp it together, I get a reading.  But if I open the jaws and close back down on it, the reading might be different.  If my force in closing the jaws is too little, the reading will still be different.  Basically there's no repeatability.

And like I said, if the object is large, then this isn't an issue.  But if I'm trying to measure a 0.1mm thick mainspring, and my variation is +/- 0.05mm, that is an enormous variation.  My goto for mainspring information is Ranfft, but that website doesn't always have the movement I'm looking for.

What are your methods for accurately measuring the mainspring dimensions?

Posted
13 minutes ago, GregG said:

If I put the mainspring between the jaws and use a moderate amount of force to clamp it together, I get a reading.  But if I open the jaws and close back down on it, the reading might be different.  If my force in closing the jaws is too little, the reading will still be different.  Basically there's no repeatability.

There is no force control device like on a micrometer (which is a must have for serious watchmaking) but with a bit of practice one can easily repeat with 2 hundredths or so.

 

13 minutes ago, GregG said:

But if I'm trying to measure a 0.1mm thick mainspring, and my variation is +/- 0.05mm, that is an enormous variation.

Yes sometime there is some doubt but cross referencing the document below or using Cousins UK search one can see what the closes available size is, and it will work fine.

13 minutes ago, GregG said:

 My goto for mainspring information is Ranfft, but that website doesn't always have the movement I'm looking for.

Download the GR catalog from Cousins UK, most likely it will list code and size for the mov.t you have.

  • Like 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, GregG said:

But I'm trying to measure the thickness/height of a mainspring to order a replacement.  I use my digital calipers, which measures out to the hundredth of a millimeter.

I can see somebody beat me to the answer?

 

5 minutes ago, jdm said:

There is no force control device like on a micrometer

 

at work we have digital calipers and you're right measuring the thickness of a mainspring not quite a waste of time but not very accurate either. If you really want the best use a micrometer. I have a link below the talks about the differences it doesn't mention the problem were having. Caliper ideally would like to measure something that's flat without a curvature. If you doing a mainspring it's very easy to angle  yet in the jaws and that will give you a variation. Squeezing the jaws together of course gives you a variation. A micrometer can close down and clamp on the mainspring and it's an absolute. If you want the best measurements get a micrometer.

But so you're off my little bit who cares? Mainsprings typically do not, in an infinite number of thicknesses it depends on the watch. Then if you get in the pocket watch size or vintage you get other complications like the original blued steel versus the modern steel is there a difference in strength of the same thickness. For American pocket watches once had a whole bunch of sizes and now you're lucky to get just one thickness because are not going manufacture five different thicknesses they're only going give you one if you're lucky. So their caliper will get you close the micrometer would be better.

 

https://www.fullyinstrumented.com/micrometer-vs-caliper/

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, jdm said:

There is no force control device like on a micrometer (which is a must have for serious watchmaking) but with a bit of practice one can easily repeat with 2 hundredths or so.

 

Yes sometime there is some doubt but cross referencing the document below or using Cousins UK search one can see what the closes available size is, and it will work fine.

Download the GR catalog from Cousins UK, most likely it will list code and size for the mov.t you have.

Thank you everyone for the wonderful answers.  It may be because I'm on mobile, but you said "the document below", but I don't see anything. I've also checked ranfft and the cousins gr catalogs and cannot find information on the bulova 3AK mainspring. The gr has other "3xx" movements but not the 3AK.

Posted

If you don't own a micrometer and your calibre is mentioned nowhere, there is still a variant to find the right strength:
Measure the inner diameter of the barrel D and calculate strength and length.
Strength is 1/80 to 1/90 of D. For fully jewelled movements rather 1/90.

You cannot be sure that the old spring was of correct dimensions.

Frank

Posted
3 hours ago, GregG said:

 "the document below", but I don't see anything. 

That is, the GR catalog "mentioned below".

16 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Caliper ideally would like to measure something that's flat without a curvature.

And ever more do micrometers with rounds tips, so either get the specially shape tip version which cost a lot  more, or clamp down defeating the torque knob,which kinds of goes against repeatability.
So one use the tapered end of the caliper jaws, for that and many other occasions.

Posted
3 hours ago, jdm said:

And ever more do micrometers with rounds tips, so either get the specially shape tip version which cost a lot  more, or clamp down defeating the torque knob,which kinds of goes against repeatability.
So one use the tapered end of the caliper jaws, for that and many other occasions.

I didn't mean to torque the micrometer down with a pair of vise grips that's not what I was saying. You can gently close them what I'm saying is we are holding a mainspring in your hand it's really hard if not impossible to hold it parallel to the jaw's of the caliper. So I find you can the get varying numbers just because it's a wiggling around it's not like a large flat piece of something worth a lot easier to hold. In size you usually find a flat spot on the mainspring.

Then yesterday when is playing with my beer calipers of course the other problem is just squeeze them touch them a look at them wrong or open and close them and every single time you'll be off by a tiny bit they just aren't super super accurate even if they haven't nifty digital display with lots of numbers. Of course maybe if you had a precision one unlike the cheap things we haven't worked.

6 hours ago, GregG said:

I've also checked ranfft and the cousins gr catalogs and cannot find information on the bulova 3AK mainspring

one of the things helpful for finding parts is movement number you gave us the movement number would've been helpful to give it sooner and a picture would've been really nice because we have a mystery here kind of

so we get the first link will a parts list normally would get enough information or availability apart we could get to the mainspring but parts list sucks but it does give us this MOVEMENT BASE MODEL FF 59-21 ULTRA FLEX (N8) ELASTOR (N1-7). Just to confirm it would be nice to have a picture the movement so I googled it for you and confirmed what I suspect. There appear to be no listings really of this yes there's listing at the link below there is the mainspring doesn't appear to list. If I look at bestfit online they don't even have this movement it doesn't seem to exist but what about the base caliber maybe it exists.

Really weird looking in the mainspring catalog it doesn't seem to exist either an unknown watch except googling gives us pictures which I must wipe off eBay in the absence of yours. also I have a clue as to what the problem is Bulova puts date codes on stuff at least past the 50s so n4 which is on the movement I'm currently looking at would be 74 I believe that is why it's not in any of the references it's relatively modern. This is a problem of having mainspring catalog that was printed probably before this bestfit book definitely printed before this there would be a lot of literature.

so if my research is right here watch should be at the third link. They might've even left the OEM number under the balance wheel which will confirm this also but you can look at the picture that hopefully remember to attach.

So if my research is right the fourth link tells you the mainspring is very common and lots of people have it probably because it looks like it fits a lot of watches. Even if you can't measure the thickness because that's pretty darn thin the width and the length should correspond to the mainspring found at that link if they do then I would assume the thickness is correct and find one of those are probably on eBay.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=BUL_3AK

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=Y_kDiiotWYp

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=FF_59-21

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=qWIXHk

 

 

Bulova 3ak mystery movement or not.JPG

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
×
×
  • Create New...