Jump to content

6139-6015 Issue/Maybe not?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys back again.

Thanks for all the help you all provided when I was troubleshooting the bulova, it is running amazing now.

I have a 6139 Chrono that looks great on the timegrapher.  It is running at +8 s/d and 0.1ms beat error, it keeps awesome time when I am wearing it, but for some reason when I leave it in my watch box overnight it seems to lose a couple of minutes.  The hands dont seem super loose or anything so the only thing I can think is the calendar works slows it down when its switch day/date?

Any thoughts or help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advance the hands by 12hrs, compare time on the watch with time on your smart phone or a reliable time piece, between 10am to 2pm, you should notice if it slows down in this 4hrs time period. 

How long is it actual power reserve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wdschell said:

for some reason when I leave it in my watch box overnight it seems to lose a couple of minutes. 

Try different resting positions, finding them either with the help of a timegrapher, or just with patience over days. 

This ancient method of averaging errors is nowadays almost forgotten by many watch owners expecting quartz like accuracy from their mechanical pieces, no matter their make, vintage or conditions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Wdschell said:

I would guess around 30ish hours.  I haven't actually checked it, but it seems to run 24ish hours after I am done wearing it before it stops completely.

Also did you mean 10pm to 2am when it starts to change the date/day?

The power reserve is acceptable.

I meant advancing hands by 12 hrs , then it changes date at noon ,so you have a chance to observe time on it and compare with a reliabke time keeper.   Otherwise as jgm says , its likely to depend on its resting position. Face up or down etc.

Regs 

joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Wdschell said:

I'll run that test tomorrow.  If it is running slow during that time period would that indicate a problem of some sort?

It would show the jumper mech is heavy footed, .if it slows down only when trying to jump the day/ date, we can conclude jumping is what slows the rate.

When servicing the movement, one would have a chance to make such observation without and with the date mech engaged.

A clean and new lube on date complication might improve things.

Regs 

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Melt said:

I would check the plastic day date wheel for bent teeth or a bent finger.

 

Ya, plastic jumpers, actually any faulty parts in day/ date complication, bent day disk for instance or simply dried out grease in disk groove. Spotting the fault now can get to be a pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I serviced my 6139B the date finger (868611) and Intermediate date wheel (81760) were both made of plastic and had some damage.  I replaced both of them with new (from schillachi61 on ebay, a great source for seiko parts).  The new intermediate date wheel was now metal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I will take this chance to practice my fault finding.

Thanks canthus I will check those pieces out when I have it apart.  Thanks for the seller to I wasn't sure whether to order parts or to order a whole parts movement if some sort

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...