Jump to content

Removing mineral glass without crystal press?


SudoHalt

Recommended Posts

Hey there, 

I would like to work on just another disassembly, albeit patiently, but I seem to have the wrong cheap watch to start with. 

From the pictures, it could be seen that the case is milled to exactly the movement diameter. In other words, the movement holder is actually an integral part of the case.

This means I can't remove the movement and the dial as a single piece. Instead, I'll have to remove the mineral crystal first, which will likely make the movement and dial removable in one piece. And even if it is not the case, removing the hands safely is certainly better than attempting to remove the movement from the case back side anyway. 

The crystal is definitely mineral, even with an anti scratch coating. The edges are beveled and there's absolutely no way to grip it with the acrylic crystal remover. 

If it helps, the crystal is big, at least 37mm in diameter. 

What are my options? I have my nuclear option but I don't want to act stupid.

Bonus question : what's the movement? It sort of resembles the ST-16, except that it isn't (but I can be wrong) 

IMG_20210204_122521.jpg

IMG_20210204_122507.jpg

IMG_20210204_122351.jpg

Edited by SudoHalt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If indeed the mvtholder is part of the case(of which I am not sure according to the photos) you can gently put a bench knife between the bezel and the case and take the bezel of, normally the crystal should be held in place by the bezel.

The crystal is a normal crystal, not a very big size.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Watchtime said:

If indeed the mvtholder is part of the case(of which I am not sure according to the photos) you can gently put a bench knife between the bezel and the case and take the bezel of, normally the crystal should be held in place by the bezel.

The crystal is a normal crystal, not a very big size.

 

Thanks a lot. Probably the crystal isn't large, but it's the largest watch I ever laid my hands on!

May I ask, since I have never attempted this, how much force should be required? I have previously removed the rotating bezels on Seikos and Vostoks. Should I expect this one to be as easy, or is there considerably more force required?

On the other hand, I am preparing for the scenario where the bezel is too tight. Apart from breaking the crystal, I got another stupid idea... Since I am able to feel the crystal gasket by my nails, do you think it's a reasonable idea to attempt to rupture the crystal gasket by the means of a razor, in order to free the crystal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As said by watchtime I also agree with his comments and would think that the bezel removes with the crystal intact. Some require a fair degree of force to remove and may need a tool such as the tool attached.  Refrain from trying to work the crystal out as this may lead to damage of the bezel and the crystal seating and ruin the gasket.

s-l1600.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SudoHalt said:

 Since I am able to feel the crystal gasket by my nails, do you think it's a reasonable idea to attempt to rupture the crystal gasket by the means of a razor, in order to free the crystal?

No I don't think is a reasonable idea. A caseback press that can also do some crystal work is very cheap. In watchmaking as well other trades the idea is that one tries hard to repair, not break things. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the wtch/brand. What brand is it? Can you post a photo of the front of the watch. It is supposed to keep water out so it should not be very loose...?

Take a razor blade or a sharp bench knife to get it off, you can put a piece of gaffer tape on the bezel/cae and cut through it. You wan;t get scratches then....I am wondering where you feel the gasket? Not on the front I guess? To be sure, have a replacement gasket ready, When replacing crystals with gaskets, I change these too.

Edited by Watchtime
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure! Some very accomplished repairers never use epilame! I have often wondered if it is worth the trouble. Not using epilame will shorten the service intervals though, but that could be better perhaps both for the owner and the repairer!? Speaking of oiling, I just read this: After WWII in the 1950s the first Synthetic Oils came on the market. Most watchmakers did not rush to use these oils since they were bad for business now that the watch serviced with Synthetic oil would not come back to him for service for another 5-7 years he would lose a lot of income. ~Ofrei.com  
    • I read that same article last night  H.  I think epilame is too much headache for me, sources aren't always accurate, some conflicting. Such is the GRAVITY of this situation, Is it ok if i just STICK  to a thixotropic oil 🤣
    • Not sure I follow along. As I stated in one of my previous posts, the epilame will remain intact between rubbing parts as long as the surface is lubricated by oil or grease. Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
×
×
  • Create New...