Jump to content

New member Bob H.


Bobbo

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

I joined you all a few weeks ago. I'm have been a big fan of Horology since I was a child, I'm Now 61. 

I have a varied collection of watches From cheep Chinese Quartz & Autos to High end Swiss Auto Mechanical. I have recently taken to tinkering with the older Swiss mechanical (50s to 70s) movements that are advertised as Parts or Repairable. I enjoy getting these has been movements going again. I've had some success! eg FHF st96.  Recently Purchased a ladies watch with a AS 970 Swiss Movement.(not working).

Stripped it down cleaned it all in ultrasonic & started to rebuild.. almost completed .. Started to install the Balance wheel... But Problem? Its rocking in the Jewel set. I cannot see Why? I'm not sure if the pivots (Pins) on the Balance Wheel are worn there appears to be too much play & rocking. Having not seen this movement before.. I'm not sure what the BW pins should look like? The Jewels appear to be fine.

Has anybody got an idea? and is it possible to get a spare?

Best Regards All,

Bob H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

Two possibilities.

1- Balance is out of flat and wobbles

2- Balance pivot should stay inside the jewel hole, if it slides out, 

a- Pivot might be broken

b- Jewel might be broken

c- Pivot is worn too short or the cock is raised, thereby has increased the distance between upper and lower jewels, which lets the pivot slide out.

Diagnoses,  Gently raise one side of balance rim with an oiler or a piece of paper while you keep an eye on staff pivot(from side view) to see if it satys where the jewel hole is, or not.

You may take balance complete out and inspect its pivots under good magnifiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi       http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&AS_970    this link will take you to The site Ranfft with pictures and specifications of you watch, un able as yet to locate a tech sheet as regards parts  try cousins uk, or Jules Borel and Esslingers , timesavers in the States. Meanwhile I will have a look round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. “Wiggle room“ doesn‘t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.  I searched GR mainspring for the AS 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 with 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477   As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to be 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power.   Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101      
    • Your setup is correct. The smallest diameter of one pulley must correspond with the largest of the other one, else not speed variation. Frank
    • Haven't seen them before. 
×
×
  • Create New...