Jump to content

Timex Electronic from the junk pile


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Bear in mind that the output would be 110 or 240 V AC, and might give you a bit of a whack if you are not careful.

No problem. I have experience working with 1000V vacuum tubes and 60kV transformers. Lost count of number of times I gotten shocks. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A typical electric clock consists of an asynchronous AC motor and a gearbox to drive the hands.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_clock#Synchronous_electric_clock

Asynchronous motors are not particularly fussy about the input voltage, however they run at a more or less fixed rate, due to the way they are constructed. If you look at one of those old fashioned timer plugs, the electromechanical ones, they work the same way. So the output voltage needed to drive the motor might not need to be too precise, so if it is a little low, that may not affect the rate of the clock. A little high, might cause the coils to overheat, but a little low within reason might not have any measurable effect. Obviously if the voltage drops way too low, then there would not be enough energy to drive the motor.

The accuracy of the clock depends almost entirely on the accuracy of the main frequency, rather than its voltage.

What this means in practice is that you could probably pull an ancient 12V transformer based wall wart apart and use the transformer from it. Modern wall warts are smaller and don't use the same type of transformer, they use a switching regulator (switched mode) design.  The secondary would be fed by your switching transistor, with a current limiting resistor, and that in turn by your 555 sine wave generator. The secondary of the original transformer becomes the primary in your circuit and vice versa. Bear in mind as I said before you would produce sufficient current at approximately mains potential to give yourself a bit of a whack if you were not careful, so treat the output the same way you would a live mains circuit.

The output would be approximately correct, and probably close enough to be functional.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are other ways to produce a nice clean sine wave of course.  DDS function generators pcb are cheap as chips on ebay.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=dds+signal+generator&_sacat=0&LH_TitleDesc=0&_sop=15

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ICL8038-DDS-Signal-Generator-Module-IC-DIY-DC-12V-25V-Sine-Square-Triangle-Wave/273264014504?hash=item3f9fcdf4a8:g:yWwAAOSwQb1bF5Vm

That way you can run your clock at any speed you like... If you want to extend your lunch hour... slow it down. Time dragging in that meeting.. speed it up... ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armed with total control of the frequency of your "mains", you could go for the Lord Vetinari approach to time keeping.

Quote

Lord Vetinari also has a strange clock in his waiting-room. While it does keep completely accurate time overall, it sometimes ticks and tocks out of sync (example: "tick, tock ... ticktocktick, tock ...") and occasionally misses a tick or tock altogether, which has the net effect of turning one's brain "into a sort of porridge". (Feet of Clay, Going Postal). In Feet of Clay Vimes observes that it must have cost him quite a lot of money.

https://www.instructables.com/Lord-Vetinari-Clock/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch stopped again this morning after working fine for 2 days. I noticed the the second hand spins when I tried to adjust the time. This means that the sweep wheel click is not locking properly.

Looks like I have to do a full tear down and check the click spring.

I hate reassembling Timex Electrics and its variants. There are just so many pivots to persuade into the pivot holes. I wonder how they did it in the factory. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have a 40 movement and the wire is fine, but no joy on the coil. Contact pin to coil back to balance wheel is somehow gone. 

I don't have anything to magnify so I can see the wires of the coil in enough detail. Anyone fix a coil before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...