Jump to content

Quartz replacement?


IFELL

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am dealing with quartz Seiko 7N42 movement which I want to replace, but can't find any stock with the suppliers. Would you know about any suitable replacements for this one?
The dimensions are:

Size Ø25.60mm (11½’” Ligne)

Height 2.90mm

Hour, Minute & Centre Seconds

Date @ 3h

Battery 371

Hands Min .65, Hr 1.10, Sec .2

 

Thanks,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, IFELL said:

Hi all,

I am dealing with quartz Seiko 7N42 movement which I want to replace, but can't find any stock with the suppliers. Would you know about any suitable replacements for this one?

Thanks,

You can order the entire new movement for £10.45

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/seiko-movement-parts

They are out of stock till mid Dec, if you can wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vx42 is a direct replacement, sold by Seiko for assembly into non Seiko watches ,as such it is marked differently. it is generally cheaper ,more readily available and the only time you would know the difference is when you remove the case back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, yankeedog said:

The vx42 is a direct replacement, sold by Seiko for assembly into non Seiko watches ,as such it is marked differently. it is generally cheaper ,more readily available and the only time you would know the difference is when you remove the case back.

It doesn't look like a direct replacement, but close: Sec .18 Vs Sec .20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7N42   Ligne, 11 1/2.  Thickness 2.78.  Hands 65/110/20 Dial feet  1 x 7  cell 371.

VX43   Ligne 11 1/2     Thickness 2.92.  Hands 65/110/20 Dial feet  2 X 8.  cell 373.

So not directly compatible  so hang on in there for the correct movement. You would have issues with the dial feet and the height depending on the case depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

7N42   Ligne, 11 1/2.  Thickness 2.78.  Hands 65/110/20 Dial feet  1 x 7  cell 371.

VX43   Ligne 11 1/2     Thickness 2.92.  Hands 65/110/20 Dial feet  2 X 8.  cell 373.

So not directly compatible  so hang on in there for the correct movement. You would have issues with the dial feet and the height depending on the case depth.

VX42 was suggested, not VX43:

Height 2.62mm

Hour, Minute & Center Seconds

Date @ 3h

Battery 371

Hand Sizes: Min .65, Hr 1.10, Sec .18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, yankeedog said:

Please check my post  in watch of the day. Dated September  9.  I Put a vx43 in a 7n43 watch without  a problem.  

I am glad it worked for you and I have no doubt that vx43 would work just fine in many case.

I simply noticed two differences: 2.92mm Vs 2.62mm Height, and Sec .18 Vs Sec .20 hand dia. I will take a look at your Sept 9 post. Cheers!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the discussion, I will try ordering the VX42 as the price is ok for giving it a go.

And yes the reason for this original question was the fact that the exact replacement is out of stock with not much visibility on the restock date.

Thanks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Poljot said:

I am glad it worked for you and I have no doubt that vx43 would work just fine in many case.

I simply noticed two differences: 2.92mm Vs 2.62mm Height, and Sec .18 Vs Sec .20 hand dia. I will take a look at your Sept 9 post. Cheers!

Yes there may be differences in the height, the vx42 being a tad slimmer.It was my impression however that most, if not all recent Seiko Quartz movements had 1.10, .65 and .20 mm handsizes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, yankeedog said:

Yes there may be differences in the height, the vx42 being a tad slimmer.It was my impression however that most, if not all recent Seiko Quartz movements had 1.10, .65 and .20 mm handsizes.

Some Seiko movements that I serviced were just under 2mm in height in very slim watch cases. Thus, I would not get any similar movements if they were even slightly thicker. Those movements did not have Sec Hand, just an Hour & Minute.  1.10mm & 0.65mm sounds about right, but I don't remember.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the VX42 did not work as the date ring of the 7N42 does not fit in there. I need to swap the disks due to a different colouring. 

If you are not swapping the date disks, the movement swap would probably work.

So, I will be patiently waiting for Cousins to receive the movements...hopefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that same article last night  H.  I think epilame is too much headache for me, sources aren't always accurate, some conflicting. Such is the GRAVITY of this situation, Is it ok if i just STICK  to a thixotropic oil 🤣
    • Not sure I follow along. As I stated in one of my previous posts, the epilame will remain intact between rubbing parts as long as the surface is lubricated by oil or grease. Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
×
×
  • Create New...