Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello again, I have a 1950 Bulova 10BM movement that is running extremely fast. I do not know the watch's history. So far, I have demagnetized, cleaned, and lubricated, and it is still gaining time. The hairspring is clean, not bent, coils are not stuck together or magnetized. I was wondering, when a watch is gaining vast amounts of time and you've demagnetized and cleaned but you don't know the watch's history, what are the next steps you would take to determine the cause?

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 11/12/2020 at 3:44 PM, MyFavoriteObsession said:

I have a 1950 Bulova 10BM movement that is running extremely fast.

Expand  

I have no suggestion at this time, but it would be interesting to know what you define as "extremely fast"? If you have a timing machine it could possibly tell us a lot. Anyway, that would be my next step, just to make sure it isn't re-banking, completely out of beat, or the poising (amplitudes) being all over the place.

Posted

If all visible signs are OK, then you check the non-visible.

You have done demag, one cause could be wrong someone slapped a hairspring on balance which didn't belong or the balance wheel doesn't.

I suppose it gains in all positions. 

Posted

Have you checked to see if the hairspring is correctly between the regulator, it should be free to move no matter what position the regulator is at. Have you removed the complete balance from the cock and touched the hairspring to see if it sticks, if the tools you are using are not anti magnetic make sure they are not magnetized, have demagnetized   the whole movement. Are you sure it has the correct mainspring, if its to strong that will cause it to gain. How much does it gain in 24 hours?

Posted
  On 11/12/2020 at 3:44 PM, MyFavoriteObsession said:

when a watch is gaining vast amounts of time and you've demagnetized.

Expand  

That has to do with hairspring, either sticking or too short or the wrong one.

Sticking can be intermitent and sometimes hard to spot, can you show top view vid of running.

Posted
  On 11/12/2020 at 5:33 PM, VWatchie said:

what you define as "extremely fast"?

Expand  

The movement has a beat rate of 18,000A/h and my timegrapher auto-detects it as 21,6000A/h. 

 

  On 11/12/2020 at 5:34 PM, Nucejoe said:

someone slapped a hairspring on balance which didn't belong or the balance wheel doesn't.

Expand  

This is what I suspected, as I have no idea who has worked on this watch before me. 

 

The hairspring is correctly positioned in the regulator, I tested the hairspring with pegwood to check for sticking/magnetism, and the entire watch and my tools have been demagnetized. 

  On 11/12/2020 at 5:47 PM, oldhippy said:

Are you sure it has the correct mainspring

Expand  

I am not sure at all. The 10BM uses a 10AK hairspring and I have some here that I can test with. I'll try this step next. Thank you all for your advice. 

 

 

Posted
  On 11/12/2020 at 6:54 PM, MyFavoriteObsession said:

The movement has a beat rate of 18,000A/h and my timegrapher auto-detects it as 21,6000A/h.

 

Expand  

Considering distinctness of 21600a/h , your balance complete or its hairspring  is highly likely to be off of different variant.

Doesn't belong would not vibrate to the watch.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 11/12/2020 at 3:44 PM, MyFavoriteObsession said:

Hello again, I have a 1950 Bulova 10BM movement that is running extremely fast. I do not know the watch's history. So far, I have demagnetized, cleaned, and lubricated, and it is still gaining time. The hairspring is clean, not bent, coils are not stuck together or magnetized. I was wondering, when a watch is gaining vast amounts of time and you've demagnetized and cleaned but you don't know the watch's history, what are the next steps you would take to determine the cause?

Expand  

I would look for some anomaly with the hairspring. Is it touching the balance arms at all. Is there a small hair touching the hairspring. Is it bunching up under the balance coc and you can’t see it?

Posted

I'm currently working on a Bulova 8AE with the same problem.  I had a prior Bulova that someone had shortened the hairspring on and then removed the regulator arm to make it a free-sprung balance in an effort to get it to run.  Run it did!  It gained several hours/24 hours.

 

The problem with the current movement, the 8AE is that the amplitude is really crappy, not even 180 degrees.  This despite a cleaning, demag, new MS, and a completely clean hairspring.  One clue is that with a fully wound mainspring, additional pressure on the crown in the winding direction will improve the amplitude.  Thus, the power is not being generated or not making it thru the train to the escape wheel.

 

This movement runs and gains 1 hour/12H.  Check your amplitude.  Good Luck.

 


RMD

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

So I had a similar issue with the Rolex I was working on. After cleaning the balance with hairspring, I noticed that some of the leaves were actually sticking together but were impossible to see as they were under the balance cock. I disassembled it all and looked at the hairspring under my stereo microscope and immediately saw that there was oil of some sort between 2 leaves, thereby shortening the length and speeding up the watch. This also impacted the amplitude. I place the hairspring in lighter fluid for 30 min, then grabbed the stud and moved it around a bit. When examining it again, perfect results and no indication of any remaining oil. I think this is in the end of my video. 
Assembly - Rolex Oyster Everest Precision 1957 https://youtu.be/7AqT-bL7wcc



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also still use my cheap first set of screwdrivers. I replaced the blades of the smallest (0.6mm) with higher quality once I had bent a few of the originals, but beyond that I have been fine. Note though that I do not work on any remotely valuable watches and most of what I deal with are in a truly terrible state, watches that have been banging around in kitchen drawers or toolboxes. So my concern for screw head slot integrity and scratches is usually not very high.  As for a loupe - you won't need anything powerful for an ST36 that is new. You don't need to do close inspection of balance pivots because they will not be worn out, and a 3x or 5x loupe is perfectly sufficient to see the oiling. I don't have any microscope or powerful magnification of any sort. I just use cheap loupes. But again this would be different if I were working with more valuable watches. And if I had equipment to burnish pivots, then I would get a microscope to check my work.
    • I've recently switched over to using a x2.5 -x3 eyeglass for disassembly and some larger part assembly. It's interesting to see how accustomed and trained your eyes become to that way of working after using a microscope for years. And pick up and work at eyelevel when possible. Personally I would stick with and learn to use regular oilers efficiently. 
    • I remember playing with asbestos wire insultaion when I was a kid (remember the cool fluffy white stuff?) and I've been breathing fine dust particles in my woodworking shop for years, so I'm probably toast either way, but I don't want any of this radioactive dust anywhere near my kids.
    • Its good to understand how and why demagnetisers work. These two pieces of text explain in basic terms how ferrous metal is affected by magnetism and why they can retain some of those properties.  The cheap demagnetiser is actually a magnetiser,but is used in a way that can remove the weak magnetic properties that a steel has gained through magnetic field exposure.  As steel is drawn further away from the device, the magnetic fields around it become progressively weaker and more -irregular- . This causes the disruption of the atomic and subatomic alignments within the steel that make it magnetised. So also moving the steel  through different orientations as its pulled away could actually improve that process. I still use my first cheap set of drivers, I notice very little difference in the way of feel between them and a set of preowned Bergeon I use, blade quality is more important. Tweezers have more variables, but again they don't have to be expensive to work well. My most used tweezers are my cheapest, but then I never use any pair that I haven't modified in some way. 
×
×
  • Create New...