Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So putting the hands on and bench timing , gives the only data with excellent degree of confidence. For all we know, despite running this new balance might not be right one for the watch.

We can't count on TG either, it shows 18000 when set manually and in 7-8 seconds switches back again.

Posted
5 hours ago, praezis said:

Last photo: Imho these are totally different balance wheels.

yes physically there different but they hairspring is have a similar look? There doesn't appear to be much of a terminal curve? I would really like to see the balance wheel in the watch with a close-up picture aimed at the hairspring regulator pins?

Posted

If the new oscilator actually beats 19800 it would run the 18000 beat train fast which is what the first tg reading indicate, but OP reports the watch running either slow or really late and( I am not sure I understand what he means by really late). 

Watch runs with the new oscillator so we have escapement but if this oscilator is a wrong one and so is the new roller table  then impulse should be imperfect and  OP should not see a happy running watch, I mean it can run but not happy.

I sympathise with OP, all data has remained inconclusive. I think a bench timing will shed some real light.

 

 

Posted

Perhaps take some more photos as John suggests, to show if it is mounted correctly. A slo-mo video can also be handy. 
 

I’m surprised that the balance diameter is different, but the fact that it sort-of-runs suggests it could be correct. Do the rollers look like they have similar proportions?

Posted

I will take some more photos with the balance mounted. I will have a look at the roller jewels as well.

@Nucejoe it runs 45 mins fast in 6 hours, so about 3 hours over a full day.  That ratio 24/27 = 0.89 is very close to the ratio of the bph: 18000/19800 = 0.91.

Posted
15 minutes ago, GaspardColigny said:

I will take some more photos with the balance mounted. I will have a look at the roller jewels as well.

@Nucejoe it runs 45 mins fast in 6 hours, so about 3 hours over a full day.  That ratio 24/27 = 0.89 is very close to the ratio of the bph: 18000/19800 = 0.91.

Wrong balance complete then. 

Can be a case of modified caliber of its family/ generation. 

No use wasting time on this one, you should get the right balance complete.

Best wishes

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The new balance had similar dimensions as the old one, and upon installing it, proved to be the correct balance. Timegrapher shows +6, around 290 amplitude and the BE is 0.4. so very chuffed. The Eta 900 is now ticking away happily in the first watch I've completed: this late 40's, early 50's Stowa, with an immaculate dial. 

 

IMG-20201023-WA0000.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I see why you like this watch, a nice classic look, enjoy it in good health.

Surely you know, that old balance can be vibrated with a compatable hairspring to produce the right frequency, lots of fun without a vibrating tool though. 

Regards joe

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

I see why you like this watch, a nice classic look, enjoy it in good health.

Surely you know, that old balance can be vibrated with a compatable hairspring to produce the right frequency, lots of fun without a vibrating tool though. 

Regards joe

Thanks, vibrating hairsping and balance...in due time perhaps haha.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @oldhippy, hasn't been on since the 14th of April, I messaged him nine days ago, no reply.  I  hope he's on an around the world trip with endless booze and supermodels.   joking apart, I  hope he's alright. Does anyone know anything? 
    • Some of the older American companies did at least claim to manufacture them so reliably that any one of their tailstocks should perfectly center any one of their headstocks. But it would take probably someone like nickelsilver to verify that in a big enough collection.
    • You also have another potential issue with head and tail stocks, in my research it would seem that for the American style lathes the head and tail stocks were bored as a pair. So a matched pair is good a “pair “ made up from two different lathes cause some headaches. The Swiss Geneva style lathes are much lighter but were apparently made to fit any lathe. I have seen mention of being able to shim the tailstock as well to true up. indexing is again not so straightforward for a watchmaker lathe, at least not as I have found so far. Often a lathe will come with basic indexing which is limited to 60 positions. The full index plates do come up at times for eywatering prices. It is very possible to do that electronically. As well as what @SwissSeiko maybe able to point you to have a look here. https://imakewatches.com/projects/CNCIndexDriver.html   https://imakewatches.com/projects/MillingAttachment.html   Tom
    • On a watch repair discussion group that you know that we love to see naked watches out of the case you show us a box? I think a book on watchmakers lathes should be helpful.   The watchmakers' lathe, its use and abuse; a story of the lathe in its various forms, past and present, its construction and proper uses by     Goodrich, Ward L https://archive.org/details/watchmakerslathe00good  
    • Got it. So a WW lathe will have that graduated drive pulley for different speeds and similar setup for the bed and tailstock, but they won't be fully compatible with one another in terms of parts. Thanks! The picture helps a lot.
×
×
  • Create New...