Jump to content

ETA 7750 Oscillator bearing.


Len33

Recommended Posts

Good evening, everyone and, hopefully, you are all well.

I have successfully stripped, cleaned, and reassembled an ETA 7750 automatic chronograph. It has superb time keeping abilities now, as shown  on my timegrapher, in four positions. Ok, that's lovely. 

Now, to the nitty gritty.

I bought a new bearing to replace the sloppy old one and, no matter how I try, the new bearing just will not go into the oscillating weight.

It is a friction fit type, not the one that uses the Bergeon tool.

Also, I got the bearing from Cousins, not China.

Now, I am wondering if there is a difference between an ETA 7750 watch and  Valjoux 7750.

If there is, that may be the answer because I just cannot keep trying to line this bearing up with the oscillating weight and tapping away at it because, to use a technicle term, 'something will go for a Burton'!

So, has anyone got any idea about how to complete this task?

I have watched Mark's video and that does not help.

I have tried warming the oscillating weight first, but it cools faster than the tax man helping himself to my earnings!

Okey-dokey, over to you.

Thanks for reading this and all the best.

Len.

 

 

 

IMG_4610.JPG

IMG_4612.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Len33 said:

If there is, that may be the answer because I just cannot keep trying to line this bearing up with the oscillating weight and tapping away at it because, to use a technicle term, 'something will go for a Burton'!

Can you measure bearing and hole. A decent digital caliper will be enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good evening, JDM.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Yes I did try to do that and, although it was very difficult, I do think that there was gnats whisker larger with the new bearing.

That is why I am wondering about the two models.

Regards.

Len.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they might be even totaly different in construction. I took a picture so you easier can see what I mean.
Newer ETA 7750 is locked in place by a shim and need a special tool.
Old Valjoux 7750 is press fitted.
These boths systems have different diameters on the bearing hole on the oscillating weight too.
So the Valjoux is smaller and will not stay in the newer oscillators hole.
The ETA has a larger diameter and will not go into the Valjoux ocillators hole.
Hope this helps.
7750.thumb.jpg.055c46407d81a1eabf03614014395515.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for this information, it helps very much.

If I have understood this correctly, it would seem that I have an ETA  7500 bearing and, for some reason, a Valjoux 7500 weight.

The bearing that I got from Cousins will not press into the weight.

The one that I removed, did.

The watch I have, is definitely a 17 jewel ETA 7500.

In your picture, the bearing on the right looks like the one I removed from 

the oscillating weight and the one on the left looks like the one I got from Cousins.

Anyway, "thanks" again for your post.

Len.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the 17 Jewel you have the right oscillating weight. Since ETA took over the production they had the old equipment and drawings too. So, just looking at your oscillating weight you can see it is missing the shallow groove for the locking shim which is on the 25 jewel one.  The 17 jewel version of the 7750 is the one to the right in my picture.

The pressfitt bearing is like 2 tens of a milimeter smaller in diameter. 
Easiest way to determine if you got the right bearing is to meassure the hole you got on the oscillating weight and on the small flange on the bearing. If you look at your last picture it is the small bit peaking up you see on the bearing to the right.
If the part you got isn't completely circular but got four straight edges on the flange like it looks to be on the bearing to the left in your picture, then you for sure know it is the wrong bearing, that one is for the 25 Jewel one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HSL said:

If you have the 17 Jewel you have the right oscillating weight. Since ETA took over the production they had the old equipment and drawings too. So, just looking at your oscillating weight you can see it is missing the shallow groove for the locking shim which is on the 25 jewel one.  The 17 jewel version of the 7750 is the one to the right in my picture.

The pressfitt bearing is like 2 tens of a milimeter smaller in diameter. 
Easiest way to determine if you got the right bearing is to meassure the hole you got on the oscillating weight and on the small flange on the bearing. If you look at your last picture it is the small bit peaking up you see on the bearing to the right.
If the part you got isn't completely circular but got four straight edges on the flange like it looks to be on the bearing to the left in your picture, then you for sure know it is the wrong bearing, that one is for the 25 Jewel one.

The new bearing that I have from Cousins, has indeed got the four flat bits that you mention. 

Incidentally, the bearing on the right of my pictures is the old one.

So that confirms I have the wrong bearing.

I have searched the internet for the press fit one (No flat bits) and, so far, I have drawn a blank.

 

 

IMG_4610.JPG

IMG_4612.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile, and not less mobile which is the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
    • The description there is exactly how it's done, and it's very well written!
    • Would it be correct to say that the stronger the mainspring, the thicker the oil should be? So for a fusee mainspring, should a thick grease be used?
×
×
  • Create New...