Jump to content

ETA 7750 Oscillator bearing.


Len33

Recommended Posts

Good evening, everyone and, hopefully, you are all well.

I have successfully stripped, cleaned, and reassembled an ETA 7750 automatic chronograph. It has superb time keeping abilities now, as shown  on my timegrapher, in four positions. Ok, that's lovely. 

Now, to the nitty gritty.

I bought a new bearing to replace the sloppy old one and, no matter how I try, the new bearing just will not go into the oscillating weight.

It is a friction fit type, not the one that uses the Bergeon tool.

Also, I got the bearing from Cousins, not China.

Now, I am wondering if there is a difference between an ETA 7750 watch and  Valjoux 7750.

If there is, that may be the answer because I just cannot keep trying to line this bearing up with the oscillating weight and tapping away at it because, to use a technicle term, 'something will go for a Burton'!

So, has anyone got any idea about how to complete this task?

I have watched Mark's video and that does not help.

I have tried warming the oscillating weight first, but it cools faster than the tax man helping himself to my earnings!

Okey-dokey, over to you.

Thanks for reading this and all the best.

Len.

 

 

 

IMG_4610.JPG

IMG_4612.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Len33 said:

If there is, that may be the answer because I just cannot keep trying to line this bearing up with the oscillating weight and tapping away at it because, to use a technicle term, 'something will go for a Burton'!

Can you measure bearing and hole. A decent digital caliper will be enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good evening, JDM.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Yes I did try to do that and, although it was very difficult, I do think that there was gnats whisker larger with the new bearing.

That is why I am wondering about the two models.

Regards.

Len.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they might be even totaly different in construction. I took a picture so you easier can see what I mean.
Newer ETA 7750 is locked in place by a shim and need a special tool.
Old Valjoux 7750 is press fitted.
These boths systems have different diameters on the bearing hole on the oscillating weight too.
So the Valjoux is smaller and will not stay in the newer oscillators hole.
The ETA has a larger diameter and will not go into the Valjoux ocillators hole.
Hope this helps.
7750.thumb.jpg.055c46407d81a1eabf03614014395515.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for this information, it helps very much.

If I have understood this correctly, it would seem that I have an ETA  7500 bearing and, for some reason, a Valjoux 7500 weight.

The bearing that I got from Cousins will not press into the weight.

The one that I removed, did.

The watch I have, is definitely a 17 jewel ETA 7500.

In your picture, the bearing on the right looks like the one I removed from 

the oscillating weight and the one on the left looks like the one I got from Cousins.

Anyway, "thanks" again for your post.

Len.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the 17 Jewel you have the right oscillating weight. Since ETA took over the production they had the old equipment and drawings too. So, just looking at your oscillating weight you can see it is missing the shallow groove for the locking shim which is on the 25 jewel one.  The 17 jewel version of the 7750 is the one to the right in my picture.

The pressfitt bearing is like 2 tens of a milimeter smaller in diameter. 
Easiest way to determine if you got the right bearing is to meassure the hole you got on the oscillating weight and on the small flange on the bearing. If you look at your last picture it is the small bit peaking up you see on the bearing to the right.
If the part you got isn't completely circular but got four straight edges on the flange like it looks to be on the bearing to the left in your picture, then you for sure know it is the wrong bearing, that one is for the 25 Jewel one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HSL said:

If you have the 17 Jewel you have the right oscillating weight. Since ETA took over the production they had the old equipment and drawings too. So, just looking at your oscillating weight you can see it is missing the shallow groove for the locking shim which is on the 25 jewel one.  The 17 jewel version of the 7750 is the one to the right in my picture.

The pressfitt bearing is like 2 tens of a milimeter smaller in diameter. 
Easiest way to determine if you got the right bearing is to meassure the hole you got on the oscillating weight and on the small flange on the bearing. If you look at your last picture it is the small bit peaking up you see on the bearing to the right.
If the part you got isn't completely circular but got four straight edges on the flange like it looks to be on the bearing to the left in your picture, then you for sure know it is the wrong bearing, that one is for the 25 Jewel one.

The new bearing that I have from Cousins, has indeed got the four flat bits that you mention. 

Incidentally, the bearing on the right of my pictures is the old one.

So that confirms I have the wrong bearing.

I have searched the internet for the press fit one (No flat bits) and, so far, I have drawn a blank.

 

 

IMG_4610.JPG

IMG_4612.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello good watch folk ,I  just fancied a light hearted discussion after my head was starting to spin over Epilame 😅. Specifically I'm meaning the sale of vintage watches, say nothing past the 1980s market. The stuff we see on ebay and other similar sites and found at carboots, curio shops etc. And are  we thinking its reaching a peak volume ?  Younger generations clearing out passed parents and grandparents possessions.  The younger folk are not as sentimental as the old fogies ( I'm now nearly at an age that i used to think was old fogie age ). When might it have started ?  i often wish i discovered the hobby much much sooner when selling your grandfathers pocket watch at a boot sale for a few quid was just a way to offload some tat. And when might it slow down. Thoughts anyone ?
    • Yes i did eventually realise that the oil will act as a barrier, I'm sure the discussion will continue. Ive had two oleophobic coffees ( added coconut ) and in the meantime i have this just delivered to take my mind off epilame for the time being. My favourite type of dial, its a beautiful looking watch traditional English made and it runs,  the ticktock is phenomenal,  i can hear it across my living room .  You wont believe how much it was. Thats interesting about synthetic oils , i thought the same, going from a 2 year service to 5 years is a big drop in income for service folk.  I expect some did well when they embraced the use of synthetic,  probably drawing in more customers than those that didn't use the new fangled substances , i bet fairly short lived though. The more frequent service makes more sense to me, not for just the service but for the regular check up inspections that might pick up impending faults. As far as epilame goes, wouldn't it be great to be able to fumigate the complete movement in a sealed jar of heated stearic acid, 🤔 now theres a thought 😅.
    • Imm going to close the discussion by attaching the photo of my super-titanium after several vicissitudes finally working. Purchased as not working I replaced the battery and for a stroke of luck I found its semi-new solar panel which, having verified its operation, seems to recharge the accumulator perfectly. I had taken this watch almost by bet, with 40 euros I brought it back to life. The initial half idea was to resell it to finance another purchase, but.. it's definitely a nice item. It would need to check the impermeability but it's a pleasure to see it on the wrist 😃
    • In fact the secret is to go gently and find the way without forcing, and the movement enters without problems
    • Yea a have given it a full service this movement is chinese 2813 whats the lift angle for this movement does anyone knows  and how  do a remove the default  of 52 degrees on my timegrapher?   Hi you said my lift angle is default how do a remove this from my timegrapher?
×
×
  • Create New...