Jump to content

Elgin Sportsman 17 Jewels


madchops67

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone!... This is my first post and I am new to this forum and watch repair. I am taken by all the beautiful watches and collections I see here, very impressive. This is my first project "Elgin Sportsman 17 Jewels" and I don't know the movement (823?) any help or input is appreciated! For $8.00 off ebay and a little lubrication I got this baby running...best feeling ever.

post-691-0-56931600-1423915594_thumb.jpg

post-691-0-36623900-1423915600_thumb.jpg

post-691-0-35193400-1423915605_thumb.jpg

post-691-0-64773900-1423917091_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WillFly, Thanks for the welcoming... the movement says Swiss and I uploaded a new photo of it. I will do some research from the link you have provided and hope to find the date and all that corresponds to the watch...thanks again for your help, truly appreciate it!

p.s your collection is outstanding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Kinda late for this post but I just started servicing my own watches and have the same Elgin Sportsman 17 jewel watch.

During disassembly I found the mainspring was broken. Now the hunt for a new mainspring. Just testing the waters with old pocket watches and wrist watches to get my nerve up to venture into the automatic's and hopefully into the chrono's.

So far I have fixed 5 vintage mechanical winding watches and running very good according to my Timegrapher, Only broke one old pocket watch  ( I messed up the hairspring) and lost a click spring that flew into outer space on another watch.

I'm finding that the balance cock and hairspring procedures to be the most difficult for me, especially during re-assembly.

Still assembling tools for my next task of replacing the balance wheel staff. Mark Lovick makes it look sooooo easy, but I know its gonna be a real challenge. My best results were with a Hydepark that I purchased on the bay that was pretty rough. It was a real challenge servicing on such a small movement. I think its from the 1950's and the case size is only 30mm not including the crown.

Pictures are of the finished product. I should have taken some before I started. It was a mess of dirt and some rust and the balance wheel was stuck solid and mainspring was wound to the max. but I was amazed that it now has a power reserve of almost 38 hours. A little polish and a new dress and she sure is pretty :~)

 

CIMG6221.JPG

CIMG6209.JPG

CIMG6217.JPG

CIMG6227.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Madchops, I too am pretty new and learning more everyday, the first watch I repaired was a Seiko 6119-6400 and on completion I was like a dog with two tails, I really felt that I had achieved something worthwhile and now I am fully addicted LOL. In truth I wouldn't have been able to do it without the help and guidance of the "Watch repair forum" and it's knowledgeable members. Best regards. Johnnie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...