Jump to content

A bit of History : 1945 document from US Army on watch maintenance


Recommended Posts

Hello, 

 

As a 'Newbie' I'm browsing the net to discover technics , guidelines etc. on my new hobbie.

I found that document from US war department dating 1945 about : 'Ordnance maintenance for Wrist watches' ...as you'll notice it's also an introduction manual for vintage watches, and some american watch models

Looking at it, I thought to myself how lucky we're to have internet and online courses ...

P.S : name of the attachment, is the official document name in US army archives

 

 

TM 9-1575.pdf

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GeoMontreal said:

I found that document from US war department dating 1945 about : 'Ordnance maintenance for Wrist watches' .

Please don't be put off, but the document you've attached is well know and has been posted here not less than 7 times, most prominent ones are below.
Be welcome here and if in doubt on anything just use the search box top right or "google site search" for multi-word searchers.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me there should be a library on this site... A single thread, maybe even a curated one if it's possible within the forum engine to keep editing windows open indefinitely, wherein all such literature is deposited and organized. Most of this stuff is copyright free, so it should be simply a matter of getting it compiled and organized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Seems to me there should be a library on this site.

I thought at one time there was a library of PDFs but it seems to have gone missing? My guess is that maybe Mark ran out of space. The only exception to that rule is every single time somebody attaches a PDF over and over and over again soon the message board gets overloaded with attachments be better to point to a single library somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

More or less what I had in mind. I've seen the 7S26 service sheet posted at least a few dozen times, for instance. For it to be useful though, there must be curation. A random list of documents doesn't do anyone any good.

No point in even trying. Do you think that the next guy attempting to fix his Seiko 5 will search before asking? No he will not, better said, probably many do and we can;t know, but still some doesn't, and kindly are given the answer every time. BTW did you know that you can quickly include anything that you attached before? Just click "insert other media" and search for it.
The info is all out there already, starting with Cousins UK that does a tremendous job with this stuff. If even one hundred 1kb sheets get separately posted thousand of times that is not even a drop in the ocean of the Internet capacity. Just learn how to search, and if something really matters to you save a private copy or print it. And if you find that Cousins don't have it, send it to them.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...