Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi there,Can anyone help me with what size I need to turn down a length of steel to put a number 13 thread from a screw plate on??I am rather confused on how this sizing works and would be most grateful if anyone can help me with any information on sizes of steel or brass before threading.Regards, Seth.

Posted

face a length?

or turn down a diameter?

two different things. which one? for diameter, look up "thread pitch", "thread pitch major diameter" and "thread pitch minor diameter." or I just totally misunderstood your question.

Posted

Hi there the screwplate I have is the one I enclose a photo of I got this in a set with all the taps from Cousins UK.The reason I want to find out the correct size of material is I have to replace a couple of case screws on an old pocket watch that have the heads broken in half and I have managed to get them out.I have tried threading a piece of 1.10 steel with a number 13 on the screwplate but the threadform  seems rather flat so before I go ahead and turn blank screws on my Lorch I want to find out the correct size of material I need to use.The origina broken case screws fit the number 13 screwplate fine and a number 13 tap screws into the watch plate perfectly.Regards Seth.

IMG_20200709_043928123.jpg

Posted (edited)

To tap a hole for a screw to fit in it, then you use the 'thread pitch minor diam' for the drill diameter.  This will drill a hole the size of the bottom of the threads of the screw.  The tap will then take out the metal between this diam and the top of the thread in form of the thread.  A larger diameter drill will mean the thread depth is not full and so may strip easy if the screw is tightened too much or just be too loose a fit.  A smaller diameter drill will mean the tap is cutting into more metal and if care is not taken will jam the tap and snap it.  Normally most screw threads will have tables that show the tap drill diameter.  The smaller the screw size then the closer the tap needs to match the pitch minor diameter.

For making a screw, then you use the 'thread pitch major diam' for the blank rod/wire diameter.  The rest is similar to above, but too big diam will mean more metal removal and possible breaking of the blank in the die, and too small diam will result in a loose fit and possible stripping when tightened.

There are basically 2 forms of tap/die for each size.  One is tapered to allow easier starting of the tapping stage but will not tap all the way to the bottom of a hole or all the way to a shoulder on a screw.  The second will do this and is normally used after the tapered one.

The secret is to use some oil or grease on the tap/die when working steel and tougher metals.and ensure the tap/die is fully square to the work-piece. If you don't have tapping paste/oil then try and use one with EP (ie motor EP gear oil or Moebius EP 1300 etc,) even engine oil will do as these have additives that work to reduce friction at the cutting edge of the tap/die and only come into effect at those local high temps.  Brass, copper and aluminium can mainly be cut without a lube or just use paraffin oil.

Take it slow and just cut a very small bit at a time, backing off every now and then to clear out any swarf, don't force the tap/die.  When following a tapered tap with an end tap always clear out the swarf so you have a clean start with the next tap.

The pitch is simply the distance between adjacent thread peaks and the form/size based on several industry standards.

 

Edited by canthus
Posted

That screwplate appears to be metric. So the sizes listed are the thread size, 20 is 2mm, 13 would be 1.3mm. So you would want to start with 1.3mm as your diameter. But- it might (probably) not cut the thread so much as cut and form the thread by displacing metal. I say that because it looks a little dubious in quality. So try a little smaller and see if you get a good thread form. You can turn a taper from say 1.15 to 1.3, and then thread that, and see where along the taper you get a full thread. Make a note of it for the next time you need to thread that size.

 

The old Martin screwplates had a screwy (haha) numbering system. There were two main designations from Martin, L and B; both seem to have the same thread diameters regarding their numbering, the difference is the pitch of the thread. Martin G plates were for left hand threads. Funnily enough, the "backward" numbering system for watch stems and crowns corresponds to the Martin sizing, I guess it was taken up at a time when Martin screwplates were the primary threading tool for watchmakers. 99% of the time I use industrially made metric taps and dies for threading, but sometimes for an old piece I will use a Martin plate. The threads are a little more rounded on their crests. I find that for a given size I need to turn a little undersize, as mentioned above. With new "real" metric stuff I turn to the nominal diameter.

 

 

StemTap-mm.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, nickelsilver said:

That screwplate appears to be metric. So the sizes listed are the thread size, 20 is 2mm, 13 would be 1.3mm. So you would want to start with 1.3mm as your diameter. But- it might (probably) not cut the thread so much as cut and form the thread by displacing metal. I say that because it looks a little dubious in quality. So try a little smaller and see if you get a good thread form. You can turn a taper from say 1.15 to 1.3, and then thread that, and see where along the taper you get a full thread. Make a note of it for the next time you need to thread that size.

 

The old Martin screwplates had a screwy (haha) numbering system. There were two main designations from Martin, L and B; both seem to have the same thread diameters regarding their numbering, the difference is the pitch of the thread. Martin G plates were for left hand threads. Funnily enough, the "backward" numbering system for watch stems and crowns corresponds to the Martin sizing, I guess it was taken up at a time when Martin screwplates were the primary threading tool for watchmakers. 99% of the time I use industrially made metric taps and dies for threading, but sometimes for an old piece I will use a Martin plate. The threads are a little more rounded on their crests. I find that for a given size I need to turn a little undersize, as mentioned above. With new "real" metric stuff I turn to the nominal diameter.

 

 

StemTap-mm.jpg

Brilliant, many many thanks for your reply and help I will now have an afternoon tinkering with my lathes to see how it works.I have a Lorch lathe with lots of accessories and I have just bought myself a brand new Proxxon lathe as I'm retired and have lots of time (no pun meant) to tinker with old watches.Take care,keep safe and many thanks ,Regards,Seth.

Posted (edited)

I hate saying this, but that looks like an Indian screw plate and if so, I would consider chucking it in the bin unless you just want to use it for mucking about. The taps they come with are horrendous - they just snap. I’m not sure what thread they are supposed to conform to, but I’d experiment using ISO/metric Swiss stem threads and inserting them into the plate to see if they bind. I do own one of these plate and tap sets. 
 

For sizes down to 1.0mm, the common SE Asian set made from HSS is excellent.

For individual sizes, WIRU Germany sell high quality taps and dies. I used mine the other week to make a shouldered 0.8mm screw for a JLC hack lever.

In terms of rod size for a particular thread, I usually experiment. The WIRU set gives a hole size for the taps which may give you a feeling about the difference in size required. In practice, I find the rod size is very close to the major diameter. I always taper the start of the rod (and cut off later). For tapping holes, a broach to adjust can be a good idea, not only because it gets the diameter just right, but because it creates a slight taper to start.

 

A3BB5DB8-1653-4908-ABE7-0D2EEE9AC6CF.jpeg

Edited by rodabod

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...