Jump to content

Fusee Clock keeping poor time


4ster

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, 4ster said:

Sure looks like the cone does not match and equalize the properties of the spring

Yes. I would have a look at the spring. Rather than assume the spring is incorrect, I would check to see if the spring is very "set".

I think I'm possibly correct in saying that according to Hooke's law, you may actually get relatively more torque at the start of winding when the spring is set due to the angle of rotation, but I've never measured this myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, if the spring is too strong it may be too short and nearing or at the end of wind when fully wound. Even with the fusee it may be giving too much power, which with a recoil escapement can actually drop the amplitude due to strong friction during recoil. My gut says slightly weaker spring and slightly lighter pendulum, I do a number of clocks in this pendulum length and 150g is average, springs maybe 0.25 or 0.3 thick, no fusee and they keep time well. Recoil escapement.

There's a lot at play, a well proportioned recoil escapement can give a deadbeat a run for its money on precision. I go with OH's gut feeling that the escapement is dry and possible spring issue. My first step would be get a bunch of Moebius 8300 on those escape teeth and note the difference. Check palettes (again Old Hippy). They should be smooth and polished. If that doesn't help pull it all apart and check the spring. You want generally 3/4 to 1 turn pretension, and have a reserve of 1 wind when the fusee stop piece comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

My gut says slightly weaker spring and slightly lighter pendulum, I do a number of clocks in this pendulum length and 150g is average

I don't think these clocks where designed to use a light weight pendulum the eight day fusee timepiece movements used a standardised pendulum and bob which is heavy at 250 to 260 grams. Williamsons aim in production was to have completely interchangeable parts between clocks which they achieved at the Salisbury factory before it burnt down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing you can do why the movement is out of the case is inspect how much torque is getting through the train of wheels at different states of wind - have a feel at how much force there is turning the escape wheel while the pallets are removed. This may give you a better idea about the state of the spring, or if as suggested by others, if escapement friction is upsetting things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think these clocks where designed to use a light weight pendulum the eight day fusee timepiece movements used a standardised pendulum and bob which is heavy at 250 to 260 grams. Williamsons aim in production was to have completely interchangeable parts between clocks which they achieved at the Salisbury factory before it burnt down.
Yeah I was reading about that (the interchangeability), figured the pendulum weight was maybe slightly heavier on a fusee. The clocks I see here with a similar pendulum/escapement are typically "neuchateloise" with either thin springs making 14ish turns of wind with a well engineered outer hook (very even power delivery) or similar with a close to deadbeat escapement and good hook- bridles, not holes, and a more typical 6 turns of wind.

My gut feeling is too strong mainspring (short) and possibly dry and/or damaged pallets.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting interpretation of "traditional". I would say that Loctite is definitely the up-to-date and appropriate stuff to use, however, it is a relatively modern solution. Before the advent of such esoteric solutions I believe that the "traditional" thread locker of choice may well have been a sugar solution. Once applied the water would evaporate and the sugar would crystalise, locking the threads tight.
    • @steve1811uk close but no cigar 🙂 I don't smoke anyway. I checked in my stock of parts and that's the closest I got to your dimensions. Good luck in your search. @RichardHarris123 I have an accumulation of all sorts of odds and ends that I acquired as a result of buying up the tail ends of old watchmakers estates. Usually after all of the great stuff has been stripped out, which means that the sweepings off of the workshop floor can be had for peanuts, but if you have the patience, can often be found to contain gold (both literally and figuratively 🙂 ). These came to me through on of those purchases. I doubt that I will personally be able to make use of even 10% of my accumulated stock, but having it, and knowing what I have, means that I can at least pass bits on to those who can use it whenever possible.
    • Hi and thank-you for your suggestions, as per Mark's instructions I checked my browser "Safari" and spell check and grammar was not ticked. So all sorted. Thanks CJ  
    • As an alternative, clear nail Polish, the advantage is you can have a manicure at the same time. 
    • I use Grammarly. It works really well and If English is not your first language, you will also receive help with formulations. There is a free version that covers most of my needs. It installs as a plug-in and works with all browsers and word processors.
×
×
  • Create New...