Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since I just got a circa an early 1990s Longines VHP I've started tracking it to the image of a clock on the NIST Atomic clock site.  I was shocked to see my watch had lost and gained few seconds over 5 days. So today I compared it again and it was -2.74 s. Then I looked more closely at the NIST numerical clock and  image of the clock below it.  They were different, and the clock image was -2.74 and stated "your device's clock is off by 2.74 s". I never imagined the clock image was representing my varying computer clock. Bottom line it it was a relief to learn my watch is right on time and my computer clock varies. Thought I would post this in case others are looking at NIST clock like I did.

\

Henryr

Posted

I often wonder just how precise time needs to be,I have around 80 watches, and thirty clocks and can say that the old adage is very true if you own a clock you know the time if you own more than one you are never quite sure :fpc:

  • Like 2
Posted

I was very surprised about the computer and I've noticed, when watching the news on TV the clock, usually shown in the lower right, is also wrong by a few seconds. Live and learn.

Posted (edited)

Inaccurate time on PC is due to poor OS implementation which uses a single time server, often also inexact like time.windows.com. Below an article on how to change this setting to a better one, like e.g. uk.pool.ntp.org if you're in the UK, or replace uk with your country code. Doing that I have about 0.3 sec difference with the NIST web page, and that is very normal because of the delay between said USA server and a PC in e.g. Europe.

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/how-to-force-windows-10-time-to-synch-with-a-time/20f3b546-af38-42fb-a2d0-d4df13cc8f43

Edited by jdm
Posted

This is very evident when trying to purchase from eBay. You're down to the last few seconds and you place a bid at the last 2 seconds and 5 others bid and you miss out. Turns out there were a couple extra seconds because your computer time and the time on the eBay servers was different. Annoying!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm a newb who is a bit late to the party here. I've purchased a Horia movement holder clone. And I'm aware that the support pins for the SW500 chronograph jewels can be different sizes. I purchased 0.8mm pins with the holder. These were all that were available at the time. Will these be the right size? Can someone shed a little light on this for me please?
    • That looks fantastic! I'm obviously a little late to the party here. Can you tell me where you sourced the case that you used in this build?
    • If pivot shoulder almost touches the mainplate, you will see lower amplitude and free oscilation comes to stop quicker. Such touching can stop the watch. This caliber is based on FHF, I think. So some parts of a cheaper movement of same caliber might interchange.  Both observation point to pivot worn short, which support you suspect , "worn pivot".  The problem with pivots wear to this point is , though the watch runs, pivots can easily jump out of jewel holes in the event of shock, pivots are actually not touching the end stones.   Classic watch repair recommends staff replacement or elongating pivots. Non classic let's you flip the end stones to have the dome side of end stone facing the pivot end, this will somewhat or wholly  compensate for the wear.  Regs  
    • This watch has a pin end mainspring. It's a blued steel spring and may be the original >100 year old part. As you can see, it is quite set. Can anyone suggest where I might be able to obtain such a spring today? Dimensions: Height: 140 Thickness: 010 Arbor diameter: 340 Barrel diameter 989 (1/100 mm)  
    • Many thanks for your answers: 1. I will clean both of them without risk 🙂 2. Both of the rotate inside their setting but they don't seem to come out. I will clean the cock (and the hole jewels) and I will see if they want to go out. I don't intend to force the setting pushing it out by any means. I only hope I don't need the dismantle the whole cock into all its components...! 3. I won't touch it. Only clean. I don't want to take risk... Thanks again! Thanks for your anwer. Yes, I meant short. In fact there are 2 pictures where It can be seen that the balance almost touch the main plate. The balance only spin freely when I loosen the cock screw and also the bottom jewel setting. I cleaned the exterior jewels on the cock and on the main plate. But I can't take the interior settings. I uploaded 1 picture on this  My reply to your comments are below. Apologies as I Replied rather than quote... 
×
×
  • Create New...