Jump to content

kbp


kbp

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody.  I am a babe just emerging from the woods.  I've always be fascinated by watches and now I've time to learn about them.  Must say I've been reading post and answers for sometime whilst attempting simple repairs.  Now I'm diving deeper into certain topics and need access to technical items etc. hoping to glean insight.  Thanks for being available to those of us who are learning to crawl this intricate world of sophisticated tiny machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Nucejoe.

To further my introduction to this forum, I am, at best, an amateur 'watch repairer'.  Primarily, I am interested in mechanical watches, and plan to maintain and repair some that I own.

However, until I am learned and competent enough to tackle my mechanical wind-ups, I am practicing on a sleek men’s Glycine quartz dress watch from the early 90’s.  I am replacing the movement.  In my search for insight about how to do this replacement I began lurking on this forum and perused other on-line sites for useful information.  It seems though that the movement must come out through the front of this watch.  I have ordered a replacement that is the same as the movement the watch currently has and some tools to aid my endeavor – wish me luck. 

I live in Virginia, USA.  Am aged mid-sixties (late to enter the game – hope I don’t become too shaky or forgetful before I am able to tackle my vintage and antique wind-ups), female (I mention this as it seems to me that very few females seem interested in what makes watches tick!) and the Glycine I’m ‘working’ on has been generously donated by my husband.

I am not always timely in responding to posts, so please do not feel I am intentionally being rude.  I hope all of you will be patient with me.  Thank you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so glad you asked!!!

The movement is an ETA 579.105  

After removing the stem, I could not remove the movement's holder and extract the movement.  The eta is firmly lodged within the solid one-piece holder - there is no play what so ever between the movement, its holder, and the case.  Upon closer inspection, the movement holder appears to extend under the perimeter of an over-lapping rim that runs the circumference of the watch case.  This rim appears to be, by design, forged as an integral part of the case itself.

Concluding the only way to remove the movement is via the watch face, I found a small indent along the seam where the bezel attaches to the watch's body, so I removed the bezel and its attached crystal.  Now I am waiting for a pair of hand remover levers that I purchased on-line to arrive...

Should I be correct in assuming the movement must come out the bezel side of the case, I wonder if this design has anything to do with the potentially ?fragile? mother-of-pearl face?  At any rate I am unable to proceed until I have safely removed the watch hands.

BTW, Glycine seems to hold their specs, even rudimentary information, about any of their back-catalog watches as though they were state-secrets.  They will, however, be pleased to repair my item, but I think the cost of transport, parts and labor would greatly exceed the monetary value of this particular watch. 

Any insight you could provide would be most welcomed.

20200306_104831.thumb.jpg.3ab0fac9d2bffc6bedb05f171cd6954c.jpg20200306_104700.thumb.jpg.8d5a66adcb1c26c1be61355ebd10d264.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kbp said:

Concluding the only way to remove the movement is via the watch face, I found a small indent along the seam where the bezel attaches to the watch's body, so I removed the bezel and its attached crystal.  Now I am waiting for a pair of hand remover levers that I purchased on-line to arrive...

You also need to remove the snap case back to access stem release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I removed the stem when the I decided the movement needed replacing - my bad for not showing the back of the watch open with its stem removed.  I'm also sending a pic of the watch front with bezel and integrated crystal removed.  I appreciate your guidance.

20200331_155410.jpg

20200331_155544.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...