Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Thinking about other tools here's an example Of another Chinese tool. In Seattle we have a school sponsored by Rolex teaching professional watchmaking and one of the students who had met had one of these before and one of the current ones I know it purchased one and as we're talking about Chinese tools this is a perfect example. Not something I would ever use but apparently the students like it and this is what was done to it notice it has a familiar sound doesn't it?

All things considered, it worked very very well outside of the box but I did service the entire thing. Disassembled it, cleaned off all the manufacturing oil, polished the pivoting points and then lubricated everything. It now works phenomenally. 

https://www.aliexpress.us/item/2255800157901825.html?spm=a2g0n.order_detail.order_detail_item.3.2e12f19cloFdqx&gatewayAdapt=Msite2Pc

I do curiosity to see what it cost from the Swiss here's what cousins is selling it for. Yes it does appear to be quite a difference in price.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/hand-fitting-multi-press-watch-bergeon-swiss?code=H40483

 

 

I also have one of these, its a little off target and on my to-do list to disassemble and tweak.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I also have one of these, its a little off target and on my to-do list to disassemble and tweak.

Me too. The pushers are a good fit in the spindle, the anvils are a little slack in the base. Both seem to line up ok but occasionally need to adjust the anvil's position within the slack on a small jewel. The mating surfaces on both the pushers and anvils are a bit rough as is the base seatings on the anvils. This does need addressing, when practicing i have noticed the jewel doesn't always enter the hole perfectly square on. 

Posted (edited)

I'm about to order one of the horia clones from ali, this will my first jewelling tool, the ali ads are confusing me, when i read the different sellers ads some listing say 4mm&4mm, and then it also says spindle hole 3mm, table hole 4mm, in the same description.

Are the pushers and anvils both 4mm or are the pushers 3mm and the anivils 4mm.

What size did you get when you received your horia clone.

 

Edited by valleyguy
Posted
On 7/27/2023 at 7:18 PM, valleyguy said:

I'm about to order one of the horia clones from ali, this will my first jewelling tool, the ali ads are confusing me, when i read the different sellers ads some listing say 4mm&4mm, and then it also says spindle hole 3mm, table hole 4mm, in the same description.

Are the pushers and anvils both 4mm or are the pushers 3mm and the anivils 4mm.

What size did you get when you received your horia clone.

 

The one i have is pushers 3mm and anvils 4mm. 

Posted (edited)

To add to the topic of Seitz (lever) vs Horia (screw).

Some Seitz presses were shipped with "thickness micrometer" attachment. I was lucky enough to score one of those before knowing what exactly it's used for.

If the zeroing screw is taken out, it effectively performs as Horia tool (pushing down the spindle by screwing in the micrometer screw).

I've documented different variations of Seitz (lever vs lever + thickness measurement) here: https://imgur.com/a/hJALq7f 

Edited by everyonesdesign
Used more proper word for an example (jewel -> spindle)
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, everyonesdesign said:

To add to the topic of Seitz (lever) vs Horia (screw).

Some Seitz presses were shipped with "thickness micrometer" attachment. I was lucky enough to score one of those before knowing what exactly it's used for.

If the zeroing screw is taken out, it effectively performs as Horia tool (pushing down the spindle by screwing in the micrometer screw).

I've documented different variations of Seitz (lever vs lever + thickness measurement) here: https://imgur.com/a/hJALq7f 

Thanks for this I will personally investigate.

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)
On 6/1/2023 at 5:02 PM, Knebo said:

putting a mainspring into the barrel

20230526_154926.thumb.jpg.3ca056dc9649aed5ac3ae546c2cee401.jpg

Quick note on my earlier post (see above): DON'T DO IT like that. It worked fine once because the anvil happened to fit extremely well. The following 2-3 times it always failed and I had a messed up mainspring.

This approach is actually quite fail safe:

I use Rodico to stabilise the brass tweezers and to ensure that they push down on the barrel evenly. I push down the tweezers with one hand - important is to have a fair amount of pressure so that the barrel can't slip away. With the other hand I pry in the mainspring with a screwdriver (flat side). It hasn't failed me yet. 

I realise that this is off-topic, but wanted to make sure nobody follows my bad example above with the Seitz press. 

20230924_224514.thumb.jpg.8db86533ea27cec6a9afcd5703b1ebaf.jpg

Edited by Knebo
  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 6/1/2023 at 5:02 PM, Knebo said:

- putting a mainspring into the barrel

20230526_154926.thumb.jpg.3ca056dc9649aed5ac3ae546c2cee401.jpg

This was interesting! It always feels a bit scary to press the spring down by hand. I believe it was Kalle Slaap who suggested that you should mainly press on the bridle to get the spring down. That is, when the bridle is in the barrel, the rest of the spring will more or less follow into the barrel automatically.

It looks like your pusher has a larger diameter than the spring. Does it really work, or is there a risk that the spring won’t come out of the spacer? Please tell us more about how you proceed!

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, VWatchie said:

This was interesting! It always feels a bit scary to press the spring down by hand. I believe it was Kalle Slaap who suggested that you should mainly press on the bridle to get the spring down. That is, when the bridle is in the barrel, the rest of the spring will more or less follow into the barrel automatically.

It looks like your pusher has a larger diameter than the spring. Does it really work, or is there a risk that the spring won’t come out of the spacer? Please tell us more about how you proceed!

 

Hi @VWatchie, please don't use this technique. It worked once by chance and then always failed. See this post where I point that out:

On 10/12/2023 at 9:36 AM, Knebo said:

Quick note on my earlier post (see above): DON'T DO IT like that. It worked fine once because the anvil happened to fit extremely well. The following 2-3 times it always failed and I had a messed up mainspring.

This approach is actually quite fail safe:

I use Rodico to stabilise the brass tweezers and to ensure that they push down on the barrel evenly. I push down the tweezers with one hand - important is to have a fair amount of pressure so that the barrel can't slip away. With the other hand I pry in the mainspring with a screwdriver (flat side). It hasn't failed me yet. 

I realise that this is off-topic, but wanted to make sure nobody follows my bad example above with the Seitz press. 

20230924_224514.thumb.jpg.8db86533ea27cec6a9afcd5703b1ebaf.jpg

Edited by Knebo
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My profile photo is age 20, last century, but I still look exactly the same so I'm not sure it counts ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • I sure appreciate your comment! I will look into one of those or maybe something similar. I of course will check your video to have a better idea.  by the way, that’s a beautiful lathe! Mine is a little peersless, but I just bought a Boley & Leinen that is on its way. That’s the one I am looking a motor for. It comes with a motor, but I want to replace it for  one that has a speed controller.
    • Indeed. I would not attempt one. Here is my messy Sherline setup
    • Hello everyone my name is Tom and I and I am new to the forum and new to the hobby. I have always had an interest in mechanical watches and finally decided to pursue it. I’m going thru online trading and have purchased the basic tools to set up a work area. I’m really looking forward to learning and thank you in advance for all of your knowledge!
    • This conversation is becoming a very confusing. The etachron system is a very nice system for manufacturing watches. As you know it consists of two components the stud and the regulator pins. Beautiful thing of this system is you can open up your regulator pins center the hairspring and as you close the pins they will close equally on both sides providing you centered it in the first place. It's not like you're going to become closer to one side or the other as the definition of the regulator pins is a bit confusing it's not exactly a slot sort of. I'm thinking maybe a little eight reading will be helpful for you. Then the file name was changed by me at the US patent but the wording of Seiko may or may not actually be attached to it soared up? I just did that so I can find it in my files. Normally patents are in people's name if they work for a company the company name will be there you'll notice the person lives in Japan which is interesting as the name would imply that this is a Swiss product. Somewhere I think I have the patents for the stud and I believe that is Swiss like a lot of things their Japanese and Swiss and then the Japanese let the Swiss name stand as it seems you more popular in case as you read up on the patents of the regulator pins or pin will see and it should explain exactly how and why it works also why it's important to always close at an open in specific directions because the pins actually have a shaped to them it's very hard to see the shape as it's very tiny.   As a reminder with this system it's mass-produced. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they use cameras and computers to do all of the adjustments.  The meaning of this is that the majority of watches will function as there supposed to and do what they're supposed to do the system will allow us for some minor in tolerance and has more than likely as I said no human hand is ever touched those watches that's the way they left the factory and they work fine. US2007091729A1 seiko etachron.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...