Jump to content

How does this jewel stay in


Lc130

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I'm a beginner.  This center wheel bridge jewel fell out of the bifora 115/1 in the wash.  Is it just held in place by the wheel that sits on top (third)?  I'm wondering if it was pressed in.

Thank you

Charlie

IMG_4055.JPG.55387c2b7548c2da3da29d21b70357c6.JPG

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

It should be pressed in, friction fit. That it fell out means the fit is too loose, tricky to tighten that hole there but you should try

How would I tighten it?  I have two biforas and ran both bridges through the cleaner and jewels fell out of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy... jeweling is a complete topic or master skill in its own right. I’d say pretty advanced although it is straightforward. 
 

Jeweling tools are common anywhere watchmaking tools and parts are sold. Seitz made great sets. HOWEVER, nowadays there is the one and only Horia tool. This provides you with amazing precision to adjust the level of the jewel within the hole. After all, ENDSHAKE is what makes it breaks how a watch runs and the adjustments need be very precise. 
 

Anyway, the jewel hole is measured and a jewel 0.01mm bigger is chosen. You have to determine what kind of opening the jewel should have as there are several options but once chosen, the horia tool (or any jeweling tool for that matter) will let you friction fit it in place. Then you have to check endshake and adjust accordingly. The precision of the horia tool comes in handy when you have a cracked jewel that is still in position, so you can measure exactly how deep it is and when the replacement is pushed in, it’s left at the exact same height. 

Anyway, it may be that the brand chose slightly smaller jewels than ideal therefore allowing them to come out with the wash. As you may imagine, such loose fit would also allow the jewel to move with a mild impact that the watch would get, throwing things in disarray. 
 

I hope this helps. 
 

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you do decide to buy a jewelling tool and buy a second hand one make sure the press part itself is in good condition, don't be worried if a few reamers or pushers are missing as you can buy replacements for them for reasonable prices, but the press itself is expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just got these good quality diamond files from the bay for Just a fiver, we all love a bargain dont we. Brand names are J.K.Smit  and Triefus, two old diamond tool makers so not cheap crap.
    • Its a touch under ive just remeasured it and added a wrist shot. Unbelievably it was £13  plus 3 postage. You dont find watches that nice for that money every day of the week. Maybe removing the epilame in the oil region improves the purpose of it. We may know very soon as i emailed Episurf 4 hours ago to ask that exact question. 🤞they are happy to provide an answer for us. How do you fancy trying a stearic acid vapour treatment experiment  H .  Shall i have a go this afternoon ? Stearic acid experiment underway,  its started to melt at around  65° C. The idea is to find a large cap jewel to suspend over the vapour release. 
    • That's the size of my grandfather's Ernest Borel watch. Definitely not a lady's watch! 👍
    • Thanks H It does have a big crown for the watch , it could be considered a ladies watch these days i guess, it measures 33mm case 36mm with that large crown 18mm lug space. A tad small for a guy of today, but still very wearable. The photo was deceptive so here it is adorning my 7 1/4 " wrist. It need some love to make it run better. The hair coils are touching so running a bit fast at the moment,  not caused by magnetism, and maybe just a clean and a service. The dtal is in fantastic shape.
    • That's one beautiful timepiece! Love the big crown in proportion to the case. Perhaps a ladies' watch, but I don't think so. I have a "modern Ingersoll" watch, but it has nothing to do with the original brand (Miyota 9015 movement). Interesting synonym for synthetic oils! 😆 There is, of course, a limit to how large a volume of oil epilame can bind and hold in place. If the oleophobic effect is too strong then it can become a problem. I'm not sure where I heard or read it, but as I understand it, the active ingredient in a bottle of epilame is extremely small and more than 99% of the contents of the bottle is just a transfer agent. If the active ingredient becomes too concentrated, which it can become over time, or if the product is of poor quality, the oleophobic effect is amplified. This in turn causes the applied oil to look like a gummed-up ball on the surface of the treated part. If that happens, we know that the active ingredient has become too concentrated. What we want is for the oil to bind but not to the point where it is formed into an excessively round ball on the surface. The highlighted text in the patent that you refer to describes well the problem that can arise with too high a concentration of the active ingredient. However, I would be extremely surprised if the entire amount of oil leaves the treated surface as water on wax would. At present, I am convinced that the analogy between wax and water on the one hand and epilame and oil on the other is incorrect. Epilame is described as binding and that is also my absolute experience. Epilame probably has some repelling effect but that is not its main purpose and that is not how epilame is designed and works. The method of abrading the epilame treatment from the section of the pallet stones coming in contact with the escape wheel teeth seems after even more research to be well established, but if it actually works, if so how and why is beyond what I can currently understand. Perhaps it is just to do and trust that it is based on well-established experience. I am, after all, inclined to think so.
×
×
  • Create New...