Jump to content

Unstable timegraph readings


Lc130

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I'm a beginner.  I ruined a hairspring on an otherwise fine bifora 115/1.  I replaced the balance, cock and all, from a donor (I broke off the curb pin in the original) .  Before the swap, the watch was stable on the time grapher.  Now I get varying readings.  I did demagnetize.

rate. amp, beat error

DU 

74, 250, 1.4

95, 228, 1.4

82, 249, 1.4

DD

70, 235,1.6

80, 250, 1.4

77 259, 1.4

PU 

100, 171, 3.9 

134, 180, 3.7

94, 205, 3.5

PD

-154, 197, 0.7

-73, 192, 0.7

-41, 198, 0.6

Any idea how I should proceed?  

Thank you

Charlie

 

 

 

 

Edited by Lc130
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  The fact that the origional was ok and the only thing changed was the balance complete with the cock would point to some discrepency in the donor balance. There are two ways of solving this  1 strip the donor balance and use the parts to rebuild the origional or    2   the purchase of a balance complete from the supplier of your choice.d

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  The fact that the origional was ok and the only thing changed was the balance complete with the cock would point to some discrepency in the donor balance. There are two ways of solving this  1 strip the donor balance and use the parts to rebuild the origional or    2   the purchase of a balance complete from the supplier of your choice.d

Aren,t hairsprings, balance wheel interchangable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of round balance wheel would cause variation in PU & PD positions. Poise issue is of the same nature.

If balance wheels weigh the same, the good HS + good balance wheel would work (simply interchangable).  In case of  different weight, there is still a chance to vibrate the two.

Have you checked the upper jewel assembly? Combine with excess endshake, they exacrebate the problem.

Best

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Just a thought, did the donor watch work before you used the balance ?. If so put the balance back in the donor and checki it out on the vibrograph  it may have exibited this fault in the donor and you have transfered it to your watch.

Suppose it dose exhibit the same fault, how would this new info help  diagnos the fault or fix it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldnt diagnose the fault but it would prove that the balance assy was exibiting the fault before fitting to the recipient watch therefore a fault was transferred and was inherent in the donor watch before removal and refitting, There is no way of knowing if this was the correct balance that was in the donor in the first place.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, watchweasol said:

It wouldnt diagnose the fault but it would prove that the balance assy was exibiting the fault before fitting to the recipient watch therefore a fault was transferred and was inherent in the donor watch before removal and refitting, There is no way of knowing if this was the correct balance that was in the donor in the first place.

Thanks for the explanation. I see now, it saves us a search in the wrong place. 

Best 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Just a thought, did the donor watch work before you used the balance ?. If so put the balance back in the donor and checki it out on the vibrograph  it may have exibited this fault in the donor and you have transfered it to your watch.

Thank you.  It worked but I only tested the dial up position on the timegrapher before transferring it.  Next week I plan move it back to the donor and test all positions.  

Charlie

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi LC  Thats good. Once thats done and proved either good or faulty we are then in the situation where we have established facts and can move on. Problem with donor watches we have no history, some may have been cobbled together to sell regardless.  In terms a working watch is defined by the fact that the balance swings and it ticks, There may be a multitude of sins in the watch yet to be discovered.  when buying donor watches it is a case of buyer beware (caveat emptor), but we all do it knowing  most of the time it works the odd time it doesnt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
    • Knocked out another 404 last night...when you are in the zone! This watch was a non-runner which I picked up as part of a lot of 8 watches, so works out to be $3.12 per watch. Before:   And the finished watch, new crown and stem and the crystal was cracked so was replaced. I also replaced the mainspring as the original was the old steel type spiral and very 'set' - all else is original: The Movement was a AS 1686, but in reading around a little the ACCRO watch company were sued for their use of the five point crown on their Jacques Pere range as it resembled Rolex, see below: ACCRO then reverted to just ACCRO on their watches - I have done some sniffing around the internet and haven't seen another example of ACCRO and the crown together on a dial so maybe I have something unusual, or maybe I was looking in the wrong places 🙂.  
×
×
  • Create New...