Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, I'm one of the people who made the mistake of mixing up top & bottom endstones. I read in this forum that generally, they are different sizes. Thankfully I did not break the Incabloc springs. 

But I'm curious, what are your experience chatons? Are also different size for top & bottom, or are they usually the same?

systeme_incabloc_small.jpg

Posted

Usually the same, rarely of diferent radius size. I have several ST96 movements of both types, I guess of diferent variants. Jewel thicknesses;  unknown.

I do switch top/ bottom jewels or replace one or both, even move the bottom jewel housing, for the purpose of staff's axial adjustment.

Further, have ground( on fine sandpaper) the endstones flat surface to repair/ reduce the thickness.

Moving the jewel housing beats shimming/gouging. 

 

Posted

Chatons  - some are different, some are not. When cleaning I keep the Balance jewels with the balance and mainplate jewels with the mainplate to avoid mixing them up.

There may be a case where the jewels or chatons have been swapped around, in such cases one cap-jewel will sit loose when the inca spring is 'locked'. This is where you have to sit back and figure out if the parts were swapped around or a part from another watch was used.

Anilv

Posted
38 minutes ago, anilv said:

Chatons  - some are different, some are not. When cleaning I keep the Balance jewels with the balance and mainplate jewels with the mainplate to avoid mixing them up.

There may be a case where the jewels or chatons have been swapped around, in such cases one cap-jewel will sit loose when the inca spring is 'locked'. This is where you have to sit back and figure out if the parts were swapped around or a part from another watch was used.

Anilv

Hi Anvil, How would you compensate for general pivot wear or changes introduced like new staff, fork?

I adjust shock springs tension as well, flip the spring over.   Regards

Posted

Generally a well serviced watch will have negligible wear at the balance pivots. If its worn you have to change.

You can get away with changing the depth of the mainplate jewel to address slightly worn pivots but this can cause other problems like harispring touching the balance cock or balance, the rolller jewel not making proper contact with the pallet fork. Also a worn pivot will usually mark the cap jewel as well as wearing the edges of the pivot (not only the tip) so anything other than replacing a balance staff will be a bodge.

Having said that in my neck of the woods (Malaysia) changing a balance staff and service will set you back USD70-100 (unless a balance can be harvested from another movement) so its not really an option for a USD50 watch. I have guys come in with their fathers watch which they want to keep running for occasional use so its not surprising that they opt for a bodge. As it will see minimal use I usually oblige by cleaning the pivots up and try to get the endshake in spec.

Anilv

  • Thanks 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, anilv said:

Generally a well serviced watch will have negligible wear at the balance pivots. If its worn you have to change.

You can get away with changing the depth of the mainplate jewel to address slightly worn pivots but this can cause other problems like harispring touching the balance cock or balance, the rolller jewel not making proper contact with the pallet fork. Also a worn pivot will usually mark the cap jewel as well as wearing the edges of the pivot (not only the tip) so anything other than replacing a balance staff will be a bodge.

Having said that in my neck of the woods (Malaysia) changing a balance staff and service will set you back USD70-100 (unless a balance can be harvested from another movement) so its not really an option for a USD50 watch. I have guys come in with their fathers watch which they want to keep running for occasional use so its not surprising that they opt for a bodge. As it will see minimal use I usually oblige by cleaning the pivots up and try to get the endshake in spec.

Anilv

By adjusting the staff I mean correcting for any and all problems you mentioned above, like incorrect  pallet- escape teeth contact etc.We don,t always start with a movement in need of just general service but sometimes to repair the cause of the above mentioned especially if parts are unavailable.

Regards

and I havn,t forgotten my promise to suggestion you made two years ago. I will show off my vintage collection in proper section. 

Posted

To do it properly, a worn pivot/parts should be replaced and brought back to spec, with skill and the right tools anything can be re-built but to do it economically is not possible. Hence the bodges exist.

In the example I gave above.. I didn't even bother to put it on a timegrapher.. as long as it ran ok on my wrist for a few days without losing much time and didn't stop when I put it on my bedside table it was good enough.

Anilv

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy. 
    • Yes, the specific old tools do exist, but may be having one is not needed as they are not cheap, and also You will be able to do without it well enough. My advice will be to use regular depthing tool and adjust it for the exact distance between pallet fork and escape wheel bearings from the watch. Then remove the shellac from the pallet that now doesn't pass the ew teeth and move this pallet in. Then put the pallet fork and ew on the depthing tool and check how they lock. They should not lock when the pallet is in, but You will little by little move the pallet out and locking will appear. Then move just an idea out for reliable work and apply shellac, then check if things are still the same. You have to observe where the teeth fall on the pallets - it must be just a little below the edge between impulse and rest planes. Then You must check how everything behaves in the movement This Potence tool is so ingenious, but actually, the traditional way to do the things is much more simple. Arrange the parts not on the pillar plate, but on the cover plate. Only the central wheel will remain on the pillar plate, secured by the cannon pinion.
    • There is a tool that was made for setting up and adjusting escapements of full plate watches.  There were two styles, the picture below shows both of them.  The lower tool held a movement plate and the vertical pointed rods were adjusted to hold the unsupported pivots of the lever and escape wheel.  There was also a version of this tool that had 3 adjustable safety centres so that the balance pivot could be supported by the tool :  The other version I’m aware of is the Boynton’s Escapement Matching and Examining Tool came as a set of two or three clamps that gripped the watch plate and held the safety centres for the pivots : These do turn up on eBay from time to time.  For some escapement work, you can set up the parts in a regular depthing tool, with the centres set according to the distance between the corresponding pivot holes on the movement.  I hope this helps, Mark
    • Once you are aware of the problem, you can adjust as necessary. I have a couple of the Omega 10xx, and they are not my favourites. They seem a bit flimsy and not as solid as previous generation Omega. But I think that's true of a lot of movements from the 70-80s. For me, the 50-60s is the peak in watch movements, where the design criteria was quality, not saving the last penny.
×
×
  • Create New...