Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have installed and completed a custom project watch using an Asian Clone 2824-2 movement. Dial is seated, hands set, timing within +4sec a day face up - fine. On my first test, the date flips at midnight - good job, the hands have been set to align to midnight when the date changes. I give the watch a healthy hand wind and we're off to the races. Each morning, I confirm the time keeping and date. Each morning everything looks good. Until morning 8. That's when I notice the date hasn't changed but the time is correct. I decide to manually change the date by setting the hands, it's changes at 8:00a. 

Strange. I do this again. This time it changes at 9:00a. Then 10:00a. And so on. 

So, the movement is keeping good time. Which to me suggests the hands aren't dragging, right? Because the time would be one hour off. 

So I'm at a loss here. What could be the issue causing a consistently changing date flip, 1 hour later every day? 

Thank for your help! 

  • Like 1
Posted

What a unique problem!!

allow me to venture a guess?

 

time is accurate.

minutes and hour hands are aligned and in sync.   You can set the date but it changes an hour later each day.

Im going to get some terminology wrong here, so please forgive me:

i would look at the day/date reduction wheel.  The one(s) that feed the day/date jumper.  I would guess it is either damages, or, more likely, it’s the wrong component for that movement and is slightly too small for that particular movement’s calendar works.

it the reduction wheel were the wrong diameter or had the wrong number of teeth, it would cause only the date to be affected.  Too large and I THINK the date would turn early.  Too small and an it turns late.  Or vise versa.

 

the only way you can determine this is to look up the specs of the original movement being cloned and see what size, configuration those wheels be.

 

Thats just a guess.

please post when you figure it out?  This one has me intrigued!!!

Posted

New to watches, I would venture a guess.  Since it was behaving as expected for a full 8 days, then started to switch the date incorrectly, would imply something broke, or became misaligned, or loose at day 8. 

Obviously I haven’t a clue, but it’s fun to speculate!

would appreciate and update when you figure it out.

Posted
8 hours ago, bytes2doc said:

 Since it was behaving as expected for a full 8 days, then started to switch the date incorrectly, would imply something broke, or became misaligned, or loose at day 8. 

That's not what the OP wrote. He only noticed the fault on the 8th day, since just then it became evident during daytime.

If the mov`t is of the same low grade as in Mark's video below I think one can expect any kind of design or manufacturing defect. 

 

Posted
On 8/21/2019 at 10:14 AM, ITProDad said:

What a unique problem!!

allow me to venture a guess?

 

time is accurate.

minutes and hour hands are aligned and in sync.   You can set the date but it changes an hour later each day.

Im going to get some terminology wrong here, so please forgive me:

i would look at the day/date reduction wheel.  The one(s) that feed the day/date jumper.  I would guess it is either damages, or, more likely, it’s the wrong component for that movement and is slightly too small for that particular movement’s calendar works.

it the reduction wheel were the wrong diameter or had the wrong number of teeth, it would cause only the date to be affected.  Too large and I THINK the date would turn early.  Too small and an it turns late.  Or vise versa.

 

the only way you can determine this is to look up the specs of the original movement being cloned and see what size, configuration those wheels be.

 

Thats just a guess.

please post when you figure it out?  This one has me intrigued!!!

Thanks! I agree with your hypothesis - I'll get around to testing the theory in a few days when I've got a few new parts to interchange. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

@ITProDad

Frustratingly I cannot say for certain the issue. I disassembled the watch to remove and inspect the hour wheel, intermediate date wheel, and calendar driving wheel. All appeared clean and undamaged under 10x mag. 

Reassembled the movement, installed a generic movement hour hand, and wound. Tested the date change over night and by hand setting the time. It all works fine now. 

Reassembled the watch, retested....it's all working fine. 

My guess is it was dirty or had something causing the teeth to misalign - and that was dislodged when I removed the wheels. 

Case unsatisfying-ly closed. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Do you have a dial washer? If not that can be the cause. Sometimes even without a dial washer and there being enough space between the dial and hour wheel to allow it to disengage, the minute hand will limit the vertical movement of the hour hand/wheel. Maybe you had a situation where it was almost secure but when the hour wheel is under tension arming the date wheel it just makes it to skip a tooth.

  • Like 1


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also still use my cheap first set of screwdrivers. I replaced the blades of the smallest (0.6mm) with higher quality once I had bent a few of the originals, but beyond that I have been fine. Note though that I do not work on any remotely valuable watches and most of what I deal with are in a truly terrible state, watches that have been banging around in kitchen drawers or toolboxes. So my concern for screw head slot integrity and scratches is usually not very high.  As for a loupe - you won't need anything powerful for an ST36 that is new. You don't need to do close inspection of balance pivots because they will not be worn out, and a 3x or 5x loupe is perfectly sufficient to see the oiling. I don't have any microscope or powerful magnification of any sort. I just use cheap loupes. But again this would be different if I were working with more valuable watches. And if I had equipment to burnish pivots, then I would get a microscope to check my work.
    • I've recently switched over to using a x2.5 -x3 eyeglass for disassembly and some larger part assembly. It's interesting to see how accustomed and trained your eyes become to that way of working after using a microscope for years. And pick up and work at eyelevel when possible. Personally I would stick with and learn to use regular oilers efficiently. 
    • I remember playing with asbestos wire insultaion when I was a kid (remember the cool fluffy white stuff?) and I've been breathing fine dust particles in my woodworking shop for years, so I'm probably toast either way, but I don't want any of this radioactive dust anywhere near my kids.
    • Its good to understand how and why demagnetisers work. These two pieces of text explain in basic terms how ferrous metal is affected by magnetism and why they can retain some of those properties.  The cheap demagnetiser is actually a magnetiser,but is used in a way that can remove the weak magnetic properties that a steel has gained through magnetic field exposure.  As steel is drawn further away from the device, the magnetic fields around it become progressively weaker and more -irregular- . This causes the disruption of the atomic and subatomic alignments within the steel that make it magnetised. So also moving the steel  through different orientations as its pulled away could actually improve that process. I still use my first cheap set of drivers, I notice very little difference in the way of feel between them and a set of preowned Bergeon I use, blade quality is more important. Tweezers have more variables, but again they don't have to be expensive to work well. My most used tweezers are my cheapest, but then I never use any pair that I haven't modified in some way. 
×
×
  • Create New...