Jump to content

Erratic seconds hand x2


Recommended Posts

I posted a question a little while back regarding erratic seconds hand, see here

Luckily I managed to find another watch with the exact same movement with a full set of hands and in working order. It arrived and was running, although very sluggish, but the main thing was that the seconds hand moved nice and smoothly so I had something to work with. The first thing I tried was putting the seconds hand on my movement, the jumping and slight hesitation remained. Next step was to begin transferring some parts onto my watch hoping to find the problem. As soon as I removed the bridge I thought, bingo! This must be why my watch is behaving like it does. Underneath the pinion that the seconds hand is mounted to there was a very thin shim, presumably to allow it to turn smoothly.  Here’s a picture

C55B3860-B9C7-4F07-83ED-69C7231A1267.thumb.jpeg.880aaf5dfd1ecfab4a6787561e22d174.jpeg

I fitted the shim along with the pinion,  bridge back on and, still the same. I then swapped the next wheel in the train from the donor, still the same. At this point I assumed that the problem still lay further down the line somewhere in my watch, but just to confirm I put the parts already removed from my movement back into the donor watch. Logically, I thought that would confirm those parts were ok if the donor still ticked ok, it didn’t. Before I went any further I put all the original parts back into the previously nice running donor and now that one is behaving  the same as mine. I have no idea what has happened. I am going back to square one. I have stripped mine back down again, brushed all of the wheels and pinions in case some debris is still lurking between the teeth and at the moment they are soaking in lighter fluid. 

I was watching the hand moving on the donor movement trying to see any clues as to what might be happening. When the hand stutters and sometimes completely stops the watch itself seems unaffected and continues running ok apparently. I was surprised to find that if I actually block the seconds hand, the balance continues to swing and the train can move a little before it stops. So if something is temporarily blocking the train somewhere it’s not enough to stop it, just enough to make the seconds hand jump. I was thinking maybe one of the wheels might have a tight spot or something, I don’t know really. I’m just going to clean it all up again thoroughly, build it up without the pallet or balance, fit the second hand and see how it moves in that state. It just seems odd that I have somehow managed to introduce the same problem onto the other movement. The only other time I have seen a second hand jump like this was on a Seiko 4205, but that is a recognised problem with them. They have a tension spring but it doesn’t always work and it’s something you have to put up with. I’d certainly appreciate any advice.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you remove the seconds arbor, you would find the movement runing fine on wrist and on timegrapher. The culprit and it is a culprit, is: at the  pinion end of the arbor. A shim or tension spring is to keep the pinion in proper contact with the min wheel, improper oiling of the shim-pinion is the likely cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been looking at the shim while the watch is running. It does not touch the pinion at all it is just sitting beneath it. Annoyingly,  I did not observe it’s position before I stripped it out, I did not know it would be there otherwise I would have done. The only way I can see it exerting any tension onto the pinion is if it was shaped like a dial washer and sprung up slightly. Should it be this shape? When it was out it was all a bit wrinkled so I flattened it out. I am wondering what I could use as a replacement, I don’t imagine I will find a dial washer that small. Where to oil and where not to oil then Joe?

Thanks

Edited by Davey57
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Davey  My approach would be to assemble just the pinnion and its adjacent gear/wheel and rolate the wheel with a fine brush feeling for any sticky point if none add the next wheel and repeat untill the cuprit is found, it is possible that you have wheel out of round. I have attached the tech sheets for the 4205.

4616_seiko 4205A.pdf 286_Seiko4205B,4206B,4207B.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Davey, The video wont open. Please give caliber.

Check side shake on the min arbor, you have access to the min wheel ( broken jewel) , if removed/ replaced the min wheel may develope the babbit to slip on its arbor.

Both faces of the pinion gear should be lubed and interface with smooth surfaces (  stone jewel or metal) 

Seconds arbor may rub inside the center tube. Make sure inside of the center tube is clean, Neither seconds arbor look bent, pivot on them may be. 

The tension spring or shim interface should be smooth.

You are right the preveous owner got tired and rid of it.:lol:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I’ll have another go. Need to have a break from it as it has become a bit obsessive trying to get to the bottom of it. Added to which I have managed to break off the top pivot of the seconds pinion, so annoying. Lucky I have the luxury of the spare. At the moment I am at this stage. I have polished up the arbor for the seconds hand in case it was a bit sticky in the tube. I have fitted the centre wheel, seconds arbor and the wheel that drives its pinion. With the bridge on it all spins freely. I have put the second hand back on and tried pushing it round with a thin bristle from a paintbrush. It all seemed well but a couple of times the second hand jumps ahead of the bristle slightly as if it had just released itself. It is assembled dry at the moment and I have not put in the shim as it is now looking more like it would hinder rather than help.

Thanks for the links watchweasol. It’s not a 4205 by the way:)  I only mentioned that as a few I have done previously had the same problem.

Sorry, meant to add that it’s a Pallas movement but I’m not sure of the exact calibre.

Edited by Davey57
More info.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the hole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
    • The description there is exactly how it's done, and it's very well written!
×
×
  • Create New...