Jump to content

7750 Cross threaded setting lever screw


Recommended Posts

Servicing a Chinese 7750 for a friend and one of the screws for the setting lever jumper is cross threaded, preventing me from removing the keyless works? 

Does anyone have any tips on how to remove a cross threaded screw? 

Will I have to tap a new thread if I remove it? The thought of doing that on a tiny thread like this is daunting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are only 2 screws in the setting lever, 1 has been removed the other keeps turning without retracting due to being cross threaded. You can't move the setting lever (plate) until the screws are removed. Not quite understanding what you're saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol must say I was a little bit confused there for a while but now I see the jumper lever actually looks like one from the 7750..
Guess you have to remove the good screw and unscrew the bad one as much as it goes, try to do this with sharp edged pliars.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HSL said:

lol must say I was a little bit confused there for a while but now I see the jumper lever actually looks like one from the 7750..
Guess you have to remove the good screw and unscrew the bad one as much as it goes, try to do this with sharp edged pliars.
 

You and me both haha. I unscrew it and it loosens off a thread or two. At this point i either commit to removing it and grip it with something or screw it back down and tell him his swiss cheese chinese screw is stuck, so i can't clean and lubricate the keyless.

If i do remove it, i risk stripping the thread in the plate. What would be the process, should that occur?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AP1875 said:

screw it back down and tell him his swiss cheese chinese screw is stuck, so i can't clean and lubricate the keyless.

I would think this is the best solution.. ;)  You could lubricate what you reach since there will probably not be non from the begining..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HSL said:

I would think this is the best solution.. ;)  You could lubricate what you reach since there will probably not be non from the begining..

oh ok. From inspection the movement is actually pretty clean but there is no sign of lubrication as you suspect.

Just out of interest, if this was a valuable movement that required a service and someone had cross threaded this screw during the last service. What would you guys do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have doubts that a genuine 7750 would be able to get crossthread, but if it was i would have put in in my lathe and drilled out the screw as long as it had the head left.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HSL said:

I have doubts that a genuine 7750 would be able to get crossthread, but if it was i would have put in in my lathe and drilled out the screw as long as it had the head left.. 

how would you get the screw head in the centre of the lathe? I could try this, we have lots of lathes of different sizes in work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little bit hard to descibe the tool but you attache a pice holder with three adjustable gripers , theese allow you to set a workpiece excentric to the backstock..
Ahh ..a video is better, around 3:35 you can see it in action..

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, HSL said:

A little bit hard to descibe the tool but you attache a pice holder with three adjustable gripers , theese allow you to set a workpiece excentric to the backstock..
Ahh ..a video is better, around 3:35 you can see it in action..

 

Thanks for showing me. Unfortunately I dont have access to that setup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies if you have, but have you tried putting a small stiff strip of metal (or a flat bladed screwdriver) under the setting lever (plate) as close to the cross-threaded screw as you can, and then gently applying a constant pressure to lift the plate upwards, as you turn the screw to unscrew it?

I've often found that re-engages the screw and thread and allows the former to be removed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to remove the screw and the cover plate, just to gain access to the keyless.

If this was an expensive piece expected to tic for a generation or two, one would think of repeatability in cover removal, only then repair of the crossed thread makes sense, repair lathe work etc costs more than a new clone movement.

If you must access the set mech, remove the screw not marked in the pic, this will let turning the cover plate about the bad screw just so to get it out of the way and let you access the keyless, @2131tom explains how.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like stripped rather than crossthreaded. You can try sticking a needle or something in the same screw hole from the other side of the plate and apply pressure to the bottom of the screw as you unscrew.

5 hours ago, HSL said:

I have doubts that a genuine 7750 would be able to get crossthread, but if it was i would have put in in my lathe and drilled out the screw as long as it had the head left.. 

Genuine ETA's aren't immune to defects. I had one 7750 that came with hairspring that had like a 10 degree slant, and another one with a loose screw bushing for the chrono seconds brake. Both were brand new genuine ETA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
    • A Schild movements often have left handed crown screws. A pic of the keyless works would help identify it, and the size of the movement. Looks like someone has had a, not very subtle, attempt to decrease play in the centre wheel. And the hairspring looks like it needs some work. From the scratches on the bridges, it looks like it was last serviced by a drunken baboon, but it's a good movement to practice on. Good luck 
×
×
  • Create New...