Jump to content

Aerowatch Neuchatel conversion...


Recommended Posts

Hi to you all....i am getting married in September and i have decide to buy a watch that will fit my suit :)...i have found a few over size watches and i just fell in love whit them. I am 1.96 m tall and small watches just dont fit my hand wrist.At this moment i have Invicta Corduba  model.3449 and trust me its like a wrist clock not wrist watch. I have using that watch evry day and now i just cant imagine my self whit small watch on my wrist.

 Those watches i mention above...i have realise that they are pocket watch conversions made in Ukraine. 1000 for and 1000 against....i am 1001 for :)...but also i have realise that they place price to much for old pocket watches whit some not original dials and Parnis watch cases. Sooooooooooooooooooo i have decide to make my own pocket watch conversion. I have found a nice Aero watch Neuchatel pocket watch whit beautifull dial, and it is moving whit UNITAS 6498 movment whic is in prestige condition. I know that UNITAS 6498 doesnt have shock resistance (its not INCABLOCK version) but i will not not wear that watch evry day. It will be more like memory for me...

 

After all i wrrite here is my problem....i have order Parnis watch case 45 mm square case and i somebody tell me that this case will not fit because its made for 0.8 mm dials and my dial is 0.4 mm. 

Is that possible??? My dial diameter is 36,5 and its said on advertise that this case will fit any 6497 6498 st 36 movment and 35-37 mm dial. They didnt mention dial thicknes. And some other guy told me that most important thing is that i have to make shim 0.4 to insert beatween dial and movment so it will fit this case...is taht possible? will i have that problem or what?Pls help...

 

 

This is the case i order....https://www.ebay.com/itm/45mm-Square-Watch-Case-for-UNITAS-ETA-6497-6498-ST36-Movevement-Wristwatch/202507526147?hash=item2f2663a003:m:mHbKrPFx7xBQ3ECUAhCTscg

52594298_2041927562591039_2163256378523648000_n.jpg

Untitled.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello

It sounds like a cool little project you got going on here.
I'm not very familiar with these Parnis cases but the theory is the same for the most.
The pocket watch movements are mostly put into place by opening the front lid and dropped into place, this means it doesn't matter which thickness you got on the dial since the distance to the winding stem center and the tube in the case will be adjusted by the backside of the dial.
But on wristwatches the movement is most likely placed from the bottom and against an edge inside the case, now the position of the center of the stem is decided by the fromt of the dial. If the dial is supposed to be 0.8 mm thick but instead is 0.4 mm the center of the stem will be 0.8 - 0.4 = 0.4 mm off towards the center of the tube in the case.
If this offset matters or not is depending of the clearance in the tube. One  always should strive for perfection so the easy fix is to put a shim under the dial.If you can't find a factory made shim you can always buy a sparkplugg gap measuring tool from the local gasstation for 1$ or two and use the 0.4 mm blade for your shims.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are built on Slavic battle Chassis. No small watches for you.You could use something soft and easy to work and less likely to corrode ,brass or plastic.Stainless (inox as you call it) is hard to cut and has nasty sharp edges. Congratulations on your upcoming marriage.

Edited by yankeedog
content
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upssss i bought abother one :)....this one is whit inca block....its eta 6498-1 movement and not so good condition as my watch maker told me...it was used heavely...it was used like every day watch...its works fine but it happend that he stop two times...what could be problem..and here is one picture what am i usjng like evry day watch and pocket watch :))just to se the scale :))676bc5161dc3489b42c9a7241a6972cd.jpg639b3ca0e74d787388738d09f454ca4b.jpg0d02021fdd20f0756782e3a694d7205a.jpg4bb0cf557dde10eae89e97e168976ad3.jpg

Послато са GT-I9301I уз помоћ Тапатока

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Still i didnt place movement holders into case. Waiting them to arrive from Malasiya. But so far this is how it look like. I have trim the winding steam..hand made leather strap 28 mm on watch and 26 mm on buckle. Overall looknice :)b8998ab478e274a0db210a80399e52c8.jpg1e84d74e051f3028598331472e9866ee.jpgbef663356417d6db5e2d760ef0733981.jpg9abdac89dab345fb8424285f30694d07.jpg

Послато са SM-J600FN уз помоћ Тапатока

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
is it the picture, or is there a slight dial misalignment
Yes it is and it doesnt fit case that i bought...on advertise it said that will fit 40-41.5 mm dial. My dial is 40 mm and it drop down the case. I have bought this dial from e bay down on the picture but now i have dilema will this dial fit my movement.my movement is 6498-1 and this dial is 6498. Are they compactibile? Will it fit???75d133d30eb391e4cf191fcd183bd911.jpg05f6ac45949e87260f75c4976c2a497a.jpg

Послато са SM-J600FN уз помоћ Тапатока

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best answer is probably. Your movement is a 6498-1. This means it has some revision over the standard 6498. I do not know what the revision is.  Probably it is nothing major such as changing the dial feet position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best answer is probably. Your movement is a 6498-1. This means it has some revision over the standard 6498. I do not know what the revision is.  Probably it is nothing major such as changing the dial feet position. 
It will fit :)))

Послато са SM-J600FN уз помоћ Тапатока

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...