Jump to content

A Marvin For Christmas


WillFly

Recommended Posts

I've been looking out for something special for my Christmas present this year. And I thought to myself, "I wouldn't mind a wrist watch for a change..." :D

So I'm about to acquire this lovely Marvin military style model - complete with original Marvin Bonklip strap. Probably 1950s - brilliant condition and a lovely cal. 520 movement. But when it arrives (sob) it has to be put away!

 

post-64-0-57506600-1416333458_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-26335000-1416333464_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-11968000-1416333486_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice watch Will, I love the fact that it comes with a bonklip strap of which I'm a fan. I have a Seiko military style dial fitted with one and I simply love it. The down side is, in my case, I have to be careful when I wear it...it feels it can open at any time although I'm sure it is simply me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Marvin arrived this morning and has been duly drooled over. I'm allowed to wear it for today - then it has to be locked away in a secret vault deep in a dark cave at the bottom of a vast mine in a faraway country. In other words, somewhere in one of the drawers in madame's bedside cabinet. Fresh pics below - and click the link for a spot of Marvin from 2011... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vnY6m8HM0E

 

post-64-0-35230000-1416482718_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-57498600-1416482722_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great watch! I had my eye on that one too! Almost identical to mine but in better shape. I have managed to polish the scratches out of the crystal for now. i don't wear mine everyday either. I will say this the winding mechanism on mine is like silk. It has such a smooth wind! 

Great purchase! You will be very happy! Congrats!

 

http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/877-my-timekeeping/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will,

I very may have borrowed your phrase "winds like silk" as I cannot think of a better description more befitting. I do wonder the difference. It is considerable. My Illinois pocket watch is pretty smooth as well. Craftsmanship, I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...