Jump to content

Ebay Long Case clock


JimmyD

Recommended Posts

This one should be up OH's street, the seller has 2 Long Case clocksand I have issues with both, have a look and see what you think.

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/ANTIQUE-GEORGIAN-OAK-LONGCASE-GRANDFATHER-CLOCK-BY-RICHARD-BODY-of-BATH-C1770/233124124560?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/ANTIQUE-GEORGIAN-LONGCASE-GRANDFATHER-CLOCK-WILLIAM-STEVENS-CIRENCESTER-C1780/233109713135?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/ANTIQUE-GEORGIAN-OAK-LONGCASE-GRANDFATHER-CLOCK-BY-RICHARD-BODY-of-BATH-C1770/233124124560?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649

Go to the page you want to insert highlight the address and select copy and then come back to the dialogue box you are typing in and click paste, it should insert the link as above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just copy and paste the link from my browser.

I just had a quick look and the gong is the first give away. Longcase clocks that had gongs are very late in Longcase clock history.

The second one if that has been cleaned I would like to know in which decade.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1st one, have a look at the photo with the top door open, the dial has gaps under the arch, and look at the distance of the wood surround, the sides are neat however the arch has been cut to suit the dial at some time and a very bad job it is, therefore I would say a marriage. OH, I agree that the gong is a later addition, also if it was cleaned they forgot to clean the rust off the click lever. Also they did not have a photo of the movement from the hammer side, I wonder why...

The 2nd one, look at the angle of the cog that releases the hammer leaver on the front plate , and as OH said it has not been cleaned for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the first clock is it also possible that the strike silent feature has been added at a later date, the script on the strike silent chapter ring is at odds with a Georgian clock it looks very plain and modern for Georgian engraving there has been no attempt at producing a fancy script, it is certainly not finely produced, I assume the clock would have had a bell at the start of its life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first clock. 1770 is correct for the complete dial this includes the hands. The movement is also correct, but has been altered to accommodate striking on a gong. Longcase clocks with gong striking only appeared in the middle to late 1800’s.

The case is very good it is well proportioned and the style fits perfectly for around the 1770 period. Because of the lack of photos for the case, I’m not convinced about what has already been said. My personal feelings are that the cheeks have been cut or replaced at a lower size to the original; this will cause the gaps around the dial. The wooden arch has been repaired, you can see where it has been glued back, and this would have been repaired probably a hundred odd years ago and is perfectly acceptable.  It is well over priced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the case from a cabinet makers view, The 1st photo shows the door with an addition to the bottom rail, this was done to get the dial set even around said door, the top inside of the arch of the door has been shaved away somewhat to accommodate the same. Photo 4, the frame around the dial has had the bottom cut so that it would not show when the door is closed (even after the addition to the bottom rail of the door) , then the top of the arch has had to be cut away as this would have been showing when the door was closed. There is no way the cabinet maker would not have had the frame width even all the way round and the door width even all the way round, for me this is a movement that did not start life with this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for taking a long time to answer you. I tried to message the seller; he has put in place a restriction. People cannot contact him. I wonder why:D.

 

I have copied two pictures and marked, are these what and where you are referring too.

Sorry If I gave you, the impression that I did not think it was a marriage, I was just pointing out what can happen to a case to give the appearance that the movement does not look as it fits the case. Even the change of a seat board if not the right thickness can add to this appearance, the same with the cheaks. I agree it is a marriage, but the case is of that period so is the dial and movement apart from the alteration of adding a different hammer and the gong. The gong is the big give away. There for this movement was altered around 1880 and upwards.

Door.jpg

Hood.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi OH, Yes that is what I see as an addition to the door at the bottom rail along with the arch being shaved thinner on the inside at the top. The inner frame where you have the oval has had a little taken off the bottom, also the inside of the arch, it has been cut so that it is not seen when the door is closed.

I was going to email the seller myself, then after thinking about it and seeing the other stuff he is selling and all the rubbish he is saying about it I thought, what is the point, he has no integrity.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yes I noticed the new site and I miss the old site. It's the unfortunate problem of the Internet here today gone tomorrow sometimes some of the stuff gets backed up and sometimes well it does not then the problem with the early Seiko's were there were not necessarily designed for distribution across the planet and as such there is no customer support for them. So trying to find early stuff like technical information or sometimes even parts list for older Seiko is is problematic. But I did find you a you tube video. A quick look he seems to take a heck of a lot of time to actually get to the service single I did not watch all that but it does look like he did disassemble or started to say there's a tiny bit here  
    • RichardHarris123: Hello and welcome from Leeds, England.  I have family all over Australia, went as £10 poms Thanks Richard. Hope you’re able to visit your family here and that they’ve all done well 🙂 My relatives arrived from England in the 1790s transported on the ‘Second & Third Fleets’—a story of timber sailing ships, of convicts and doing well in this huge Country of Australia. When I visited the UK in the 1980s, I was too young to comprehend the depth and breadth of its history…  Best wishes, Mike William Chapman, my 4th great Grandad’s charges, at age 23 read at the Old Bailey; sentenced to 7 years of transportation to Sydney.
    • The whole process and the progress are closely observed, it's hand-driven and very controlled. I can't see the "danger", unless you are watching the TV while doing it. As you could have read, and in this quote "wheel" is the balance-wheel.
    • Have you got the pallet fork installed in the movement when you see the train move when using the setting works? As nevenbekriev said, without the pallet fork to lock the train, the behaviour you are describing is normal. If this is happening with the pallet fork installed, you have a problem in the gear train, it should be immobile when the pallet fork is locking the escape wheel.  The fit of the circlip above the pinions on that wheel is crooked in your pictures, it should sit flat up against the upper pinion as in Marc’s picture.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
×
×
  • Create New...