Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It is labeled "Tourist" automatic on the dial. The rear cover says only Swiss made, Incabloc and 25 jewels. It's in rough condition but I would like to identify the likely movement if at all possible prior to deciding whether or not to purchase. It might make a great restoration project. Then again, it might make an interesting paper weight.

Tourist.jpg

Posted (edited)

Well if you want to ID the movement, then you will need to take the back off and take some pictures of it.

BTW the major issue with that watch appears to be the crystal. Polish it up and it will look 100% more presentable. Replace it, if the scratches are too deep, or it is cracked. A new crystal probably wont cost much, but it makes a huge difference.

Also loose that strap and put it on a good looking leather  band. Black leather with contrasting stitching maybe, but the choice is up to you. The difference that makes will also be well worth the effort.

It is an automatic with date, (although I can't verify that from the poor picture, and would need to see inside to be sure), so that makes it a little more interesting, and it is jeweled, so it should feature a reasonably well made movement, but without taking the back off, there could be literally anything lurking inside, from a beautiful movement to a lump of play dough.

Once you know what is inside, then you can judge what it is worth. I would assume it has not been serviced recently, so you will need to do that too.

As to what it is worth, well generally we don't speculate on that here, but it probably isn't hugely valuable, so it is worth whatever you are willing to pay for it.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted

Thank you for the info and link. I've been offered the watch by post so I haven't seen it. Likely I'll purchase it as the price isn't all that much. It's an obscure name but from all I can find out via your link as well as my own research is that it likely has a sourced Swiss movement that is well worth repairing. You're absolutely correct in that a new crystal, strap and TLC will make a likely fine daily wearer out of this "pigs ear". I'll post full pics inside and out if I decide to buy it.

Posted

Just because it's a brand X watch doesn't mean its a brand X movement.. but the 25 jewel claim is what gives me cause to wonder.My bet is that it is a generic 17 jewel AS movement.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ah, well there is the rub. I ordered a post and oscillating weight, but clicked on the wrong thing when adding the weight to the basket adding an automatic bridge. Ordered a weight, and it's somewhere in the ether after our customs and excise folks rejected it because of the documentation.  Yes, both springs inserted the same. "Is the idler gear ok", and here's why I posted to the newbie area: So, reading between the lines, and again correct me if I'm wrong here, the automatic winding mechanism will have an ideler gear, along with the reverse wheels, that prevents over-winding? There is nothing (that I'm aware of) between the crown pinion, crown wheel, and the ratchet wheels to prevent over-winding other than the mainsprings slipping in the barrels.  This is only the second automatic I've worked on. The other, a Vostok, had a very obvious mechanism.  I shall look at the automatic winding mechanism in a bit more detail when I've a bit more time. At the moment I'm taking a glance here now and then when work is dragging 😉 As ever, thank you for your help. Always appreciated.  
    • If the weight was worn how does the post look as normally you'd have to replace both. There should be no real resistance at the end and just be able to keep on winding. Did you insert both springs the same and is the idler gear OK.
    • Assembled and running well, I'm asking after the fact. I'm waiting on a new oscillating weight as this one was worn (they have a reputation for it apparently, no bearings). So I've been winding it by hand, but meeting quite a bit of resistance at the end, more than I think an automatic weight will overcome. It's not quite as sudden as a manual mechanism, but there's very little in it, certainly enough that I would be concerned about breaking something if I continued.
    • Remove the cannon pinion from the dial side first. The "clip" you describe is sort of a metal tab some American companies designed their cannon pinions with in order to make it easier to tighten friction. If that is the problem, the solution is as simple as gently squeezing the tab with tweezers to bend it ever so slightly inward, while supporting the inside of the cannon pinion if possible (it may be harder to support inside since it does not have an open tip as a hollow tube) The cannon pinion should just pull straight off of the arbor on the dial side if you pull it straight up with tweezers. There's no jewel in danger of breaking and the arbor is thick so there isn't much risk of breaking the arbor. But when you are describing that the center wheel's pinion is not turning the arbor, is the pinion firmly attached to the center wheel? If you remove the center wheel and hold onto the rim of the wheel, does the pinion turn independently of the rest of the wheel? It should not.  I'm not sure if this was the case on older Waltham, but the pinion may be threaded onto the center wheel arbor and they are often loose. This was a safety mechanism for a broken mainspring and may just need to be tightened back down. I can't remember for sure, but these might be a reverse (left) thread instead of normal right. And does the entire arbor turn independently of the wheel? Also should not.
    • You may get some extra friction on the barrel lid so may not slip as easy but I wouldn't think it's a problem. My suggestion would be to finish the assembly and see how it runs.
×
×
  • Create New...