Jump to content

Date quickset not working


chrisdt

Recommended Posts

This is an AS 1911 which according to Ranftt should have date quickset. The stem does move though 3 positions but they are right in...wind...second position...wind...right out...hand change. So before I dismantle completely...Anyone have any ideas what might be missing or broken. I don't actually know how the quickset mechanism works so any help would be appreciated.

P1010019.JPG

P1010018.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Chris ,  Dr ranfft says quickset by repeated pushing on the crown.

I have several watches of this type including a longine, seem to me all them push crown quickests can do is to malfunction. See of the one you got actually sets date by pushing on its crown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see any parts that should make a quickset. Some of this AS movements have a function so you can wind the hands between 21and 24 and change the date. 

Are you sure that movement is correct? The bridges has different color and finish. The trainwheel bridge says 21 jewels. 1911 is a 17 jewels movement. Looks a little franken to me. 

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1911 came in a 21 jewel version too, there are of course small changes made depending on the watchmaker receiving the watch, like the color and so on, the bridge seems ok think it's just the angle of the photo. Guess the most look at RANFFT when searching for an answer on their quest of which movement they have and in this case it says just 17 jewels but the picture is a later one with 21 jewels ;)

In this case i would to start looking for parts on the floor since a quick look on the date part shows a spring with no function on the top part of the movement ....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The date jumper comes on where you have the spring by itself , took the time to pick a watch apart so you can see how it should be put in place. By the looks this watch needed a cleaning anyhow.
Below one can see the different variants of the same movement..

AS_Part.jpg

Siblings.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...