Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone!  So I found this guy lying in the bottom of a pile of parts watches and was wonder if someone could help me identify it?  I would like to dive in and fix it up but I have a bit of a concern when it comes to the possibility of radium dials.  I see so see what looks like luminous dots at the hour indicators but I don’t know what it is.  Any thoughts would be great!  Thanks!

DC0DD3E2-8875-492C-BCA8-6DB3063D264C.jpeg

image.jpg

Posted (edited)

Assuming you don't have a geiger counter, then the next best thing is a UV torch (the sort of thing used to check bank notes).

Shine it on the dial, while sitting in a darkened room, and if there is any phosphorescent material on the dial (zinc sulphide generally), then it will glow. This of course doesn't tell you exactly what the luminous paint is, but you can make an educated guess from the age of the watch, and the info here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_paint#radioluminescent_paint
 

The zinc sulphide degrades over time, so even if the watch doesn't appear to have active lume, this doesn't mean it isn't mildly radioactive.

I don't think these things actually present a significant radiolgical hazard, so long as you treat them with the same caution you would if handling any other hazardous material. Wear nitryl gloves, avoid breathing in any dust from the watch, wash your hands afterwards and you should be fine. Once the case and crystal are back on, the amount of radiation they emit is so small as to be almost unmeasurable, since it is mainly alpha radiation, which would be stopped by a thin piece of paper. You probably encounter similar levels of radioactive material of one sort or another daily anyway, especially if you live in an area where there is granite in the rocks, or you have granite work surfaces.

See here->  https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10086-radon-hazards-of-luminous-timepieces/?tab=comments#comment-91769

.. for a more in depth discussion of luminous dials.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Posted

Don’t worry about radium dials. I used to handle them for years and I have not grown two heads. This is just one you have found. You need to remove the hands and dial and take a good clear photo of the keyless work. That is the way to I D watch movements.

Posted

@oldhippy is of course completely correct and normally the keyless works are what is necessary to accurately identify a movement. In this case however enlarging the picture there's a '20' on the barrel bridge which puts it at this model: http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Girard-Perregaux_20

You might therefore also be interested in this: https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?419737-Resurrecting-a-Girard-Perregaux

  • Like 1
Posted

in 1978,  I graduated collage of Nuclear power Engineering. Girard perregaux dials weren,t so scary back then, eversince though I have come to realize, I don,t know what Girard perregaux didn,t know eiher.    :lol: 

 

Posted

Way back in the day , the ladies who painted radium dials had all sorts of health problems.They would sharpen the point of their brush by putting it in their mouth. As a precaution, wear gloves, wash hands and do not lick the dial.

Posted
1 hour ago, yankeedog said:

Way back in the day , the ladies who painted radium dials had all sorts of health problems.They would sharpen the point of their brush by putting it in their mouth. As a precaution, wear gloves, wash hands and do not lick the dial.

.. and even if you do decide to lick it, I think you are more likely to get Delhi belly from licking the dial than any radiation effects.... but don't... not even if you are sorely tempted to find out what it tastes of. 

You should wear gloves or finger cots anyway when removing any dial, or handling the mechanism as it stops you from putting nasty corrosive fingermarks on them. You may not notice them initially, but once they have been on there for a few weeks, those greasy sweaty paw prints can destroy the dial and set up corrosion on metal parts.
 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Sorry for the delayed response everyone!  Thanks so much for all the information!!  Haha yankeedog and andyhull, I will do my best to resist the urge to lick the dial.  I have made it habit to use finger cots at all times when taking down or assembling a watch. I will maybe add a mask when dealing with potential radium dials to be on the safe side.  So as far as cleaning the movement, is there any precautions needed there as far as pre cleaning any potential radium dust from the dial, I don’t really want anything like that in my cleaning solutions, or am I being to paranoid?



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Andy, thank you again for all your help. You are a true gent. I removed the winding stem in order to pop it into the case so I could play with the movement more easily while the dial and hands were still in place, but it appears the setting lever spring has sprung. So, unfortunately I need to address that before looking at anything else.  If I might be so bold: I presume (given I know what everything else is) that the 3930 is the power rating? How do you know what a suitable rating is for a watch, how do you know 3591 (assuming that's the power) is correct for the Slava 2427? I just know it's 1.5 mm wide, 0.06mm thick (assuming my measurements were correct) and fits in a 7.0mm barrel. The magic art of knowing whether a thicker or less wide spring would be suitable is eluding me, the maths didn't turn out as I thought they would. Again, thank your for all your help thus far. 
    • I've found with Russian watches they don't stick to the Swiss numbering system. The problem with the mainspring is that as this is a dual barrel system they're very small compared to most automatics. If you look on Cousins the weakest 1.45mm high spring is 0.085mm which could be too powerful for this movement and is also designed for a 7.5mm barrel. If you then look at the GR Catalogue and work back from the GR3930X, this is the first auto with correct power rating. Although you'd probably have to go back further to this one to make sure it fits.    
    • Hi all, I’m currently working on an ETA 2836-2 movement. I replaced the pallet fork with a new one (ETA2801710, sourced from CousinsUK). After full reassembly and lubrication, I’ve encountered a strange issue: The movement is fully wound and has power. When I fit the balance assembly, the movement does not tick at all—completely dead. When I remove the balance, the gear train suddenly releases and spins freely, indicating power was present. The pallet fork just “floats” without snapping side to side—almost as if it isn’t even there. No interaction with the escape wheel is visible at that point. However: Before fitting the balance, I checked the pallet fork manually — it was working as it should, clearly interacting with the escape wheel. I’ve inspected the pallet bridge jewel (where the pallet fork sits) and everything looks normal. No signs of misalignment or obstruction. I’ve rechecked everything I can think of and I’m completely out of ideas. Has anyone seen this behaviour before? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! TT
    • Thanks for the prompt response. I apologise for not stating the issue more clearly. The problem is that - what I now know I should have called - the centre wheel is not being turned by the pinion (which is driven by the barrel) with which it shares the arbour (1st photo above). The pinion & arbour are indeed reverse threaded but the arbour (the 'screw') is clearly damaged ('rounded' rather than 'sharp' threads) with swarf evident. When the pinion is screwed on there is only enough connection to prevent the pinion being lifted off but not enough to stop it turning on the arbour. Is a (reversible) repair (threadlocker?) possible in the short term while a replacement centre wheel assembly is sought so that the viability otherwise of the watch can be established?
    • Sorry this is a bit late but how did it go for you?   I'm working on a 561 with a similar issue. Cheers, Martin
×
×
  • Create New...