Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So recently acquired a 1601 stainless steel datejust at a reasonable price and the watch is in working order and is currently keeping good time but there are a few things wrong and I’m not sure how big/small they actually are...firstly when unwinding the crown and attempting to manually wind it fills rather gritty and doesn’t fill like and tension builds up while winding??? Secondly when trying to pull out the crown to the second position as if you were wanting to change the date it fills like it can’t lock it’s self in place and jumps straight to the time changing position and even when you do manage to get it into position upon winding there’s no change to the Callander wheel....and lastly when changing the time the hands seem to collide a little bit only when turning anti clock wise, I know a service will be due but I just wanted to some of the thoughts from a few other members and if anyone could possibly have an idea of what it might be and how much it could potentially end up costing

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

As far as I am aware, the 1601 is a non-quickset watch, meaning there is no date-change setting. You have to go all the way around in time-setting mode to advance the date. Sorry.

The “gritty” winding could be any number of things (dried oil, worn gears, etc).

The hands may have been misaligned during a previous service. If they truly are rubbing you’d see marks in the lower hands where the upper ones have rubbed. Do you see any such marks?

Posted

A slight twist or misalignment of one of the hands might account for them catching in one direction, but apparently not the other. Careful inspection under good magnification should clarify what that issue is. 

Posted

If wound( say a day on wrist) then palced on bench ( static position)  how long would it run?  This gives an idea of the actual power reserve, therefore the mainspring issues, broken, weak etc.

Hands colliding on return can be due to hour wheel not secured down in place add those to stem issues, I wounder if a movement was assembled by this guy:sword:  with parts supplied by this one:judge:.

 

 

Posted

Thanks for the reply’s guys and yes a 1601 shouldn’t have a quickset date function you’re exactly right (next time il think before I speak) haha well I’ve spoken to a little watch store in the city where I live and I’m gonna pop it in there Saturday and let them take good care of it, I initially spoke with an authorised Rolex dealer and they quoted me silly money and told me I would have to probably replace my bracelet on the watch which I find rather funny but what do I know, I would much prefer to give my money to an independent that somewhere like that and that’s not to say I have anything against them but it’s just fills right to me, anyway I’m rabbiting on now but once again thanks for the replies it much appreciated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted



Thanks for the reply’s guys and yes a 1601 shouldn’t have a quickset date function you’re exactly right (next time il think before I speak) haha well I’ve spoken to a little watch store in the city where I live and I’m gonna pop it in there Saturday and let them take good care of it, I initially spoke with an authorised Rolex dealer and they quoted me silly money and told me I would have to probably replace my bracelet on the watch which I find rather funny but what do I know, I would much prefer to give my money to an independent that somewhere like that and that’s not to say I have anything against them but it’s just fills right to me, anyway I’m rabbiting on now but once again thanks for the replies it much appreciated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You lucky guy ...

Firstly as you own a 1601 [emoji7] (one of the most simply elegant Rolex model in my opinion) with those nice pie-pan dials

Secondly because you didn't contracted with a Rolex authorized dealer [emoji6]
Not that I want to throw stones to ADs but they definitely ask silly money for service plus they push people to change parts even when there's no need.
A friend of mine let her 40 years old full gold DJ to an AD for service and guess what ... they sold her a service dial !!! and of course did not give the original back to her.

So let that little watch store take care of your 1601 if they can do ... if you're lucky enough you'll discover that your movement is a hacking 1575, a real workhorse if properly serviced.

And never ever change your dial and bracelet (or any else part).
Pie-pan dials often age nicely and that aging "tells history".
Bracelets sometimes get too much stretch but they can be repaired ... or else you still can use a nice leather strap and keep your bracelet safe.

Envoyé de mon Moto G (5) Plus en utilisant Tapatalk

Posted
7 hours ago, sweeney90 said:

Thanks for the reply’s guys and yes a 1601 shouldn’t have a quickset date function you’re exactly right (next time il think before I speak) haha well I’ve spoken to a little watch store in the city where I live and I’m gonna pop it in there Saturday and let them take good care of it, I initially spoke with an authorised Rolex dealer and they quoted me silly money and told me I would have to probably replace my bracelet on the watch which I find rather funny but what do I know, I would much prefer to give my money to an independent that somewhere like that and that’s not to say I have anything against them but it’s just fills right to me, anyway I’m rabbiting on now but once again thanks for the replies it much appreciated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Much like the story manodeoro warned you of  :judge:  ocasionally borrowing parts off of your watch is commonplace on my side of the globe to the point the owner often stands next to :judge:  to make sure. Parts for this piece = Rolex prestige  Good luck pal.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...