Jump to content

We have another clock competition.


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

The backcock seems to have been altered in some way it has a different coloured brass dove tailed into the top, so has it been converted to a suspension pendulum rather than having the pendulum directley fitted to the staff. The movement has been propped forward at an angle is this an attempt to stop the verge from moving and disengaging from the crown wheel due to wear ?

Also why have the fusee arbours got holes drilled in the middle ?

I also note that this is not the first time the seller has tried to sell this clock it was originally listed in September but was complete with movement brackets which have since been removed.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/282023666266

I should have said barrel arbours not fusee arbours that have holes in

Edited by wls1971
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of what I spotted and a lot I didn't spot has already been mentioned, but clearly its a marriage of the movement to the dial and case, which explains the horrible hacking up of the baseboard to provide the clearance for the pendulum

I also cant decide if the hour and minute hand are a set, or mismatched.

I would of thought this dial should be silvered too, but it looks to be just brass.

Certainly not worth the asking price

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we have is a verge-striking movement with a completely different replacement pendulum. You do not have a suspension spring with an original verge escapement. Many original verge escapements will only have one pivot which goes into the inside plate, the other end will be a V shape that sits in the back cock. That cock has be altered; the brass is a different colour, as so rightly pointed out. It would have had the V end, it has been changed to a pivot end, that is why a part has been added and the whole pitch to the castle wheel has changed. You have to be extremely careful when moving such a clock. You must tilt it into yourself to prevent the V shape from lifting. Some have a cover to prevent such a thing happening, it is very important to check first. I suspect that the movement and dial is a marriage to that case. There is nothing to hold that movement in place to that case. The reason it is tilted, if you look carefully that piece of odd wood isn’t even the width of the movement. The hands are correct but the hour looks a little heavy. The hook is still there to attach the original verge pendulum. The pendulum is a bodge up from top to bottom. Have you noticed the poor re-bushing for the fusee cone on the strike side? It stands out like a sore thumb.  

I think I have covered everything.

 

Everyone who has remarked about the clock has got some points right. :Bravo:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am a new member, therefore did not see this when listed, however can I add three things to the list. The right side screw in the backcock is a replacement and the hammer looks to be set halfway through the strike and the foot looking at the case from the back is also a replacement and a poor one at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...