Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The movement is wonky in the case and badly supported, the suspension spring is bent, there are empty holes in the backplate, the gong hammer looks like a school metalwork project gone wrong, probably some other things that I can’t see as the pictures are too small... as is the movement for that case.

Posted (edited)

The backcock seems to have been altered in some way it has a different coloured brass dove tailed into the top, so has it been converted to a suspension pendulum rather than having the pendulum directley fitted to the staff. The movement has been propped forward at an angle is this an attempt to stop the verge from moving and disengaging from the crown wheel due to wear ?

Also why have the fusee arbours got holes drilled in the middle ?

I also note that this is not the first time the seller has tried to sell this clock it was originally listed in September but was complete with movement brackets which have since been removed.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/282023666266

I should have said barrel arbours not fusee arbours that have holes in

Edited by wls1971
Posted

It looks like the movement has been tilted forward so it fits with the dial. Apart from the escape not running level it must be the wrong movement for the case.

Posted

Most of what I spotted and a lot I didn't spot has already been mentioned, but clearly its a marriage of the movement to the dial and case, which explains the horrible hacking up of the baseboard to provide the clearance for the pendulum

I also cant decide if the hour and minute hand are a set, or mismatched.

I would of thought this dial should be silvered too, but it looks to be just brass.

Certainly not worth the asking price

Posted

What we have is a verge-striking movement with a completely different replacement pendulum. You do not have a suspension spring with an original verge escapement. Many original verge escapements will only have one pivot which goes into the inside plate, the other end will be a V shape that sits in the back cock. That cock has be altered; the brass is a different colour, as so rightly pointed out. It would have had the V end, it has been changed to a pivot end, that is why a part has been added and the whole pitch to the castle wheel has changed. You have to be extremely careful when moving such a clock. You must tilt it into yourself to prevent the V shape from lifting. Some have a cover to prevent such a thing happening, it is very important to check first. I suspect that the movement and dial is a marriage to that case. There is nothing to hold that movement in place to that case. The reason it is tilted, if you look carefully that piece of odd wood isn’t even the width of the movement. The hands are correct but the hour looks a little heavy. The hook is still there to attach the original verge pendulum. The pendulum is a bodge up from top to bottom. Have you noticed the poor re-bushing for the fusee cone on the strike side? It stands out like a sore thumb.  

I think I have covered everything.

 

Everyone who has remarked about the clock has got some points right. :Bravo:

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I am a new member, therefore did not see this when listed, however can I add three things to the list. The right side screw in the backcock is a replacement and the hammer looks to be set halfway through the strike and the foot looking at the case from the back is also a replacement and a poor one at that.

Posted

Well spotted. I run these clock competitions for those that are interested in clocks. It helps what to look out for, there are so many marriages. Ebay always have an plenty. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...